On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Erik Lundin wrote:
> > I think it is better to use original upstream sonames, for compatibility
> > with
> > third-party applications built against upstream versions.
> >
> > The Debian package name should usually be based only on the major part of
> >
On jueves, 25 de mayo de 2017 14:44:14 -03 Erik Lundin wrote:
> Den 2017-05-24 kl. 16:02, skrev Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> > Yes, if those libs are tied to public headers package them as separate
> > binary packages. Your mental health at maintaining time will thank you ;)
> There is a
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your feedback!
Den 2017-05-27 kl. 20:55, skrev Dmitry Shachnev:
The current Qt 4 package has no reverse dependencies, so you can safely drop
it and replace with the Qt 5 package.
I would prefer to avoid conflict, so please use /usr/include/PythonQt5.
Yes, that sounds
