Re: KDE version in Lenny: KDE 3.5.9 vs KDE 4.1

2008-06-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2008 schrieb Pino Toscano: Right now, the only way to have KDE installed by default in a new Debian installation is with a cd1-kde iso. I'll start to believe to Debian+KDE as potential linux desktop only when I see KDE considered in Debian at the same level of GNOME. So

Re: Some notes on my switch to KDE 4.1

2008-08-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Felipe Sateler wrote: Does the new kontact work with the old kmail? If not, a conflicts may be needed. I'd imagine you will simply have the new kontact without any mail functionality, and you can continue to use the old kmail. Which would be weird but not implausible during the transition

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 11:52:36 Ana Guerrero wrote: So, what about: - kde-minimal (just rename current kde4-mininal) I am not sure kde-core longer fits. - kde-full (renamed from current kde4) I agree it is clearer than kde. - kde-development. Not only renamed from kde4-development, also

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 09 April 2009 01:56:12 Scott Kitterman wrote: I think moving things (like games) that it's nice to provide to recommends, so they can be removed without removing the metapackage, will defuse a lot of the tension of these discussions. If it turns out a few too many things get added

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 09 April 2009 00:49:07 Sune Vuorela wrote: What should be KDE? The thing that upstream ships as KDE? I think the kde package should be strongly related to what upstream ships when they say new KDE version released. That is the rule for pretty much all other packages, after all.