Hello, On ketvirtadienis 28 Balandis 2011 01:59:22 Modestas Vainius wrote: > It's not very clear to me (personally) what to do with kdebindings but IMHO > if possible, it's better to delay it sometime after this transition. This > ugly beast links the whole distro together.
Just to note: even if current kdebindings 4:4.4.5 was binNMUed and built fine against 4.6, it would definitely pick up dependency on at least new kdebase- workspace, kdegraphics and kdeedu. kdebindings links sip, python and mono together (and something else I don't remember now). P.S. It is fine to have kdebindings RC buggy in unstable or testing (it wouldn't be the first and the last time, really :-)). All that counts is that it did not end up blocking transitions. -- Modestas Vainius <mo...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
