Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938
Does [0] works without patching qt4? [0] https://github.com/davidedmundson/qtsystemtraypreloadhack -- http://xkcd.com/150/ Personas como ésta no se encuentran todos los días. Y cuando uno las encuentra, suelen no estar disponibles. Si encontrás una, no la pierdas. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938
2015-04-23 15:28 GMT+02:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez perezme...@gmail.com: Does [0] works without patching qt4? I've been told it does work, so I guess it's between me forking the Qt4 packages and maintaining them by myself or using that hack. Ah well ... [0] https://github.com/davidedmundson/qtsystemtraypreloadhack -- http://xkcd.com/150/ Personas como ésta no se encuentran todos los días. Y cuando uno las encuentra, suelen no estar disponibles. Si encontrás una, no la pierdas. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:28:56 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Does [0] works without patching qt4? [0] https://github.com/davidedmundson/qtsystemtraypreloadhack That looks like a not-yet-written code. Also I don't see how we would be able to use it in Debian: it will need to be LD_PRELOAD'ed to all Qt 4 apps. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 14:51:32 Rohan Garg wrote: So far I haven't seen a good reason not to include the patch ( from what I've gathered talking to people on IRC ) It is the other way around. We don't need reasons why not to include things. We need reasons to include it, despite not being picked up by upstream, and descriptions on why it is safe to actually include it. (I haven't recently looked at the patch in question) /Sune -- I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world. And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist. - zefrank -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
