Re: Bug#777981: lightdm: ftbfs with GCC-5
Hi Yves-Alexis, On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:04:21 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I somehow missed this bug. I'm a bit unsure what to do with those symbols updates. I guess it's related to some libstdc++ change but I'm unsure what that really means for me. Should I just update the symbols files here? (I'm really not fluent in Qt or C++ so really any help appreciated here). All symbols that are removed in the diff are destructors for Qt classes that are not part of Qt's own ABI (i.e. declared inline or template instantiations). These symbols are not exposed to users of your library and can be safely removed from the symbols file. You usually only need to worry if the symbols diff contains __cxx11, in this case there are no symbols containing this so you are safe. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Bug#777981: lightdm: ftbfs with GCC-5
On Saturday 22 August 2015 11:48:47 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: Hi Yves-Alexis, On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:04:21 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I somehow missed this bug. I'm a bit unsure what to do with those symbols updates. I guess it's related to some libstdc++ change but I'm unsure what that really means for me. Should I just update the symbols files here? (I'm really not fluent in Qt or C++ so really any help appreciated here). All symbols that are removed in the diff are destructors for Qt classes that are not part of Qt's own ABI (i.e. declared inline or template instantiations). These symbols are not exposed to users of your library and can be safely removed from the symbols file. You usually only need to worry if the symbols diff contains __cxx11, in this case there are no symbols containing this so you are safe. Just to be more precise: s/usually/for this transition/ After this transition happens then normal rules apply. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Bug#777981: lightdm: ftbfs with GCC-5
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 11:48:47AM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: Hi Yves-Alexis, On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:04:21 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I somehow missed this bug. I'm a bit unsure what to do with those symbols updates. I guess it's related to some libstdc++ change but I'm unsure what that really means for me. Should I just update the symbols files here? (I'm really not fluent in Qt or C++ so really any help appreciated here). All symbols that are removed in the diff are destructors for Qt classes that are not part of Qt's own ABI (i.e. declared inline or template instantiations). These symbols are not exposed to users of your library and can be safely removed from the symbols file. You usually only need to worry if the symbols diff contains __cxx11, in this case there are no symbols containing this so you are safe. Thank you for the help. I'll upload the package and make an upload then. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis Perez signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk