Hello,
thanks for pushing this transition. What do you think, if I
have a library, which is now built against qt4, should I just
switch to qt5 or create lib-qt5-dev for the transition period?
The second question is the problem with armel and armhf
qt5-builds. I think it will cause some problems
On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would also like some input from the KDE maintainers, specially (but not
limited to) maxy on how KDE's porting efforts are being developed (for
example, do you think we will have a usable KDE with Qt5 experience by the
end of the
On April 16, 2015 7:21:44 PM EDT, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
perezme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2015 18:43:52 Scott Kitterman wrote:
[snip]
If you look at what paultag started regarding python3 migration (see
dda), I
think that's a good model for creating positive
On Thursday 16 April 2015 22:37:52 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote:
[snip]
Hi, the porting progress of KDE Applications is currently working quite
nicely IMO. An overview on what currently is already ported is e.g. here:
