Re: Removing amarok

2017-12-25 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El lunes, 11 de septiembre de 2017 10:35:54 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez 
Meyer 
escribió:
> Hi everybody! I'm considering asking for the RoM removal of amarok
> from the archive. It has plenty of bugs, no active upstream (aka dead
> upstream) and no finished port to Qt5.
> 
> With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask
> the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...
> 
> My suggestion for them would be to get it from stable until they find
> a suitable replacement. But the truth is that it currently does not
> belongs in Buster and there is no signal of having a chance to avoid
> it.
> 
> Does anyone has anything against this?

OK, I think now it's the right time to go ahead with this. Does anyone knows a 
good reason not 
to do it now?

Cheers, Lisandro.


-- 
Cuando me preguntaron sobre algún arma capaz de contrarrestar el poder de la
bomba atómica, yo sugerí la mejor de todas: la paz.
 Albert Einstein

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Removing amarok

2017-09-12 Thread Diederik de Haas
On dinsdag 12 september 2017 16:34:05 CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> Just developers, at this point there is no use in asking users.

In that case, carry on :-)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Removing amarok

2017-09-12 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On 11 September 2017 at 20:03, Diederik de Haas  wrote:
> On Monday, September 11, 2017 10:35:54 AM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
> Meyer wrote:
>> With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask
>> the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...
>
> There's a good chance that only developers watch this list. If you (also) want
> to reach 'normal' users, consider posting it to debian-kde as well

Just developers, at this point there is no use in asking users. A
different story would have been if all we needed is manpower.

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Removing amarok

2017-09-12 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday, September 11, 2017 10:35:54 AM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez 
Meyer wrote:
> With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask
> the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...

There's a good chance that only developers watch this list. If you (also) want 
to reach 'normal' users, consider posting it to debian-kde as well


-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk