Re: Removing amarok

On 11 September 2017 at 20:03, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Monday, September 11, 2017 10:35:54 AM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer wrote: >> With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask >> the removal, but I know lots of people love

Removing amarok

Hi everybody! I'm considering asking for the RoM removal of amarok from the archive. It has plenty of bugs, no active upstream (aka dead upstream) and no finished port to Qt5. With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...