Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] xulrunner-dev is gone
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package, and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps would need. This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about? Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd encounter. At the moment gnash expects npapi.h under /usr/include/xulrunner* dirs. Fixable by making it look for it also under /usr/include/iceweasel*. Will ubuntu move headers to /u/i/firefox*? AFAICT, Ubuntu has a firefox-dev package that only contains NPAPI headers in /usr/include/firefox. I don't think that would be enough for all rdeps we have in Debian. I think some are not NPAPI plugins. Anyways, I guess most rdeps are just using the mozilla-*.pc files. I'll at least add the mozilla-plugin.pc one in next upload (which I'll do tomorrow morning, after I confirm only armel is broken). That should help most. How about linking /u/i/xulrunner - /u/i/iceweasel-N instead? BTW would packaging npapi-sdk still be a good alternative? https://bugs.debian.org/642168 Definitely, yes. Mike ___ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers
Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] xulrunner-dev is gone
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:47:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package, and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps would need. Wait. You upload something known-broken to unstable? I actually only had the oh crap moment, *after* uploading. Shit happens. I'm not going to upload 29 with an epoch for that, though. Mike ___ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers
[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] xulrunner-dev is gone
Hi, I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package, and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps would need. This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about? Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd encounter. I *will* eventually get to doing the research myself, but it would really be helpful if you could beat me to it :) Cheers, Mike ___ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers
