Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:47:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not > to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package, > and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are > things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps > would need.
Wait. You upload something known-broken to unstable? Why on earth didn't you ask people to test on experimental first? > This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your > packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about? > Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd > encounter. Will do. (Maybe not a bad move of LO to remove all NPAPI support.) > I *will* eventually get to doing the research myself, but it would > really be helpful if you could beat me to it :) It would really be helpful not to break unstable like that. Regards, Rene _______________________________________________ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers