Yao Wei:
> Hi,
>
> There are some problems for us to package Debian packages for
> WebExtensions that can support Firefox and Chromium using the same
> codebase. I do come up with my idea, but I still need a conclusion to
> prepare a package:
>
> 1. Should we use different prefix for the WebExtensions packages that
> support different browsers?
>
> I think webext- prefix can be good for this kind of packages.
>
> 2. Should we split the package for different browsers?
>
> There's current efforts packaging ublock-origin for both chromium and
> xul-ext. However shifting to WebExtensions implies that the codebase
> will be the same. To save disk space and lower the security risk not to
> split the main package could be good. Some of the browser-dependent
> files can be splitted to their dedicated packages.
>
> Inputs are welcome!
>
Hi Yao Wei, thanks for taking this forward! I have not been following the
discussions very closely but this all seems sensible to me.
Best,
Ximin
--
GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35
GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers
