Hello,
On Thu, Dec 28 2017, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Please let me know how this fits with your plans, and if there are no
> objections I'll do an upload to Debian unstable so packages can start
> using it.
Thank you for working on this.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Sebastian Noack:
> [..] the only thing that install-xpi seems to do is creating symlinks in
> /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/ based on the supported applications listed
> in install.rdf. But WebExtensions should not have an install.rdf, and
> support exactly one Gecko application (i.e. Firefox). So
Yao Wei:
> Hi,
>
> There are some problems for us to package Debian packages for
> WebExtensions that can support Firefox and Chromium using the same
> codebase. I do come up with my idea, but I still need a conclusion to
> prepare a package:
>
> 1. Should we use different prefix for the
Dear Sebastian,
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> as you might know, Firefox is moving away from traditional Gecko
> extensions, towards WebExtensions which are essentially the same as
> Chrome extensions.
Right. We need to update our tools, but the work hasn't
