On 23.04.2018 17:09, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/04/18 15:55, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> binary:libsynfig0 is NEW.
>> binary:libsynfig0 is NEW.
>
> Unfortunately, since you failed to follow the NMU procedure by not
> uploading the diff anywhere (again), I can't check for myself, but I
Hi,
On 23/04/18 15:55, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:libsynfig0 is NEW.
> binary:libsynfig0 is NEW.
Unfortunately, since you failed to follow the NMU procedure by not
uploading the diff anywhere (again), I can't check for myself, but I
would like to know how you have managed to make this
binary:libsynfig0 is NEW.
binary:libsynfig0 is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely
synfig_1.2.1-0.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
synfig_1.2.1-0.1.dsc
synfig_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz
synfig_1.2.1-0.1.debian.tar.xz
libsynfig-dev_1.2.1-0.1_amd64.deb
libsynfig0-dbgsym_1.2.1-0.1_amd64.deb
libsynfig0_1.2.1-0.1_amd64.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 22:47:38 +0200
Source: musescore
Binary: musescore musescore-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.2.1+dfsg1-1~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports-sloppy
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian