Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

On 2019-02-12 13:04:57, Petri Hintukainen wrote: > Hello, > > On 2019-02-11 21:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Thanks for working on this issue. What's the status of the release? > > Will it be available soon? > > 1.1.0 release has been tagged and should appear in downloads soon. > > I've test

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hello, On 2019-02-11 21:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Thanks for working on this issue. What's the status of the release? > Will it be available soon? 1.1.0 release has been tagged and should appear in downloads soon. I've tested a lot of BD-J apps with OpenJDK 11, and it seems to work just we

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Petri On 2019-01-22 10:02:40, Petri Hintukainen wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:14 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Looking at the commit history, it seems that there have been some > > changes wrt java > > compatibility, mostly by you. I wonder whether you'd expect libbluray > > t

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Adrian, On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > Due to popcon (and reverse dependencies) libbluray is a key package > that won't be autoremoved (otherwise it would have been autoremoved > from buster 9 months ago). > That's good to know, thanks for pointing it out. > A lowere

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Control: severity -1 serious On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 06:14:55AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >... > The schedule for Debian can be seen at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster: > >- > >2014-11-09: Distribution codename announced >

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:34 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 22/01/2019 à 23:26, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > > > Since openjdk-8 is going to be kept in Buster, I don't think > > we need to keep this bug at RC severity. I'm concerned that keeping > > this bug at RC severity might risk having libblu

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Le 22/01/2019 à 23:26, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > Since openjdk-8 is going to be kept in Buster, I don't think > we need to keep this bug at RC severity. I'm concerned that keeping > this bug at RC severity might risk having libbluray being removed > from testing, which I don't think is in the b

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional > cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to > build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and t

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems _

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Reinhard, Le 22/01/2019 à 12:14, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java? > What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster? OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional cases (for example the lombok package requires b

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Petri, The schedule for Debian can be seen at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster: - 2014-11-09: Distribution codename announced - 2017-06-17: Stretch is released,

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hello, On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:14 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Looking at the commit history, it seems that there have been some > changes wrt java > compatibility, mostly by you. I wonder whether you'd expect libbluray > to work with > openjdk-11. If not, is this something on your roadmap, or d

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Petri, I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing list last march [1]. The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11, and we as package maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your response back then was that th