Am 21.03.2012 01:40, schrieb Andres Mejia:
I would like to upload a package to experimental soon. Anyone have any
other suggestions at this time?
BTW, I have added a mention of the license impact to
libavcodec-extra's decription.
___
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are some of the comments Reinhard said on IRC. Placing them here
for recording purposes.
[02:47] siretart amejia: in the merged case, I
FYI to all, here was Christian's response. Don't have time yet to
fully respond, but I think keeping some packages there because they're
not uploaded in Debian as quickly is not really a good reason to
upload them or keep them uploaded at DMO. He's a DD and he could help
to keep these packages
Am 21.03.2012 12:46, schrieb Andres Mejia:
upload them or keep them uploaded at DMO. He's a DD and he could help
to keep these packages updated in Debian instead (though this would
mean he would have to work with the team).
Don't forget he is raising money with DMO. Each removed incentive to
mididings_0~20120312-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mididings_0~20120312-1.dsc
mididings_0~20120312.orig.tar.gz
mididings_0~20120312-1.debian.tar.gz
python-mididings_0~20120312-1_amd64.deb
mididings_0~20120312-1_all.deb
Accepted:
mididings-doc_0~20120312-1_all.deb
to main/m/mididings/mididings-doc_0~20120312-1_all.deb
mididings_0~20120312-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/m/mididings/mididings_0~20120312-1.debian.tar.gz
mididings_0~20120312-1.dsc
to main/m/mididings/mididings_0~20120312-1.dsc
Package: qjackctl
Version: 0.3.8-1
Severity: wishlist
Qjackctl can be configured to start, or not, the Jack server on startup;
however, it apparently can't be told to leave the server running on
exit. This should be made configurable; alternatively, Qjackctl should
remember whether it started
Package: mplayer2
Version: 2.0-426-gc32b3ed-2
Severity: normal
Hi.
Whenever I listen to the radio station at
http://media.sgr.globo.com/CBN/cbnsp.stream/playlist.m3u8
I get bazillions of messages like the following in my output:
,
| Using network protocols without global network
On 12-03-21 at 12:50pm, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 21.03.2012 12:46, schrieb Andres Mejia:
upload them or keep them uploaded at DMO. He's a DD and he could help
to keep these packages updated in Debian instead (though this would
mean he would have to work with the team).
Don't forget he
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Christian Hilberg hilb...@unix-ag.org wrote:
Sorry, version information got cut...
ii mplayer 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn33713-2
that's supposed to read '2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn33713-2~bpo60+1'
Yes, mplayer in squeeze-backports needs to be updated. Probably libav
libaacs_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libaacs_0.3.1-1.dsc
libaacs_0.3.1.orig.tar.bz2
libaacs_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
libaacs0_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
libaacs-dev_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
libaacs-dev_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libaacs/libaacs-dev_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
libaacs0_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libaacs/libaacs0_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
libaacs_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/liba/libaacs/libaacs_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
libaacs_0.3.1-1.dsc
to
Each time you quote emails from me or in other ways mention my full
name, you promote my presence on Internet and therefore my ability to
earn money on being a famous geek.
Maybe, but sheer internet presence is not comparable to a Donate button.
Please stop distorting this issue - it is *not*
libav_0.8.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libav_0.8.1-2.dsc
libav_0.8.1-2.debian.tar.gz
libav-tools_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
ffmpeg_0.8.1-2_all.deb
ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
libav-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
libav-regular-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you volunteer to do at least the first uploads for libav and
libav-extra for ubuntu as well?
Yes, I'll volunteer, but the first thing I would do for ubuntu is a)
request
On 12-03-21 at 09:00pm, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Each time you quote emails from me or in other ways mention my full
name, you promote my presence on Internet and therefore my ability
to earn money on being a famous geek.
Maybe, but sheer internet presence is not comparable to a Donate
On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you volunteer to do at least the first uploads for libav and
libav-extra for ubuntu as well?
Yes,
ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
ffmpeg-doc_0.8.1-2_all.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-doc_0.8.1-2_all.deb
ffmpeg_0.8.1-2_all.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg_0.8.1-2_all.deb
libav-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/libav-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
Accepted:
i965-va-driver-dbg_1.0.16-4_amd64.deb
to main/i/intel-vaapi-driver/i965-va-driver-dbg_1.0.16-4_amd64.deb
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-4_amd64.deb
to main/i/intel-vaapi-driver/i965-va-driver_1.0.16-4_amd64.deb
intel-vaapi-driver_1.0.16-4.debian.tar.gz
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libs, override says
oldlibs.
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-4_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Package: mediatomb
Version: 0.12.1-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
scanning the collection segfaults mediatomb with the following syslog entry:
mediatomb[7691]: segfault at 34 ip 004a61a2 sp 7fc9c14d86a0 error 4
in mediatomb[40+1ce000]
Running mediatomb in the debug mode
Accepted:
ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
ffmpeg-doc_0.8.1-2_all.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-doc_0.8.1-2_all.deb
ffmpeg_0.8.1-2_all.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg_0.8.1-2_all.deb
libav-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libavdevice-extra-53_0.8.1-2_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override
says libs.
libavdevice-extra-53_0.8.1-2_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override
says optional.
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:33:17 +
with message-id e1sau5l-0001ks...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#642798: fixed in libav 5:0.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #642798,
regarding libav-extra: Libraries uninstallable because of libav-dbg
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:33:17 +
with message-id e1sau5l-0001ky...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#653451: fixed in libav 5:0.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #653451,
regarding libavcodec-extra-53: Please document the differences in the
description
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:33:18 +
with message-id e1sau5m-0001kd...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#658084: fixed in libav 5:0.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #658084,
regarding libav-extra: Really necessary?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Accepted:
zita-ajbridge_0.1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/z/zita-ajbridge/zita-ajbridge_0.1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
zita-ajbridge_0.1.0-1.dsc
to main/z/zita-ajbridge/zita-ajbridge_0.1.0-1.dsc
zita-ajbridge_0.1.0-1_amd64.deb
to main/z/zita-ajbridge/zita-ajbridge_0.1.0-1_amd64.deb
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:37:25 +
with message-id e1sau9l-0002v6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#664665: fixed in zita-ajbridge 0.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #664665,
regarding ITP: zita-ajbridge -- ALSA to JACK bridge
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hi,
I finished update package 'crtmpserver'.
This is major update from the point of view of upstream update, but
debian package changes are insignificant.
So, please, upload updated version of package.
--
Best regards,
Andriy
0xBDDBDAE3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are some of the comments Reinhard said on IRC. Placing them here
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you volunteer to do at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Just to put some real data on packages that are in both Debian and
debian-multimedia.org I extracted the appended data from UDD.
I suspect that many will find inclusion of packages like libdrm-intel1
and libdrm2 somewhat beyond the
On 03/21/2012 05:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Could anyone from the team please upload 0.8.1 to precise for me
before the freeze? Thanks in advance!
I think with the changes made to the version in 4:0.8.1-1, a merge would
need an FFe if we're going to keep everything that Debian has enabled.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM,
Ok everyone. Feel free to starting testing the new libav packages.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Debian FTP Masters
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
Accepted:
ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
ffmpeg-doc_0.8.1-2_all.deb
to
I should have worded that better.
Testers wanted. Please help test the new libav packages.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok everyone. Feel free to starting testing the new libav packages.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Debian FTP Masters
On 03/21/2012 06:34 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia
Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 07:46 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
FYI to all, here was Christian's response. Don't have time yet to
fully respond, but I think keeping some packages there because they're
not uploaded in Debian as quickly is not really a good reason to
upload them or keep them
On 20-Mar-12, at 9:54 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
This issue is common if you're using the libav-extra libraries. It's
likely a broken symlink from your *.so files.
I don't think so. Updating libgcrypt11 to 1.5.0-3 fixes the build.
Somehow,
it eliminates the dependency.
Dave
--
John David
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stuart Prescott
stu...@nanonanonano.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Just to put some real data on packages that are in both Debian and
debian-multimedia.org I extracted the appended data from UDD.
I suspect that many will
crtmpserver_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
crtmpserver_1.0~dfsg-1.dsc
crtmpserver_1.0~dfsg.orig.tar.bz2
crtmpserver_1.0~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
crtmpserver_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
crtmpserver-libs_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
2012/3/21 Andriy Beregovenko j...@jet.kiev.ua:
Hi,
I finished update package 'crtmpserver'.
This is major update from the point of view of upstream update, but
debian package changes are insignificant.
So, please, upload updated version of package.
--
Best regards,
Andriy
0xBDDBDAE3
Accepted:
crtmpserver-apps_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
to main/c/crtmpserver/crtmpserver-apps_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
crtmpserver-dev_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
to main/c/crtmpserver/crtmpserver-dev_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
crtmpserver-libs_1.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
to
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stuart Prescott
stu...@nanonanonano.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Just to put some real data on packages that are in both Debian and
44 matches
Mail list logo
