Hi,
Having an online newsletter could be a nice
little way to build your subscribers and
potentially sell products to them in the future.
Online newsletters usually aren't difficult to
start up, as there are very few aspects that need
to be completed. With just a few steps, you can
be gaining
Package: gmusicbrowser
Version: 1.1.9-2
Severity: minor
| gmusicbrower is a powerful graphic browser which supports libraries with
^missing 's'
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
binary:mpv is NEW.
source:mpv is NEW.
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
___
mpv_0.1.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mpv_0.1.3-1.dsc
mpv_0.1.3.orig.tar.gz
mpv_0.1.3-1.debian.tar.gz
mpv_0.1.3-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 677959 serious
Bug #677959 [mediatomb] mediatomb: fails to build against current version of
libavformat
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
block 706798 with 677959
Bug #706798 [release.debian.org] transition: Libav 9
706798 was
`/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
| make[1]: *** No rule to make target `config.mk'. Stop.
The full build log is available from
http://people.debian.org/~sramacher/logs/cmus_2.5.0-2_amd64-20130825-1455.log
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (650, 'unstable'), (601
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 720781 cmus: FTBFS: No rule to make target `config.mk'
Bug #720781 [src:cmus] amide: FTBFS: No rule to make target `config.mk'
Changed Bug title to 'cmus: FTBFS: No rule to make target `config.mk'' from
'amide: FTBFS: No rule to make
Package: gmusicbrowser
Version: 1.1.9-2
Followup-For: Bug #720760
Keita Maehara maeh...@debian.org wrote:
| gmusicbrower is a powerful graphic browser which supports libraries with
^missing 's'
It would be a pity to fix that and miss the various other problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 720779 + sid jessie
Bug #720779 [src:amide] amide: FTBFS against libav 9
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
tags 720781 + sid jessie
Bug #720781 [src:cmus] cmus: FTBFS: No rule to make target `config.mk'
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
tags 720783 +
Source: lives
Version: 2.0.5~ds0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Related to current libav9 transition (see
Source: idjc
Version: 0.8.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Related to current libav9 transition (see
Source: lv2-c++-tools
Version: 1.0.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
g++ -c -o
Source: dvbcut
Version: 0.5.4+svn178-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Related to current libav9 transition
Source: wxsvg
Version: 2:1.1.8~dfsg0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Related to current libav9 transition
Source: transcode
Version: 3:1.1.7-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Related to current libav9 transition
Processing control commands:
block -1 by 720809 720808 720796 720823 720799 720797 720805
Bug #706798 [release.debian.org] transition: Libav 9
706798 was blocked by: 694143 720661 693639 694131 720779 693641 692809 720790
720727 693560 720785 720783 692980 692505 677959
706798 was blocking:
rubberband_1.8.1-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rubberband_1.8.1-4.dsc
rubberband_1.8.1-4.debian.tar.gz
librubberband2_1.8.1-4_amd64.deb
librubberband-dev_1.8.1-4_amd64.deb
rubberband-cli_1.8.1-4_amd64.deb
rubberband-ladspa_1.8.1-4_amd64.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:30:37 +0200
Source: rubberband
Binary: librubberband2 librubberband-dev rubberband-cli rubberband-ladspa
rubberband-vamp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.8.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 18:48:29 +
with message-id e1vdfmt-0001tn...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#720154: fixed in rubberband 1.8.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #720154,
regarding rubberband-cli: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
to
Hi,
I am introducing python3-liblo package in pyliblo.
Would be great if someone can review package before I will upload I am
doing this first time.
regards
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
Hi Jaromir,
On 2013-08-25 21:14:12, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
I am introducing python3-liblo package in pyliblo.
Would be great if someone can review package before I will upload I am
doing this first time.
Here are some remarks. In debian/control:
| Package: python-liblo
| Section: python
|
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 720868 +sid +jessie
Bug #720868 [xul-ext-sage] xul-ext-sage: unusable with Iceweasel 23
Added tag(s) sid.
Bug #720868 [xul-ext-sage] xul-ext-sage: unusable with Iceweasel 23
Added tag(s) jessie.
tags 720845 +sid +jessie
Bug #720845
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2013-08-24 18:59:03)
Hi, I wonder if anybody who has tried the new workflow of merging in
the upstream history could share their impressions on it? I'm
considering using it, but some questions arise:
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2013-08-26 00:09:49)
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2013-08-24 18:59:03)
Hi, I wonder if anybody who has tried the new workflow of merging
in the upstream history could share their impressions on it?
24 matches
Mail list logo