Re: got some errors while upgrading gstreamer plugins bad and good.

2013-10-30 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Do, 2013-10-24 at 12:33 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 11:26 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Dröge: Thanks, feel free to upload new versions with these changes :) Sorry, I don't have upload rights and am thus dependant on sponsoring. Ok, I'll get it uploaded until

liblivemedia_2013.10.25-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2013-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:libgroupsock1 is NEW. binary:liblivemedia15 is NEW. binary:libusageenvironment1 is NEW. Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a

Re: got some errors while upgrading gstreamer plugins bad and good.

2013-10-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 11:12 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Dröge: Ok, I'll get it uploaded until the end of the week, together with the upcoming 1.2.1 bugfix release. Thanks for the changes :) You're welcome! :) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7

2013-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2013-10-28 6:46, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: recently vlc source package has been updated and it now builds libvlccore7 instead of libvlccore5. It is possible to build phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7. Now phonon-backend-vlc have broken depends on i386 and amd64. On others

Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7

2013-10-30 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Hello, On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:29 +, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On 2013-10-28 6:46, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: recently vlc source package has been updated and it now builds libvlccore7 instead of libvlccore5. It is possible to build phonon-backend-vlc

Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7

2013-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2013-10-30 12:08, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:29 +, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: [...] * New major upstream release. (Closes: #436339, #632965, #642187, #698023, #593735, #724734, #665732, #700752, #704941, #708953,

Re: Bug#728146: pd-iemambi: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: #error No byte order defined

2013-10-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, On 2013-10-28 22:08, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: pd-iemambi fails to build on kfreebsd-* with: | /usr/bin/make -C src CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall CXXFLAGS=-g -O2

Bug#728146: pd-iemambi: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: #error No byte order defined

2013-10-30 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2013-10-30 14:18:24, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: hi, On 2013-10-28 22:08, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: pd-iemambi fails to build on kfreebsd-* with: | /usr/bin/make -C src CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall CXXFLAGS=-g

Bug#728146: pd-iemambi: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: #error No byte order defined

2013-10-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-10-30 15:12, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: could anybody please confirm that it pd-iemambi does (not) build on their kfreebsd-* systems? I confirmed the build failure on fischer.d.o. Note that /usr/include/machine/endian.h guards the

Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7

2013-10-30 Thread Benjamin Drung
On Mi, 2013-10-30 at 13:08 +0100, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: Hello, On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:29 +, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On 2013-10-28 6:46, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: recently vlc source package has been updated and it now builds libvlccore7 instead of

Processing of stk_4.4.4-4_amd64.changes

2013-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
stk_4.4.4-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: stk_4.4.4-4.dsc stk_4.4.4-4.debian.tar.gz libstk0-dev_4.4.4-4_amd64.deb libstk0c2a_4.4.4-4_amd64.deb stk_4.4.4-4_amd64.deb stk-doc_4.4.4-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

stk_4.4.4-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:41:12 -0300 Source: stk Binary: libstk0-dev libstk0c2a stk stk-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 4.4.4-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Bug#728079: marked as done (stk: FTFBS on kfreebsd but built there in the past)

2013-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:03:51 + with message-id e1vbyfl-5k...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#728079: fixed in stk 4.4.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #728079, regarding stk: FTFBS on kfreebsd but built there in the past to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2013-10-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On 10/29/2013 10:46 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: * Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-29 10:10]: My question is more the opposite: when do people use the plain version without any of the avin2 patches? I think we should call the current package 'openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect',

Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7

2013-10-30 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le mercredi 30 octobre 2013 16:48:30 Benjamin Drung a écrit : These packages should be fixed to use the stable API from libvlc instead of using libvlccore. Looking at the other package, they all just depend on libvlc, but not on libvlccore. Just phonon-backend-vlc requires libvlccore. Even

Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7

2013-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2013-10-30 15:48, Benjamin Drung wrote: On Mi, 2013-10-30 at 13:08 +0100, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: Hello, On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:29 +, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On 2013-10-28 6:46, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: recently vlc source package has been updated and it

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2013-10-30 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-30 12:11]: Patches in a Debian package are not meant for adding new functionality. They are meant to get the code building/working/installing on Debian, and for fixing security bugs. So the package that includes those patches should be named