crtmpserver is marked for autoremoval from testing

crtmpserver 1.0~dfsg-5.2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-11-10 It is affected by these RC bugs: 828274: crtmpserver: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: tagging 837570, tagging 837566, tagging 837487, tagging 837394, tagging 837393, tagging 837683 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 837570 + sid stretch Bug #837570 [src:msrtool] msrtool: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled Added tag(s) stretch and sid. > tags 837566 + sid stretch Bug #837566 [src:mjpegtools] mjpegtools: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled Added tag(s)

kodi-pvr-argustv_2.5.0+git20160923-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:30:37 +0200 Source: kodi-pvr-argustv Binary: kodi-pvr-argustv Architecture: source Version: 2.5.0+git20160923-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Processing of kodi-pvr-argustv_2.5.0+git20160923-1_source.changes

kodi-pvr-argustv_2.5.0+git20160923-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kodi-pvr-argustv_2.5.0+git20160923-1.dsc kodi-pvr-argustv_2.5.0+git20160923.orig.tar.xz kodi-pvr-argustv_2.5.0+git20160923-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue

Bug#840338: Wheezy update for libass ?

Hi I had a quick look at libass today regarding CVE-2016-7971. When I read the discussion thread about this issue it looks like the problem is not only disputed upstream, but actually disputed by the person reporting the issue. Or rather the person reporting the issue has carified that the

Processed (with 92 errors): OpenSSL transition severity

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 828417 serious Bug #828417 [src:libxr] libxr: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 828502 serious Bug #828502 [src:pidgin-openfetion] pidgin-openfetion: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Severity set to

ffms2 2.23-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the ffms2 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.22-1 Current version: 2.23-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

vlc 2.2.4-7 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the vlc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.2.4-6 Current version: 2.2.4-7 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

kodi-pvr-hts REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the kodi-pvr-hts source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.2.14-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: (no removal hint found) The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney

kodi REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the kodi source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 16.1+dfsg1-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: (no removal hint found) The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint

xbmc-pvr-addons REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the xbmc-pvr-addons source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 13.0+git20140512+g91cc731+dfsg1-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: (no removal hint found) The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from

kodi-pvr-vdr-vnsi REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the kodi-pvr-vdr-vnsi source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.11.15-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: (no removal hint found) The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the

mpv 0.21.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the mpv source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.20.0-1 Current version: 0.21.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

xbmc REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the xbmc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: (no removal hint found) The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint

Bug#842141: marked as done (kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-1_ppc64el.changes REJECTED)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:24:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#842141: fixed in kodi 17.0~beta4+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #842141, regarding kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-1_ppc64el.changes REJECTED to be marked as done. This

mplayer_1.3.0-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:55:16 +0100 Source: mplayer Binary: mplayer-gui mencoder mplayer mplayer-doc Architecture: source Version: 2:1.3.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:37:42 +0200 Source: kodi Binary: kodi kodi-data kodi-bin kodi-eventclients-common kodi-eventclients-dev kodi-eventclients-wiiremote kodi-eventclients-ps3 kodi-eventclients-kodi-send

Processed: Bug#842141 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 842141 pending Bug #842141 [kodi] kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-1_ppc64el.changes REJECTED Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 842141:

Processing of kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-2_source.changes

kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-2.dsc kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___

Processing of mplayer_1.3.0-4_source.changes

mplayer_1.3.0-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mplayer_1.3.0-4.dsc mplayer_1.3.0-4.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers

mpv_0.21.0-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:08:05 +0100 Source: mpv Binary: mpv libmpv1 libmpv-dev mplayer2 Architecture: source Version: 0.21.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Processing of mpv_0.21.0-2_source.changes

mpv_0.21.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mpv_0.21.0-2.dsc mpv_0.21.0-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

Hi James, 2016-10-26 12:48 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill : > On 26/10/16 11:00, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> 2016-09-21 4:28 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : >>> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 18:14 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >>> I have changed kodi 17.x to provide

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

On 26/10/16 11:00, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi Paul, > > 2016-09-21 4:28 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : >> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 18:14 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> >>> I have changed kodi 17.x to provide xbmc*. >>> The next upload to experimental will contain the fix. >> >> Excellent,

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

2016-10-26 12:28 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : > On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 12:19 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > >> I'd suggest to re-apply (and maybe even increment) xbmc's epoch for kodi. > > That isn't going to fix the RC bug. > > The only options are: > > * Generate the xbmc versions in

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

2016-10-26 12:19 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath : > Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Are you suggesting some other solution? I'm not sure I understand it then. >> Xbmc has epoch which I got rid of with kodi. > > I'd suggest to re-apply (and maybe even increment) xbmc's epoch for kodi. >

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 12:19 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > I'd suggest to re-apply (and maybe even increment) xbmc's epoch for kodi. That isn't going to fix the RC bug. The only options are: * Generate the xbmc versions in a different way. * Move the xbmc transitional packages back to xbmc

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

Bálint Réczey wrote: > Are you suggesting some other solution? I'm not sure I understand it then. > Xbmc has epoch which I got rid of with kodi. I'd suggest to re-apply (and maybe even increment) xbmc's epoch for kodi. What's the point in getting rid of an epoch, why is it even important? -

sichern & unbesichert Darlehen angebot

machen Sie brauchen Darlehen für irgendein Zweck? Kontakt über Email für niedrig interessieren sichern & unbesichert Darlehen. Leihen Darlehen Menge von 3000euro bis zu 3000.000 euro. wählen von 1Jahr nach 25 Jahre wie Darlehen Rückzahlung Dauer. mohammed_sah...@qq.com CONFIDENTIALITY

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

Hi Fabian, 2016-10-26 12:06 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath : > Bálint Réczey wrote: >> If you have any good idea please share it, otherwise I'm revert to >> provide the transitional packages from xbmc. > > Epochs have been invented for this exact use case. Are you suggesting

Re: Transitioning mplayer2 users to mpv

Hi, On 19/10/16 22:56, James Cowgill wrote: > Recently on IRC, uau suggested that instead of transitioning mplayer2 > users to mplayer, they should be transitioned to mpv instead. The > reasons for this include: mpv being a fork of mplayer2 (thus retaining > mplayer2 specific functionality), and

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 12:00 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > It seems it is too much hassle to maintain the xbmc packages > generated from kodi source, see #842141. Ugh, that is annoying. > I could append the current version to the xbmc package versions, > but that would just confuse users. That

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

Bálint Réczey wrote: > If you have any good idea please share it, otherwise I'm revert to > provide the transitional packages from xbmc. Epochs have been invented for this exact use case. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: remove xbmc from Debian testing/unstable?

Hi Paul, 2016-09-21 4:28 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : > On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 18:14 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> I have changed kodi 17.x to provide xbmc*. >> The next upload to experimental will contain the fix. > > Excellent, thanks for that! It seems it is too much hassle to

Bug#842141: kodi_17.0~beta4+dfsg1-1_ppc64el.changes REJECTED

Package: kodi Version: 17.0~beta4+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious The experimental version of the kodi package builds the xbmc-bin package in a version which already exists in the archive. Please fix that as otherwise the package is rejected by dak. See below: On 2016-10-26 00:35, Debian FTP Masters

Bug#822703: vlc: Too broad dependencies of the package

Fixed with version 2.2.4-7, nicely done! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers