Bug#874220: stretch update for openni2

* Adrian Bunk [2018-03-12 20:52]: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 09:18:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: ... openni2 (2.2.0.33+dfsg-10) unstable; urgency=medium . * Add patch for arm. Thanks to Adrian Bunk (Closes: #874220) ... Thanks a lot for fixing this bug

Bug#858245: gmusicbrowser: Search-as-you-type causes crash

Hi Vladimir, I think we need some more information. Can you try it with an empty config? I.e. mv ~/.config/gmusicbrowser/ gmusicbrowser_backup Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Bug#788680: openni: FTBFS on mipsel Unknown platform: mips64

Source: openni Followup-For: Bug #788680 Hi Gustavo, thanks for the patch. Can you please clean it up (remove patches to patches, backup files, other cruft), so I can apply it? Thanks! Jochen ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Bug#771187: primesense-nite-nonfree: Package broken because openni.org is gone

Package: primesense-nite-nonfree Severity: important Hi, primesense-nite-nonfree is trying to download the Nite binaries from openni.org, which is no longer available [1]. This makes this package unusable. I've found copies of the .tar.bz2 here:

Bug#771189: primesense-nite-nonfree: Nite needs license key file

Package: primesense-nite-nonfree Severity: important Hi, till now Openni serves a /var/lib/ni/licenses.xml with a Nite license¹. Given that this is only needed for Nite and we got asked in #771053 why it's included, I would propose to move the license (or rather the niReg call) into

Bug#767653:

Hi Tobi, * Tobias Frost t...@debian.org [2014-11-25 20:53]: built uploaded! Thanks! Please apply for the unblock. Done: #771053 (Note that I s/UNRELEASED/unstable in d/changelog; make sure to do this to in your repository) Done. Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#767653:

Hi Tobi, thanks for the clearifications, I've pushed a new version. Can you have a look again? Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#767653:

Hi Tobi, * Tobias Frost t...@debian.org [2014-11-24 22:12]: Ok, pulled from the git and comparing to the version currently in Jessie: As we are in the freeze, you need to create targeted fixes for RC Bugs only.* So the doxygen one isn't. This seems to be coming from a new Doxygen version and

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-25 11:08]: Uploaded! Let's hope ftp-masters likes it :) Great, thanks :). Could you remove the patches which shouldn't be there? I wouldn't know which ones to keep and which to remove. Done. Cheers Jochen

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Hi Hans-Christoph, * Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-23 13:28]: * the descriptions in debian/control still mention avin2. Could you add something about what makes this 'pointclouds' fork different than the official one, and avin2? Done in 579de11. * does

Re: getting openni2 into Debian

Hi, * Hauke Wintjen hwint...@rimpl-consulting.de [2013-11-21 09:30]: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org hat am 20. November 2013 um 20:13 geschrieben: Also, what tool are you building it with? I couldn't get it to build with either dpkg-buildpackage or git-buildpackage. I have

Re: getting openni2 into Debian

* IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at [2013-11-21 10:37]: it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing. if your package has not been in debian yet (which i think is true), you should get rid of any

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-04 14:20]: tarball to build the package from. Here's your git repo: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/openni-sensor-pointclouds.git;a=summary I've just pushed an adapted version there. Can you have a look at it and sponsor it,

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-04 19:59]: Having a dash in the upstream version number will make it tricky since the package version comes after a dash. Also, I think its good to have as simple tag names as possible. Since PrimeSense has long ones, this repo could use very

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-04 14:20]: Looks good. Next step is tagging a release there, so there is an upstream tarball to build the package from. I've just pushed Stable-5.1.0.41-pointclouds-1, can you import it? Otherwise I can do it tomorrow. Here's your git repo:

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-30 12:11]: Patches in a Debian package are not meant for adding new functionality. They are meant to get the code building/working/installing on Debian, and for fixing security bugs. So the package that includes those patches should be named

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-29 10:10]: My question is more the opposite: when do people use the plain version without any of the avin2 patches? I think we should call the current package 'openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect', then leave it open for anyone to make the

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-28 13:26]: At long last, we finally did it! openni is officially part of Debian (and soon it'll be automatically included in Ubuntu). Awesome! Also, is openni-sensor-primesense ready for upload? primesense-nite-nonfree is still waiting in the

Re: openni_1.5.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-28 14:53]: OK, I'll give it one more look and upload it when I have some time. How about openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect? Is that still worth having as a separate package? It's patches are integrated in openni-sensor-primesense.

Re: updating OpenNI Debian packages

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-05-20 16:06]: How about openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect? Is that still relevant? No, it's all integrated into openni-sensor-primesense, so it's working with the original Primesense and the Kinect. Have any of these patches been submitted upstream?

Re: updating OpenNI Debian packages

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-05-20 14:44]: Ok, I uploaded openni-sensor-primesense and osceleton to Debian just now. Awesome, thanks! What about primesense-nite-nonfree? Is there an updated version of that? Is that still needed? I don't use it, so I haven't looked into

Re: updating OpenNI Debian packages

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2012-07-02 10:43]: On Jul 2, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: Great, I've been mailing with Stephen already to get this one into Debian finally. According to [1] there are still some things to sort out: - Did anyone mail upstream

Bug#648593: mplayer2: Endless loop with HTTP files.

Package: mplayer2 Version: 2.0-134-g84d8671-9 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, current mplayer2 in sid loops endless with some HTTP files: % mplayer -playlist http://httpmedia.radiobremen.de/nordwestradio.m3u Resolving httpmedia.radiobremen.de for AF_INET6... Couldn't resolve name for

Bug#648593: mplayer2: Endless loop with HTTP files.

I just found out that you need commit c89f72b as well to make it work. Cheers, Jochen ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: OpenNi in Debian

* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2011-06-19 00:07]: On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:07 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof joc...@sprickerhof.de wrote: * Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2011-06-07 18:47]: On Jun 7, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: * Hans-Christoph Steiner h