Accepted o3dgc 0~20131011-4 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:57:53 +0100 Source: o3dgc Binary: libo3dgc-dev Architecture: source Version: 0~20131011-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Rene Engelhard Description: libo3dgc

Accepted collada2gltf 20140924-5 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 21:31:37 +0100 Source: collada2gltf Binary: libcollada2gltfconvert-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 20140924-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Rene Engelhard

Bug#893203: Acknowledgement (src:collada2gltf: FTBFS with rapidjson 1.0.2)

tag 893203 + upstream tag 893203 + fixed-upstream thanks Hi, it seems current master includes rapidjson 1.0.4: $ grep versi GLTF/dependencies/rapidjson/package.json "version": "1.0.4", so this should be fixed there... A build with my packaging updated (using the internal versions of draco a

Bug#893203: src:collada2gltf: FTBFS with rapidjson 1.0.2

Package: src:collada2gltf Version: 20140924-4 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF/issues/417 Tags: sid Dear Maintainer, as said in the above github issue: " Unfortunately, the (already deprecated in 0.11/0.12 git) FileStream class/filestream.h got removed complete

future of collada2gltf/o3dgc?

Hi, I once pushed packaging of OpenCOLLADA and collada2gltf (and for that one o3dgc and rapidjson) for LibreOffice being able to "import"/render COLLADA. This feature has been removed with LibreOffice 6.0, and that one is now in testing. The TDF library for glTF is already orphaned: #889677) Now

Bug#888664: collada2gltf: missing Vcs-* fields

Hi, On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 02:59:11PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > On 28/01/18 14:45, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 02:34:33PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > >> In my analysis of the multimedia team repositories on alioth I noticed

Bug#888664: collada2gltf: missing Vcs-* fields

tag 888664 + pending thanks Hi, On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 03:45:18PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 02:34:33PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > > In my analysis of the multimedia team repositories on alioth I noticed > > that this repository does not have any Vc

Bug#888664: collada2gltf: missing Vcs-* fields

Hi, On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 02:34:33PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > In my analysis of the multimedia team repositories on alioth I noticed > that this repository does not have any Vcs-* fields, but does have a > repository on both alioth and salsa. I consider that a bug when that one was migrate

Bug#872775: libebml4v5: New upstream release 1.3.5

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 01:59:24PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: >Hi! > >Il 21/ago/2017 09:33, "Christian Marillat" <[1]maril...@debian.org> ha >scritto: >> [...] >> This version is required by the new mkvtoolnix 15.0.0 source. > >No, it's not; please see [1]. checking

Bug#862134: merging drumgizmos 0.9.12 and 0.9.14 changelogs? (was: Re: Processed: tagging 862134)

tag 862134 + patch thanks Hi, On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:45:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > # fixed in 0.9.12 upstream, which is already in drumgizmo.git master > > tags 862134 + pending > Bug #862134 [src:drumgizmo] src:drum

Bug#862134: 1.14, obviously...

retitle 862135 src:zookeeper: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14 AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed) retitle 862134 src:drumgizmo: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14 (AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed) retitle 862133 src:gnuradio: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14 (no C++11 support, required by cppunit) retitle 862132

Bug#862134: src:drumgizmo: FTBFS with cppunit 0.14 (AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed)

Package: src:drumgizmo Version: 0.9.11-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, [ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ] On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with cppunit 0.14: [...] dh build dh_testdir dh_update_autotools_config d

Bug#853802: FTBFS on armhf: cannot find library libmad.so.0

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:34:04AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Sounds like #853793. Actually, not sure. Shouldn't have writen this in my current tired state. Regards, Rene ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-mai

Bug#853802: FTBFS on armhf: cannot find library libmad.so.0

Hi, [ not the maintainer ] On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:23:34AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: [...] >dh_shlibdeps > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library libmad.so.0 needed by > debian/sonic-visualiser/usr/bin/sonic-visualiser (ELF format: > 'elf32-littlearm' abi: '0101002805000400'; RPATH

Bug#806851: VLC doesn't run with root user

[ I am not the vcl maintainer ] On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 06:41:00PM +1100, Daniel Harrison wrote: >This makes it quite difficult to work with on single-user machines where >root is the main account. My suggestion involves modifying it to work with Erm, even on single-user machines ("only m

COLLADA-related packages location (was: Re: [collada-dom] branch master updated (b58c9b1 -> 2b8de90))

Hi, On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:27:15AM +, Wookey wrote: > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > wookey pushed a change to branch master > in repository collada-dom. I just happened to see other the other commits yesterday. Given COLLADA is 3D assets etc, wou

Bug#794276: Aw: Bug#794276: opencollada: FTBFS on mipsel

severity 794276 important thanks It did not build before so it's not serious. Serious is when it built before but not anymore... Regards René -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit GMX Mail gesendet. Arturo Borrero Gonzalez schrieb:

Re: opencollada_0.1.0~20140703.ddf8f47+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:08:37AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:51:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> >> Some files are licensed under LGPL, but I couldn't find the license > >> >> text in the source tarball. Please add it as well. > >

Re: opencollada_0.1.0~20140703.ddf8f47+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:51:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> Some files are licensed under LGPL, but I couldn't find the license > >> text in the source tarball. Please add it as well. ^^ > > > >Hmm? > > > >There's a standalone Lic

Re: opencollada_0.1.0~20140703.ddf8f47+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I don't understand this. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:00:07PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Please add the missing GFDL of some files in Externals/expat/doc/ to > your debian/copyright. doc/xmlmw*, OK. > Some files are licensed under LGPL, but I couldn't find the license > text in the

Re: blender : update to 2.73a : any possibility?

Hi, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:59:00PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > dang, there has been a mix-up, i am running "ubuntu server 14.10". :) > wonder how those folks got hold of blender 2.70a, see below; They somewhen probably got it from somewhere (testing? unstable?) when it existed. As they al

Re: blender : update to 2.73a : any possibility?

Hi, [ I am not the blender maintainer ] On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:13:22PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > hi, > > blender has been updated to version 2.73a while the repos still are > stuck on 2.70a, any hope for a change? Wrong. blender | 2.72.b+dfsg0-3 | jessie | source, amd64, arm6

Bug#694879: blender 2.71 still missing Collada import/export support

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 08:47:43AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: >[2]https://bugs.debian.org/694932 >Don't hold your breath waiting for it, though ;-) >We (Rene and I) are working on it: him for LO, me for Blender. Indeed, though notthing happened much since some time: http://anonscm

Re: xulrunner-dev is gone

Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:47:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not > to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package, > and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are > things missing.

Re: Accepted liblrdf 0.4.0-4 (source amd64)

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 03:10:38PM +, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >[ Adrian Knoth ] >* Explicitly depend on versioned libraptor. > Closes: #613675. Eh, sure? The raptor build with the fixed .shlibs (-3 fixed the versioning, -4 added the missed .shlibs bump) is not yet built on armel a