On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
perhaps it makes sense to (temporarily) disable the postcommit hook
for the calf package, at least until this cdbs black magic stuff has
settled?
I don't think so.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:18:51AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Now that you've seen the horrors/wonders I have done to calf and
Hydrogen, would you mind me similarly tightening JACK?
I would like to add same snippets and use them to more strictly
maintain build-dependencies and
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Do, Feb 11, 2010 at 13:18:40 (CET), j...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Declare build-dependencies indirectly in rules file (not directly
in dontrol file) to ease commenting and manipulation.
whoho, cdbs now
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
perhaps it makes sense to (temporarily) disable the postcommit hook for
the calf package, at least until this cdbs black magic stuff has settled?
I don't think so. I'd like to see what happens to my package. ;)
Deleting the
On Do, Feb 11, 2010 at 14:05:06 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Do, Feb 11, 2010 at 13:18:40 (CET), j...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Declare build-dependencies indirectly in rules file (not directly
in dontrol file) to
