Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

Hi Fabian, Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2015-09-14 07:30:05) > Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2015, 19:58 +0200 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig: >> personally i'm in favour of using it, but i only recently got >> involved. > > For those not involved, could you point me to a *single* advantage of > this

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-14 05:55, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-09-13 22:38 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig > : >> On 09/13/2015 08:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >>> i'm also just building ardour, and if everything goes well >>> will

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

Hi Jaromír, Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2015-09-13 07:41:38) > 2015-09-12 21:25 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > BTW I just edit control file ... not control.in ... > I am still not sure how "control.in" works in cdbs... maybe it is > right time to ask. > > Should I edit control.in

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-13 19:58 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > On 09/13/2015 08:45 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> >>> Should I edit control.in file and regenerate control file? >>> >>> This do the magic? >>> DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL=yes fakeroot debian/rules clean >> >> I just

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/13/2015 08:29 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > I am not very skilled with cdbs, but I believe I will get used by time. > As you and probably Adrian too are fine with control.in file ... I > would say lets use it. i added another note to README.source that explicit mentions control.in and how

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/13/2015 08:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > i'm also just building ardour, and if everything goes well will > (re-build and) upload it to unstable tonight. uploaded. i'll upload the revised version of "ardour3" as soon as "ardour" enters unstable. mfgdsar IOhannes signature.asc

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/13/2015 08:45 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> Should I edit control.in file and regenerate control file? >> >> This do the magic? >> DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL=yes fakeroot debian/rules clean > > I just added a README.source about that. thanks. > > You don't need to use CDBS - e.g.

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-13 22:38 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > On 09/13/2015 08:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> i'm also just building ardour, and if everything goes well will >> (re-build and) upload it to unstable tonight. > > uploaded. > > i'll upload the revised version of

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2015, 19:58 +0200 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig: > personally i'm in favour of using it, but i only recently got involved. For those not involved, could you point me to a *single* advantage of this workflow? The only difference I am able to point out is two nearly identical

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-12 17:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > 2015-09-12 16:30 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : >> On 09/12/2015 09:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> What about introducing ardour-data or ardour-common package? >>> We could ship some files in arch-indep

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-12 21:25 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > 2015-09-12 17:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >> 2015-09-12 16:30 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : >>> On 09/12/2015 09:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > What about introducing

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-11 21:14 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > > Sorry I am not still at my working machine .. :( ... busy day for me I finally get time to build ardour ... I: ardour: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/ardour4/ardour-4.2.0 ABitrate Arbitrate I: ardour:

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-12 16:30 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > On 09/12/2015 09:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> I: ardour: font-in-non-font-package usr/share/ardour4/ArdourMono.ttf >> >> Same here ... ArdourMono.ttf is not font file > > what else is it? > > $ file

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/12/2015 09:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-09-11 21:14 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >> >> Sorry I am not still at my working machine .. :( ... busy day for me > > I finally get time to build ardour ... > > I: ardour: spelling-error-in-binary

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2015, 23:46 +0200 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig: > the new "ardour" package will be exactly a single "ardour" binary > package (no more -dbg, -i686 and -altivec packages) - should we add > "Provides" for those who need that? Cleanest solution would be to provide transitional

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-11 16:42 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > On 09/11/2015 04:24 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> >>> anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding >>> DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg >>> to the rules, there's no reason not to do it... >>

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-11 21:48 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > On 09/11/2015 09:14 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> >> What about renaming man pages from ardour4.1 to ardour.1 ? also entry >> in ardour.manpages file >> Same for ardour4.xpm -> ardour.xpm and entry in menu file > > but is

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

Am Freitag, den 11.09.2015, 21:14 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: > ifneq (,$(findstring :$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU):,:amd64:)) > CXXFLAGS+=-msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse > endif Please don't second-guess the compiler, it will choose "the right flags" [tm] on amd64. - Fabian signature.asc Description:

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 09:14 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > What about renaming man pages from ardour4.1 to ardour.1 ? also entry > in ardour.manpages file > Same for ardour4.xpm -> ardour.xpm and entry in menu file but is there any harm in having them called "ardour4"? > > Now when we will have just one

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 10:38 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> >>> There are also ardour4 entry in desktop file ... are they correct? >>> >> >> dunno, they look fine to me; >> do you have anything specific in mind. > > I just was not sure if binary now build is really ardour4 or just ardour > > ah i see.

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 03:57 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> the new "ardour" package will be exactly a single "ardour" binary >> package (no more -dbg, -i686 and -altivec packages) - should we add >> "Provides" for those who need that? > > No sure about -i686 and -altivec i created transitional packages, as

Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

Now to the list :( -- Forwarded message -- From: Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mi...@gmail.com> Date: 2015-09-11 16:24 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing To: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at> 2015-09-11 15:26 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zm

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 04:24 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> >> anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding >> DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg >> to the rules, there's no reason not to do it... > > That would be great! Thank you IOhannes! > well, done and pushed. btw,

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-11 16:42 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > On 09/11/2015 04:24 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> >>> anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding >>> DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg >>> to the rules, there's no reason not to do it... >>

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> This still stands, I just uploaded 4.2 under the old name "ardour3" due > >> to lack of time. > >> Just mentioning. Whoever has spare cycles, feel free to go ahead. > > > > so what would the transition look like? > > > >

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-10 11:40 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> >> This still stands, I just uploaded 4.2 under the old name "ardour3" due >> >> to lack of time. >> >> Just mentioning. Whoever has spare cycles, feel free

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/10/2015 09:34 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 09/10/2015 12:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> >> IOhannes can you please look at it? I am not sure if wouldn't mess it :( > > working on it. ok, pushed both ardour3 and ardour. needs testing of upgrading & coninstallability before an upload.

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-09-10 23:46 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > On 09/10/2015 09:34 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> On 09/10/2015 12:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> >>> IOhannes can you please look at it? I am not sure if wouldn't mess it :( >> >> working on it. > > ok, pushed both

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/10/2015 12:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > IOhannes can you please look at it? I am not sure if wouldn't mess it :( working on it. gfmadsr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/10/2015 11:40 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> it will loose the git packaging history of ardour3. > I don't think so (as explained above): > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/ardour3.git/log/ i *think* i meant that the ardour repository will not contain the history from the

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 2015-08-25 15:29, Adrian Knoth wrote: This still stands, I just uploaded 4.2 under the old name ardour3 due to lack of time. Just mentioning. Whoever has spare cycles, feel free to go ahead. so what would the transition look like? ardour3 package: - switch back to master branch. -

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 07/20/15 16:28, Adrian Knoth wrote: Ardour3 version 4.1 Seriously? http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-April/043650.html This exactly. It may not be a big deal (new versions of ardour an load old sessions), but for a bit-exact re-export of older

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 07/09/15 11:41, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: FYI: The status of the ardour3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.0~dfsg1-1 Current version: 4.1~dfsg-1 Ardour3 version 4.1 Seriously?

ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the ardour3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.0~dfsg1-1 Current version: 4.1~dfsg-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 07/08/2015 06:39 PM, Debian testing watch wrote: FYI: The status of the ardour3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.0~dfsg1-1 Current version: 4.1~dfsg-1 Ardour3 version 4.1 Seriously? Why is the package name not Ardour4? Can this be