Re: concerning llibva backport

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:26:58PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > On 23/08/16 23:30, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > On 7 August 2016 at 09:12, James Cowgill wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 06/08/16 22:58, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >>> On 6 August 2016 at 05:12, Sebastian

Re: concerning llibva backport

Hi, On 06/08/16 22:58, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > On 6 August 2016 at 05:12, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >> On 2016-08-05 16:03:39, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >>> Hi Sebastian, >>> >>> I did a fresh build of libva-1.7.1-1~bpo+1 today, and noticed that it >>> was building

Re: concerning llibva backport

On 5 August 2016 at 18:30, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 5 August 2016 at 18:15, James Cowgill wrote: >> On 05/08/16 22:47, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On 5 August 2016 at 17:24, James Cowgill wrote: On 05/08/16 21:03, Nicholas D

Re: concerning llibva backport

On 5 August 2016 at 18:15, James Cowgill wrote: > On 05/08/16 22:47, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 5 August 2016 at 17:24, James Cowgill wrote: >>> On 05/08/16 21:03, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: Hi Sebastian, I did a fresh build of

Re: concerning llibva backport

On 05/08/16 22:47, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 5 August 2016 at 17:24, James Cowgill wrote: >> On 05/08/16 21:03, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >>> Hi Sebastian, >>> >>> I did a fresh build of libva-1.7.1-1~bpo+1 today, and noticed that it >>> was building against

Re: concerning llibva backport

Hi, On 05/08/16 21:03, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > I did a fresh build of libva-1.7.1-1~bpo+1 today, and noticed that it > was building against mesa-10.3.2-1+deb8u1 from Jessie. I've been > testing it on a Jessie+backported mesa-11.1.3-1~bpo8+1, and the > packages I've been

Re: concerning llibva backport

On 5 August 2016 at 09:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2016-07-29 06:40:07, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> On 29 July 2016 at 06:28, wrote: >> > The branch, jessie-backports has been created >> > at