Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 16:09:53 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:36, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: So I have a few questions about this plan: - if all implementations of libjack are

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Reinhard, On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a libjack0-0.118+svn3796 package, AIUI. I don't understand why the current libjack0

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:26:38 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: Hi Julien, On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a libjack0-0.118+svn3796

Re: [SCM] scenic packaging branch, master, updated. debian/0.5.11-1-38-gbefa689

2010-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[sent again to proper list] On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:33:52PM +, alexandrequessy-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit a4cd700d247cdc6ab70bec866bd610c5385341d2 Author: Alexandre Quessy Alexandre Quessy alexan...@quessy.net

Bug#584795: snd: module xg not included

2010-06-06 Thread John Foerch
Package: snd Version: 11.4-1 Severity: wishlist Some features of snd depend on a module called xg. It can be included as a dynamic library (make xg), or built into snd with the --with-static-xg configure option. For details about this, start snd and enter into the lisp listener: (load

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:12, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: My idea was to have the j-a-c-k (jackd2) package provide the non-virtual package libjack0, just like today.  I didn't think it was important which libjack implementation apps build against, and this seemed the easiest /

Processing of snd_11.6-1_amd64.changes

2010-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator
snd_11.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: snd_11.6-1.dsc snd_11.6.orig.tar.gz snd_11.6-1.diff.gz snd_11.6-1_all.deb snd-doc_11.6-1_all.deb snd-gtk-jack_11.6-1_amd64.deb snd-gtk-pulse_11.6-1_amd64.deb snd-nox_11.6-1_amd64.deb

Bug#584795: marked as done (snd: module xg not included)

2010-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:02:38 + with message-id e1olkbc-0007an...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#584795: fixed in snd 11.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #584795, regarding snd: module xg not included to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processing of traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator
traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: traverso_0.49.1-1.dsc traverso_0.49.1.orig.tar.gz traverso_0.49.1-1.debian.tar.gz traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)

traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: traverso_0.49.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.1-1.debian.tar.gz traverso_0.49.1-1.dsc to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.1-1.dsc traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.deb to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.deb traverso_0.49.1.orig.tar.gz to

Bug#521687: marked as done (traverso: New upstream release)

2010-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:32:26 + with message-id e1olke2-00013d...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#521687: fixed in traverso 0.49.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #521687, regarding traverso: New upstream release to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processing of yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.changes

2010-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator
yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yoshimi_0.058-1.dsc yoshimi_0.058.orig.tar.bz2 yoshimi_0.058-1.debian.tar.gz yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.deb yoshimi-data_0.058-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: yoshimi-data_0.058-1_all.deb to main/y/yoshimi/yoshimi-data_0.058-1_all.deb yoshimi_0.058-1.debian.tar.gz to main/y/yoshimi/yoshimi_0.058-1.debian.tar.gz yoshimi_0.058-1.dsc to main/y/yoshimi/yoshimi_0.058-1.dsc yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.deb to

Bug#584644: marked as done (yoshimi-data: missing recommends on yoshimi)

2010-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:55:28 + with message-id e1oll0k-0003uo...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#584644: fixed in yoshimi 0.058-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #584644, regarding yoshimi-data: missing recommends on yoshimi to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: [Matroska-devel] Incompatible API changes between libebml 0.7.7 and 0.8.1?

2010-06-06 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 11:30 +0200 schrieb Cristian Morales Vega: 2010/6/4 Moritz Bunkus mor...@bunkus.org: Hey guys, great links, thanks for those. Here's what we decided to do: 1. We generally aim for binary compatibility and increase LIBRARY_SO_VER in the Makefiles if a