Re: [SCM] bangarang packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.0.beta2-1-19-gd74ae09
On Do, Jan 07, 2010 at 05:13:20 (CET), ryanakca-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 15180ee4bca33277b82c732046b77dd518109ac3 Author: Ryan Kavanagh ryana...@kubuntu.org Date: Fri Jan 1 21:18:04 2010 -0500 Imported Upstream version 1.0~beta3 This is not how to use git packaging branches. The common practice is to update the 'upstream' branch and then merge into the master branch. Importing it directly into the master branch makes it very difficult to track what has changed upstream and thus, misses totally the point of packaging branches. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master, updated. debian/0.5+svn20090706-2ubuntu5.ppa2-9-g24615a2
Am 07.01.2010 10:38, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Because I did not get the green light from the release team for that yet but I finally found some time yesterday to prepare the package. So I've decided to proceed anyway and upload my result to experimental. Fine, thanks! -- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath Ruhr-Universität Bochum Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT) Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134 D-44780 Bochum Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334 Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227 E-Mail: greffr...@leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Jack2 in debian
Od: Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com www.ladish.org Interesting. Jaromír, what do you think about working together on that? I just watched http://www.ladish.org/wiki/demovideo ... looks interesting ... You will setup repo? I can start work on it in the evening ... regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Jack2 in debian
Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Od: Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com www.ladish.org Interesting. Jaromír, what do you think about working together on that? I just watched http://www.ladish.org/wiki/demovideo ... looks interesting ... You will setup repo? I can start work on it in the evening ... I suggest you to talk about it with the author, Nedko on #ladi @ freenode. He did some packaging for Ubuntu in the past and he is willing to help you, I'm sure about that. \r ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] bangarang packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.0.beta2-1-19-gd74ae09
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 15180ee4bca33277b82c732046b77dd518109ac3 Author: Ryan Kavanagh ryana...@kubuntu.org Date: Fri Jan 1 21:18:04 2010 -0500 Imported Upstream version 1.0~beta3 This is not how to use git packaging branches. The common practice is to update the 'upstream' branch and then merge into the master branch. Importing it directly into the master branch makes it very difficult to track what has changed upstream and thus, misses totally the point of packaging branches. Hi, I think this was my fault. Sorry. I had uploaded the 1.0~beta3 to a separate branch called beta3 in the debian repository. Should I had been calling it 'upstream' and basically from time to time pull the changes from bangarang master on gitorious? If not please be so nice and provide a link to the proper usage. I would really appreciate it. Cheers, Andreas Marschke. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#498174: libmms0: Please include support for extended stream properties
It seems upstream released a new version a while ago. However, this patch was not applied. Also, there exists now another patch doing the same in an upstream bugreport: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libmms/+bug/381782 -- Anssi Hannula ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#563483: closed by Christophe Mutricy xto...@videolan.org (Bug#563483: fixed in vlc 1.0.4-2)
On Fr, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:39:31 (CET), James Vega wrote: On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 10:51:13AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Source: vlc Source-Version: 1.0.4-2 [snip] * Move back hotkeys to vlc-nox (Closes: #563477) * Fix Replaces/Conflicts version so that upgrade work (Closes: #563476, #563483) See #560896 for why Package: vlc Version: 1.0.4-2 Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.0.4-2) Conflicts: vlc-nox ( 1.0.4-2) Package: vlc-nox Version: 1.0.4-2 Conflicts: vlc ( 1.0.4-2) is broken. That bugreport has very long discussion threads, and after skimming them, I didn't understand how that bug relates to this situation. Here in vlc, both conflicts are versioned. Both apt and aptitude should be able to find the obvious solution: pick the latest version of both packages. How can this cause problems? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#563483: closed by Christophe Mutricy xto...@videolan.org (Bug#563483: fixed in vlc 1.0.4-2)
Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Fr, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:39:31 (CET), James Vega wrote: On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 10:51:13AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Source: vlc Source-Version: 1.0.4-2 [snip] * Move back hotkeys to vlc-nox (Closes: #563477) * Fix Replaces/Conflicts version so that upgrade work (Closes: #563476, #563483) See #560896 for why Package: vlc Version: 1.0.4-2 Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.0.4-2) Conflicts: vlc-nox ( 1.0.4-2) Package: vlc-nox Version: 1.0.4-2 Conflicts: vlc ( 1.0.4-2) is broken. That bugreport has very long discussion threads, and after skimming them, I didn't understand how that bug relates to this situation. Here in vlc, both conflicts are versioned. Both apt and aptitude should be able to find the obvious solution: pick the latest version of both packages. How can this cause problems? New vlc needs vlc-nox to be installed first, but the new vlc-nox conflicts with the installed version of vlc... Cheers Luk ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
