Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 11:30 +0200 schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
> 2010/6/4 Moritz Bunkus :
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > great links, thanks for those. Here's what we decided to do:
> >
> > 1. We generally aim for binary compatibility and increase LIBRARY_SO_VER
> > in the Makefiles if a release isn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jonas and the list!
On 10-06-05 03:51 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Lower that package relation to suggests, and document the benefit of
> installing that suggestion (without explaining the reason it is only
> suggested, that is development-grad
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:55:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#584644: fixed in yoshimi 0.058-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #584644,
regarding yoshimi-data: missing recommends on yoshimi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Accepted:
yoshimi-data_0.058-1_all.deb
to main/y/yoshimi/yoshimi-data_0.058-1_all.deb
yoshimi_0.058-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/y/yoshimi/yoshimi_0.058-1.debian.tar.gz
yoshimi_0.058-1.dsc
to main/y/yoshimi/yoshimi_0.058-1.dsc
yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.deb
to main/y/yoshimi/yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.
yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yoshimi_0.058-1.dsc
yoshimi_0.058.orig.tar.bz2
yoshimi_0.058-1.debian.tar.gz
yoshimi_0.058-1_amd64.deb
yoshimi-data_0.058-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.de
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:32:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#521687: fixed in traverso 0.49.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #521687,
regarding traverso: New upstream release
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Accepted:
traverso_0.49.1-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.1-1.debian.tar.gz
traverso_0.49.1-1.dsc
to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.1-1.dsc
traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.deb
traverso_0.49.1.orig.tar.gz
to main/t/traverso/traverso_0
traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
traverso_0.49.1-1.dsc
traverso_0.49.1.orig.tar.gz
traverso_0.49.1-1.debian.tar.gz
traverso_0.49.1-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:02:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#584795: fixed in snd 11.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #584795,
regarding snd: module xg not included
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Accepted:
snd-doc_11.6-1_all.deb
to main/s/snd/snd-doc_11.6-1_all.deb
snd-gtk-jack_11.6-1_amd64.deb
to main/s/snd/snd-gtk-jack_11.6-1_amd64.deb
snd-gtk-pulse_11.6-1_amd64.deb
to main/s/snd/snd-gtk-pulse_11.6-1_amd64.deb
snd-nox-alsa_11.6-1_all.deb
to main/s/snd/snd-nox-alsa_11.6-1_all.de
snd_11.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
snd_11.6-1.dsc
snd_11.6.orig.tar.gz
snd_11.6-1.diff.gz
snd_11.6-1_all.deb
snd-doc_11.6-1_all.deb
snd-gtk-jack_11.6-1_amd64.deb
snd-gtk-pulse_11.6-1_amd64.deb
snd-nox_11.6-1_amd64.deb
snd-nox-alsa_11.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:12, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> My idea was to have the j-a-c-k (jackd2) package provide the non-virtual
>> package libjack0, just like today. I didn't think it was important
>> which libjack implementation apps build against, and this seemed the
>> easiest / least disrup
Package: snd
Version: 11.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Some features of snd depend on a module called xg. It can be included as
a dynamic library (make xg), or built into snd with the --with-static-xg
configure option. For details about this, start snd and enter into the
lisp listener:
(load "xm-en
[sent again to proper list]
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:33:52PM +,
alexandrequessy-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit a4cd700d247cdc6ab70bec866bd610c5385341d2
Author: Alexandre Quessy
Date: Sat Jun 5 13:23:10 2010 -0400
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:26:38 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>> On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> > Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a
>> > libjack0-0
Hi Reinhard,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a
> > libjack0-0.118+svn3796 package, AIUI. I don't understand why the
> > current lib
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 16:09:53 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > So I have a few questions about this plan:
>> > - if all implementations of libjack are binary-compatible, th
17 matches
Mail list logo