Am 18.06.2011 10:54, schrieb A Mennucc:
accordind to debian/copyright both source packages above are
tracking libav.org ... wouldn't it be better if the latter would be
used to track (and maybe package) the ffmpeg.org codebase ?
In this (or at least related) context...
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:05:36 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 18.06.2011 10:54, schrieb A Mennucc:
accordind to debian/copyright both source packages above are
tracking libav.org ... wouldn't it be better if the latter would be
used to track (and maybe package) the ffmpeg.org codebase
Am 22.06.2011 10:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Neat, no? I'm busy preparing the Libav 0.7 release, then FFmpeg does a
git merge from libav.org and quickly publishes both 0.7 and 0.8.
Cool, uh?
I just don't get it.
Why does he merge back the code of the fork that split off of ffmpeg
for his
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:47:01 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 22.06.2011 10:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Neat, no? I'm busy preparing the Libav 0.7 release, then FFmpeg does a
git merge from libav.org and quickly publishes both 0.7 and 0.8.
Cool, uh?
I just don't get it.
Why does
Am 22.06.2011 11:00, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
He doesn't merge everything, only stuff that he likes.
But the release announcement says:
...it includes all changes from ffmpeg-mt and libav.
^^^^
___
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Jeremy Salwen jeremysal...@gmail.com wrote:
Alessio, in the workflow you described, the upstream.trunk branch is what I
was referring to as intermediate packaging work
I have an account on alioth (jeremysalwen-guest) and I requested to join the
team a little
Adrian,
I've been reviewing ardour3 to upload it soon, please ask upstream to
fix the following licensing issues:
Files: ./gtk2_ardour/canvas-imageframe.c,
./gtk2_ardour/canvas-imageframe.h
Copyright: 1998, The Free Software Foundation
License: UNKNOWN
FIXME
Those files completely
FYI: The status of the pd-plugin source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.2.1-2
Current version: 0.2.1-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the phasex source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.12.0+m1-3
Current version: 0.12.0+m1-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 23:50, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
A gentle ping looking for an upload. I'd love to make the Ubuntu/oneiric
import deadline.
Uploaded, with some modifications (in this case, given the import
deadline I just went ahead with it instead of pointing out
pd-moonlib_0.2-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-moonlib_0.2-2.dsc
pd-moonlib_0.2.orig.tar.gz
pd-moonlib_0.2-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-moonlib_0.2-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc
pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:47:18 +
with message-id e1qzx8g-0007fy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#629700: fixed in pd-bassemu 0.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629700,
regarding pd-bassemu: FTBFS: bassemu~.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file
or directory
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
wrote:
Here are my lowest priority uploads, but I hope to get them uploaded in
time
to be
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.dsc
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.dsc
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.dsc
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
Accepted:
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-boids/pd-boids_1.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc
to main/p/pd-boids/pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc
pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-boids/pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc -
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:02:36 +
with message-id e1qzxnu-5p...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#629701: fixed in pd-beatpipe 0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629701,
regarding pd-beatpipe: FTBFS: beatpipe.c:26:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such
file or directory
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:02:43 +
with message-id e1qzxnb-8l...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#629702: fixed in pd-boids 1.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #629702,
regarding pd-boids: FTBFS: boids2d.c:20:22: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file
or directory (lacks
21 matches
Mail list logo
