Fwd: [Open Octave Development] New Anouncement List

2011-10-08 Thread rosea grammostola



 Original Message 
Subject:[Open Octave Development] New Anouncement List
Date:   Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:26:36 -0600
From:   Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
Reply-To:   developm...@openoctave.org
To: developm...@openoctave.org, m...@openoctave.org



*Note to distro packaging specialists*. We've created an announce 
mailing list for news and developments for OOM, including announcements 
for tarball releases. You may miss the thrills and overwhelming 
excitement of our regular mailing lists, but the announce ML will keep 
you informed, so you can package from the latest builds. We hope you 
take advantage of this, and keep all of our shared users up to date with 
the latest features and developments from the OpenOctave team. Thanks!


To subscribe to the announce mailing list, send an email to:

*announce-subscr...@openoctave.org 
mailto:announce-subscr...@openoctave.org*


and then send mail to:

*annou...@openoctave.org mailto:annou...@openoctave.org*


--
Christopher Cherrett
ccherr...@openoctave.org
http://www.openoctave.org

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Fwd: [Open Octave Development] New Anouncement List

2011-10-08 Thread Reinhard Tartler

Hi,

it seems to me we don't even have the package in Debian yet, altough
there is an ITP (#578787), and a git repo:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/oomidi.git

It seems to me that 'oomidi' might not be the best name for the
package. How about renaming it to openoctave?

Just to clarify, Jonas, Adrian, are you still interested and working on
the package? I personally won't have time and hardware to work on it,
but it seems to me that the package is a bit in the limbo since April.

In any case, I think a working package and a watch file is more useful
for pkg-multimedia than subscribing to yet another mailinglist. But YMMV.

Cheers,
Reinhard

On Sa, Okt 08, 2011 at 11:20:51 (CEST), rosea grammostola wrote:

  Original Message 
 Subject:  [Open Octave Development] New Anouncement List
 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:26:36 -0600
 From: Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
 Reply-To: developm...@openoctave.org
 To:   developm...@openoctave.org, m...@openoctave.org



 *Note to distro packaging specialists*. We've created an announce
 mailing list for news and developments for OOM, including announcements
 for tarball releases. You may miss the thrills and overwhelming
 excitement of our regular mailing lists, but the announce ML will keep
 you informed, so you can package from the latest builds. We hope you
 take advantage of this, and keep all of our shared users up to date with
 the latest features and developments from the OpenOctave team. Thanks!

 To subscribe to the announce mailing list, send an email to:

 *announce-subscr...@openoctave.org
 mailto:announce-subscr...@openoctave.org*

 and then send mail to:

 *annou...@openoctave.org mailto:annou...@openoctave.org*

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


libmatroska_1.3.0-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-10-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
libmatroska-dev_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
  to main/libm/libmatroska/libmatroska-dev_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
libmatroska5_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
  to main/libm/libmatroska/libmatroska5_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
libmatroska_1.3.0-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/libm/libmatroska/libmatroska_1.3.0-1.debian.tar.gz
libmatroska_1.3.0-1.dsc
  to main/libm/libmatroska/libmatroska_1.3.0-1.dsc
libmatroska_1.3.0.orig.tar.bz2
  to main/libm/libmatroska/libmatroska_1.3.0.orig.tar.bz2


Override entries for your package:
libmatroska-dev_1.3.0-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel
libmatroska5_1.3.0-1_i386.deb - optional libs
libmatroska_1.3.0-1.dsc - source libs

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#624274: marked as done (produces invalid streams)

2011-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:22:36 +0200
with message-id 
cabwz6or6trzoj4dn0vxu6x62z1z8v3_arqfqbm8+q3tksf-...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Fixed in 0.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #624274,
regarding produces invalid streams
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624274
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libvo-aacenc0
Version: 0.1.0~rc1-1
Severity: normal

Streams produced by libvo-aacenc0 as present in package
0.1.0~rc1-1 produces invalid streams, including with the
example provided upstream.

This can be noticed with mplayer for instance, which logs
the following errors:
A:  36.5 (36.5) of 0.0 (unknown)  2.8% 18%
[aac @ 0xe57c60]Input buffer exhausted before END element found
A:  48.2 (48.2) of 0.0 (unknown)  3.0% 19%
[aac @ 0xe57c60]channel element 3.8 is not allocated
A:  60.4 (01:00.4) of 0.0 (unknown)  3.0% 17%
[aac @ 0xe57c60]Input buffer exhausted before END element found
A:  86.3 (01:26.3) of 0.0 (unknown)  2.9% 19%
[aac @ 0xe57c60]channel element 3.8 is not allocated
A:  90.7 (01:30.6) of 0.0 (unknown)  2.9% 18%
[aac @ 0xe57c60]Pulse data corrupt or invalid.

The same problems are noticed by faad.

There seems to be an updated version of the original
codebase there:
  https://github.com/mstorsjo/vo-aacenc

This version does not appear to have this issue.

Romain

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libvo-aacenc0 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.11.2-13  Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib

libvo-aacenc0 recommends no packages.

libvo-aacenc0 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 0.1.1-1

---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

buen día

2011-10-08 Thread info
Bienvenido anuestro sitio webWeb: bodoeo.comque vende principalmenteproductos electrónicos.todos nuestrosproductos son nuevos yoriginales,queson las más grandeswholesellerelectrónica.por lo quepuede ofrecerel 70%de descuento entodos nuestros productos,si usted está interesadoen nuestros productos,póngase en contacto connosotros¿Te gustaríatener un buen día___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processing of rtirq_20111007-1_amd64.changes

2011-10-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rtirq_20111007-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  rtirq_20111007-1.dsc
  rtirq_20111007.orig.tar.gz
  rtirq_20111007-1.debian.tar.gz
  rtirq-init_20111007-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


rtirq_20111007-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-10-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
rtirq-init_20111007-1_all.deb
  to main/r/rtirq/rtirq-init_20111007-1_all.deb
rtirq_20111007-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/r/rtirq/rtirq_20111007-1.debian.tar.gz
rtirq_20111007-1.dsc
  to main/r/rtirq/rtirq_20111007-1.dsc
rtirq_20111007.orig.tar.gz
  to main/r/rtirq/rtirq_20111007.orig.tar.gz


Override entries for your package:
rtirq-init_20111007-1_all.deb - optional misc
rtirq_20111007-1.dsc - source misc

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: pd-hid caught in unstable, but why?

2011-10-08 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner


On Oct 8, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Simon Wise wrote:


On 08/10/11 12:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:


On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Simon Wise wrote:


On 07/10/11 23:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:


I was just checking in on my packages, it seems that pd-hid is  
caught in

unstable for 75 days, but I can't figure out what the issue is. The
error message is Adding pd-hid makes 1 non-depending packages
uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64: pd-hid 

http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pd-hid;expand=1

But what is that 1 non-depending package? Is it 'puredata  
(0.43)'?

Other packages with that same Build-Depends are already in testing.


The package is listed as pd-hid itself ... apparently it is not  
installable on

kfreebsd-amd64, that is what is keeping it out of testing


That's odd, because buildd seems to show it as installed on kFreeBSD:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pd-hid


It says that moving pd-hid to testing prevents pd-hid from  
installing on testing in kfreebsd-amd64 [and maybe more  
architectures, only the first found is listed].


Since it IS installed on sid, is there something missing from  
testing, but present in sid, that pd-hid needs before it can be  
installed? something that is not listed as a dependency, but should  
be?


Simon


pd-hid was written in 2004-2005 and uses the Linux input.h.  It's had  
bug fixes since then, but no major changes.  I can't imagine what pd- 
hid would need that wouldn't be in oldstable, or sarge even.  Any  
ideas on how I can find details on what the issue is?


.hc



The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther  
King, Jr.




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers