Processing of rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.changes
rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rosegarden_11.11.42-1.dsc rosegarden_11.11.42.orig.tar.bz2 rosegarden_11.11.42-1.debian.tar.gz rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb rosegarden-dbg_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: rosegarden-dbg_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb to main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden-dbg_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb rosegarden_11.11.42-1.debian.tar.gz to main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_11.11.42-1.debian.tar.gz rosegarden_11.11.42-1.dsc to main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_11.11.42-1.dsc rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb to main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb rosegarden_11.11.42.orig.tar.bz2 to main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_11.11.42.orig.tar.bz2 Override entries for your package: rosegarden-dbg_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb - extra debug rosegarden_11.11.42-1.dsc - source sound rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb - extra sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rosegarden override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of qtractor_0.5.2-1_amd64.changes
qtractor_0.5.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: qtractor_0.5.2-1.dsc qtractor_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz qtractor_0.5.2-1.debian.tar.gz qtractor_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb qtractor-dbg_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
qtractor_0.5.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: qtractor-dbg_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb to main/q/qtractor/qtractor-dbg_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb qtractor_0.5.2-1.debian.tar.gz to main/q/qtractor/qtractor_0.5.2-1.debian.tar.gz qtractor_0.5.2-1.dsc to main/q/qtractor/qtractor_0.5.2-1.dsc qtractor_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb to main/q/qtractor/qtractor_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb qtractor_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz to main/q/qtractor/qtractor_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: qtractor-dbg_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb - extra debug qtractor_0.5.2-1.dsc - source sound qtractor_0.5.2-1_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Tartini
Hi all, I have pushed packaging for Tartini ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515003) to a new repository on alioth. Could someone review that I'm doing it correctly? Thanks, Jeremy ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Invitation to join the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team
Hi Alessio, I've figured out the alioth SSH issues. Now I have a question about the build process: I have some changes which I merged into UPSTREAM.trunk. Now I want to package them as a new release. Normally I would use git-buildpackage to automatically generate a .orig tarball from my upstream branch. But with this workflow I'm only modifying the upstream branch by doing a git-import-orig, so I need to get a tarball before I run git-buildpackage at all. Is there another way to easily turn a commit on UPSTREAM.trunk into a source tarball ready for import into upstream? Jeremy On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.orgwrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Jeremy Salwen jeremysal...@gmail.com wrote: I'm logging in as jeremysalwen-guest. I don't know :( Please have a look at this: http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Tartini
Hi! On 24/12/2011 11:39, Jeremy Salwen wrote: Could someone review that I'm doing it correctly? Disclaimer: I'm not a DD nor a DM. Just a sponsored packager ;-) Now, my few (cosmetic) notes. debian/control: * Standards-Version: why not trying to upgrade it to actual version? * VCS-links should point to debian-related stuff, not upstream debian/copyright: you need to re-work it all, to be more DEP-5 compliant [1] debian/rules: remove all useless commented stuff debian/watch: same as rules I must admit I didn't try to build it, but I guess it should at least compile, after 6 months of work on it :-) Take care and Merry Xmas. mfv [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Tartini
On 11-12-24 at 12:07pm, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: * Standards-Version: why not trying to upgrade it to actual version? Please beware that asking a negated question is impolite: Similar to when did you stop beating your spouse? it implies an accusation. I guess the intend was not why do you do it inferior... but rather the more polite please consider doing it superior More polite, and easier to discuss the quality of your suggestion when the alternative is not put on trial. :-) debian/copyright: you need to re-work it all, to be more DEP-5 compliant [1] DEP-5 is cool, and personally I use it always, but beware that it is optional. (unless perhaps mandatory within this team without me noticing?) Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#653173: audacious: new upstream 3.2-alpha1 (bye bye libmowgli!)
Package: audacious Version: 2.4.4-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, This is still an alpha1 version but no more libmowgli dependency (regarding http://audacious-media-player.org/news/7-audacious-3-2-alpha1-released and a compilation try), so may be a good experimental target! Regards, Patrice. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages audacious depends on: ii audacious-plugins2.4.4-1+b2 ii dbus 1.5.8-1 ii dbus-x11 1.5.8-1 ii gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-2 ii libaudclient22.4.4-1 ii libaudcore1 2.4.4-1 ii libc62.13-23 ii libdbus-1-3 1.5.8-1 ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.98-1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.24.0-2 ii libglib2.0-0 2.30.2-4 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.8-2 ii libice6 2:1.0.7-2 ii libmcs1 0.7.2-2 ii libmowgli2 0.7.1-1 ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-2 Versions of packages audacious recommends: ii unzip 6.0-5 audacious suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#653173: audacious: new upstream 3.2-alpha1 (bye bye libmowgli!)
On 12/24/2011 06:23 PM, Patrice Duroux wrote: Package: audacious Version: 2.4.4-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, This is still an alpha1 version but no more libmowgli dependency (regarding http://audacious-media-player.org/news/7-audacious-3-2-alpha1-released and a compilation try), so may be a good experimental target! Regards, Patrice. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages audacious depends on: ii audacious-plugins2.4.4-1+b2 ii dbus 1.5.8-1 ii dbus-x11 1.5.8-1 ii gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-2 ii libaudclient22.4.4-1 ii libaudcore1 2.4.4-1 ii libc62.13-23 ii libdbus-1-3 1.5.8-1 ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.98-1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.24.0-2 ii libglib2.0-0 2.30.2-4 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.8-2 ii libice6 2:1.0.7-2 ii libmcs1 0.7.2-2 ii libmowgli2 0.7.1-1 ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-2 Versions of packages audacious recommends: ii unzip 6.0-5 audacious suggests no packages. -- no debconf information Hi Patrice. I agree, I think a 3.2-alpha1 could land on experimental as a preparation for the 3.2 stable version to be (we hope) included in Debian Testing before the freeze in July 2012. Thanks. -- Cyril Davromaniak Lavier ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Tartini
On 24/12/2011 18:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Please beware that asking a negated question is impolite: Similar to when did you stop beating your spouse? it implies an accusation. Gosh! Never meant to be so rude. :-( Sorry. I guess the intend was not why do you do it inferior... but rather the more polite please consider doing it superior More polite, and easier to discuss the quality of your suggestion when the alternative is not put on trial. :-) Right. Sorry again. My english is so bad that I find hard sometimes to express myself the right way. Mine was a suggestion and really not intended to be unpolite. debian/copyright: you need to re-work it all, to be more DEP-5 compliant [1] DEP-5 is cool, and personally I use it always, but beware that it is optional. OK. When I started packaging few months ago, guys at debian-mentors told me that copyright is very important for Debian and it would have been nice providing something well done, maybe in DEP-5. So I thought it was the option of choice, even though not mandatory. (unless perhaps mandatory within this team without me noticing?) I guess not ;-) Regards, - Jonas Merry Xmas to you all, DMM guys! -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi RE.VE.SE. s.n.c. Servizi Tecnici Via Brigata Liguria, 46 36012 - Asiago (VI) e-mail: m.vescovi (at) revese (dot) it web: http://www.revese.it Tel.: +39-0424-462767 Fax.: +39-0424-464393 -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
[no subject]
Hello, We are currently Offering internatioanl Loan to coporate companies and private individuals at a low and affordable interest rate of 3% for 1 year to 30 years duration of the repayment period, our loan amount is ranging from USD5,000 to USD5 million. For more details E-mail: kiddfrnkfina...@gmail.com OR palmer.p.tho...@movmail.com Empower your Business with BlackBerry® and Mobile Solutions from T-Mobile. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Tartini
On 11-12-24 at 09:31pm, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: On 24/12/2011 18:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Please beware that asking a negated question is impolite: Similar to when did you stop beating your spouse? it implies an accusation. Gosh! Never meant to be so rude. :-( Sorry. Uhm, just impolite - most folks won't even notice it. I just happen to be nitpicking with words, and find mechanisms like this interesting. debian/copyright: you need to re-work it all, to be more DEP-5 compliant [1] DEP-5 is cool, and personally I use it always, but beware that it is optional. OK. When I started packaging few months ago, guys at debian-mentors told me that copyright is very important for Debian and it would have been nice providing something well done, maybe in DEP-5. So I thought it was the option of choice, even though not mandatory. Makes sense. ...and if you do use DEP-5 then you should ensure that you follow the standard. I was just reacting on the phrasing of the response, which could be misread as DEP-5 formatting of debian/copyright is mandatory. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
