Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Am 23.02.2012 23:01, schrieb Benjamin Drung: Are VLC 2.0.0 and Audacity 2.0.0~rc4 (soon 2.0.0) worth mentioning? Sure! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Lote: SKL/25/8787
Die Süddeutsche Klassenlotterie! SKL-Gunther, Kronacher Str.60 D-96052 Bamberg Alemania http://www.skl.de/ Referencia: SKL/Millionenformel/05/1288 Lote: SKL/25/8787 La presente es para informarle de que su correo electrónico ha ganado un premio de consolación de la SKL dinero alemán premio de la Lotería celebrado hoy. Tu email ha ganado (700,000,00 EUROS). Para empezar sus reclamos, por favor contacto youre SKL Lotería de Alemania Agente de Reclamos. NOMBRE: DR. KLOSE HARRISON E-Mail: drklose_ha...@live.com GANADORES DEL FORMULARIO DE SOLICITUD DE PAGO. NOMBRE COMPLETO FECHA DE NACIMIENTO PAÍS .. SEXO . EDAD .. DIRECCIÓN Ocupación TELÉFONO ... EMAIL . FECHA .. Atentamente, La Sra. Heidi Muller Coordinator de Internet Alemania Lotería Nacional 6/49 Sorteo del Programa Internacional. NOTA: Por favor no responda a este cuadro acaba de ponerse en contacto con su Agente de reclamación a través de esta identificación E-Mail (drklose_ha...@live.com). Saludos personales de los alemanes de la Lotería Nacional ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: Bump :) Does anyone else feel that the part between Libav vs. FFmpeg needed clarification? -- regards, Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#660924: package manager sees version 2.0.0-1 as older than version 1:1.1.13-0.0
Am 24.02.2012 06:59, schrieb James: Attempting to divine the underlying distinction between Debian Multimedia and debian-multimedia, I came-up none the wiser. Nor does the package description seem to offer any deeper insight. In his response to your initial bug report #660814, the one that you took as motive for insulting him, Reinhard sent you a link to our Wiki that explains this very distinction. If you'd have read it, you'd know: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ#There_is_.27Debian_Multimedia_Maintainers.27_and_.27debian-multimedia.org.27._So_what.27s_the_difference.3F So, yeah, using the name debian, instead of Debian in the domain name probably threw me off a bit too. In my (though limited) legal understanding the quoted passage restricts the use of the top-level domain debian, e.g. debian.de or debian.co.uk. Nothing prevents you from randomly inserting the word debian into your TLD, e.g. debian-administration.org or debianforum.de. Hmm - but that still leaves me - naively, perhaps - expecting that the epoch 1: should not do that, or rather, that the package managers - synaptic, aptitude, and apt-get - should not do that. No, the epoch is part of Debian's version number policy. It is perfectly alright for the package managers to consider it - it would be a severe bug if they didn't. Of course, whoever it is who actually created 1:1.1.13-0.0 isn't helping things any - still not providing a version 2 package, some guy with a debian.org email address, who, as you say, is not actually the maintainer of the official debian package - not to be confused with the Debian Multimedia Maintainers who _are_ the official maintainers, but who don't have anything to do with those other guys at debian-multimedia. Yes, randomly adding an epoch to version numbers just to give your own package higher priority than the official one isn't really helpful, I agree. But it's not *us* who did this, so there is nothing that *we* can do about it. It's *you* who decided to install this very package from this repository. Now go read Reinhard's reply to your bug report again. Furthermore, had you used reportbug to file the bug report (as recommended) it would have probably been sent to the corresponding package maintainer, not us. I find the package documentation to be still a bit confusing... Agreed, I think d-m.o should explicitely state on their homepage that they provide an *unofficial repository*. Medibuntu has some nice statements on their homepage to make this clear. Additionally, the package descriptions should also mention that the package are unofficial. Maybe Christian Marillat reads this and eventually considers it... - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Am 24.02.2012 09:56, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Does anyone else feel that the part between Libav vs. FFmpeg needed clarification? Indeed, reads a bit too biased maybe. BTW, I have added a paragraph mentioning xvid and x264. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#661149: mediatomb-common: version 0.12.0~svn2018-6.1 is not upgradable to 0.12.1-2 due libmozjs8d not available
Package: mediatomb-common Version: 0.12.0~svn2018-6.1 Severity: important It is not possible to upgrade the package due to the lack of availability of libmozjs8d on the repository. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages mediatomb-common depends on: ii libavformat52 5:0.7.11-0.1 ii libavutil494:0.5.6-3 ii libc6 2.13-26 ii libcurl3-gnutls7.24.0-1 ii libexif12 0.6.20-2 ii libexpat1 2.0.1-7.2 ii libffmpegthumbnailer4 2.0.7-2 ii libgcc11:4.6.2-15 ii libjs-prototype1.7.0-2 ii libmagic1 5.10-1 ii libmozjs2d 1.9.1.16-12 ii libmysqlclient16 5.1.58-1 ii libsqlite3-0 3.7.10-1 ii libstdc++6 4.6.2-15 ii libtag1c2a 1.7-2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2 mediatomb-common recommends no packages. mediatomb-common suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
vo-amrwbenc 0.1.1-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the vo-amrwbenc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.1.1-1 Current version: 0.1.1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
libass 0.10.0-3 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libass source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.10.0-2 Current version: 0.10.0-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
dvblast 2.1.0-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the dvblast source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.2-2 Current version: 2.1.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lv2dynparam1 2-4 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the lv2dynparam1 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2-3 Current version: 2-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
libaacs 0.3.0-4 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libaacs source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3.0-3 Current version: 0.3.0-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
vo-aacenc 0.1.1-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the vo-aacenc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.1.1-1 Current version: 0.1.1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2012, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am 23.02.2012 23:01, schrieb Benjamin Drung: Are VLC 2.0.0 and Audacity 2.0.0~rc4 (soon 2.0.0) worth mentioning? Sure! Can someone with time do this (or ping me in two weeks)? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#661197: CVE-2012-0270: buffer overflows
Package: csound Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, Two vulnerabilities have been found in csound. Please refer to the following page for more information: http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2012-3/ Regards, Raphael Geissert ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
