Re: mjpegtools_2.0.0+debian-1_source+amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2012-10-08 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Woohoo, thanks for anyone who helped with working on this! I'm really, really excited! Next steps: avidemux and transcode! transcode is already done, now we miss avidemux only! -- Alessio Treglia |

Re: mjpegtools_2.0.0+debian-1_source+amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2012-10-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Awesome, one more step into the right direction! \o/ ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processing of transcode_1.1.7-3_amd64.changes

2012-10-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters
transcode_1.1.7-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: transcode_1.1.7-3.dsc transcode_1.1.7-3.debian.tar.gz transcode_1.1.7-3_amd64.deb transcode-dbg_1.1.7-3_amd64.deb transcode-doc_1.1.7-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

lv2fil package reversion

2012-10-08 Thread Erik Ackermann
Hi Debian Multimedia Maintainers, The lv2fil package was updated during Oneiric to a broken git snapshot. According to your Packages overview, 2.0-1 is still listed as the stable version. Can we revert the Ubuntu version to the stable version? The project is no longer active, and 2.0-1 is the

transcode_1.1.7-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-10-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 10:51:41 +0100 Source: transcode Binary: transcode transcode-dbg transcode-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 3:1.1.7-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia

Bug#681436: marked as done (transcode failed while ripping a DVD)

2012-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:32:33 + with message-id e1tlenl-0001lt...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#681436: fixed in transcode 3:1.1.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #681436, regarding transcode failed while ripping a DVD to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#688618: marked as done (transcode: MPEG2 decoding fails)

2012-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:32:33 + with message-id e1tlenl-0001m1...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#688618: fixed in transcode 3:1.1.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688618, regarding transcode: MPEG2 decoding fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#689659: mpg123 segfaults on specific file

2012-10-08 Thread Miguel A . Colón Vélez
Hello: I just tried the cut.mp3 file on an up to date amd64 Debian Sid system and it worked fine. $ mpg123 cut.mp3 High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layers 1, 2 and 3 version 1.14.4; written and copyright by Michael Hipp and others free software (LGPL/GPL)

Bug#689659: mpg123 segfaults on specific file

2012-10-08 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:07:55 +0200 schrieb Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz: What is the infamous memcpy optimization? I tried brief google, but nothing. This? http://lwn.net/Articles/417881/ It has no details :-(. Yeah, I am talking of the change referred to there. Damn, this is a long time ago

Bug#689659: mpg123 segfaults on specific file

2012-10-08 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Mon, 8 Oct 2012 13:39:26 -0400 schrieb Miguel A. Colón Vélez debian.mic...@gmail.com: What I did notice was that the original user logs suggest that they are using Version 0.59o (1998/Feb/08). of mpg123. My logs show version 1.14.4 and that it worked with 1.14.4. Holy macaroni! I totally

Bug#689659: mpg123 segfaults on specific file

2012-10-08 Thread Miguel A . Colón Vélez
Miguel: What remains is my question about only i486 being built-in currently, is that intentional? Hello: The Debian i386 architecture is supposed to support all i486 and later. The current package of mpg123 gets compiled with --with-cpu=x86_dither since the previous maintainer (from what I

Bug#690001: ardour: No LV2 GUIs

2012-10-08 Thread Benjamin Scherrer
Package: ardour Version: 1:2.8.14-1 Severity: normal Hi, another Ardour user from the official forums and I recognized that in the current Debian testing version of Ardour, somehow the LV2 GUIs do not show up as they did in previous versions. They are displayed using the generic LADSPA

Bug#690006: fluidsynth: FTBFS

2012-10-08 Thread Christoph Egger
Package: src:fluidsynth Version: 1.1.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the