Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 23:26:13 -0400
with message-id <20130623032613.GA16950@x61>
and subject line amsynth + DSSI in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #629192,
regarding amsynth: please provide new DSSI plugin option
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: vlc-nox
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Currently, hppa does not have bluray support as it depends on openjdk-6/7.
As result, vlc build from sources fails:
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by B
Hi -
Thanks for the report. The "testsuite" does not need to be built for
packaging, so actually we disable it in the most recent version in
debian-git and in experimental (which is supercollider 3.6.3). We can
do this for 3.5.3 as well, which will fix this issue.*
However, I'm not sure what the
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:27:46 +0200
with message-id <20130622172746.ga17...@free.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#712935: vlc: cannot take screenshot (neither png nor
jpg)
has caused the Debian Bug report #712935,
regarding vlc: cannot take screenshot (neither png nor jpg)
to be marked
FYI: The status of the flac source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2.1-6
Current version: 1.3.0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
la
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:33:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#713515: fixed in crtmpserver 1.0~dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #713515,
regarding crtmpserver: FTBFS: add_subdirectory given source "tinyxml" which is
not an existing directory.
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#713716: fixed in ffmpeg2theora 0.29-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #713716,
regarding ffmpeg2theora: FTBFS: ld: src/ffmpeg2theora.o: undefined reference to
symbol 'av_reduce@@LIBAVUTIL_51'
to be marked as
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> Source: crtmpserver
> Version: 1.0~dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, y
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:37:44 -0400
Source: ffmpeg2theora
Binary: ffmpeg2theora
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.29-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Tiago Bort
ffmpeg2theora_0.29-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ffmpeg2theora_0.29-2.dsc
ffmpeg2theora_0.29-2.debian.tar.gz
ffmpeg2theora_0.29-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:54:01 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#713716: ffmpeg2theora: FTBFS: ld: src/ffmpeg2theora.o:
undefined reference to symbol 'av_reduce@@LIBAVUTIL_51'
has caused the Debian Bug report #713716,
regarding ffmpeg2theora: FTBFS: ld: src/ffmpeg2theo
Source: ffmpeg2theora
Version: 0.27-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the of
Source: lv2proc
Version: 0.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the offendi
Source: ardour
Version: 1:2.8.14-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -o gtk2_ardour/ardour
Source: csound
Version: 1:5.17.11~dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.5.3~repack-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Ent
Source: gxtuner
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the offending
Source: specimen
Version: 0.5.2rc3-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the off
Source: bitmeter
Version: 1.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly -libm LD fla
Source: mp3fs
Version: 0.31-28-g7b30a54-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering
Source: vdpau-video
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/bash ../libtool --
Source: timemachine
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the off
Source: terminatorx
Version: 3.84-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the offe
Source: tsdecrypt
Version: 9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory
Source: crtmpserver
Version: 1.0~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: qsynth
Version: 0.3.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the offendin
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> Am 18.10.2012 10:23, schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
>
>> The fact that "it may infringe existing patents" is not, per se, against
>> the patent policy. In fact, that statement is true for every package in
>> the archive: *all
Source: jack-rack
Version: 1.4.8~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the o
Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2013, 22:47 +0200 schrieb Ralf Treinen:
> ii libavcodec53 7:0.10.3-dmo1
> ii libavutil51 8:1.0.7-dmo1
Ahem, could you please try again with the official Debian packages?
- Fabian
___
pkg-multimedia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 708137
Bug #708137 [mediathekview] H.264 playback problems: `main decoder error: no
suitable decoder module for fourcc `h264'.` (works with Totem and MPlayer)
Bug #671407 [mediathekview] vlc-nox does not include
/usr/lib/vlc/plugins/code
unmerge 708137 671407
reassign 671407 mediathekview
thanks
On second thoughts...
Le dimanche 19 mai 2013 00:36:54, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
> > Some solutions might be, to try MPlayer before VLC by default or just
> > recommend the package `vlc` and demote `mplayer` and `mplayer2` as
> > suggests
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 708137 671407
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 671407 mediathekview
Bug #671407 [vlc-nox] vlc-nox does not include
/usr/lib/vlc/plugins/codec/libavcodec_plugin.so
Bug #708137 [vlc-nox] H.264 playback problems:
Source: libmpc
Version: 2:0.1~r459-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> t
tags 708953 + confirmed upstream fixed-upstream
forwarded 708953 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/8839
thanks
Hello,
This should be fixed in VLC 2.1. Basically, you need to add the '--started-
from-file' option in the VLC desktop file.
Regards,
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.rem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 708953 + confirmed upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #708953 [vlc] vlc: VLC open in single instance mode doesn't play files
opened from nautilus "Open with VLC"
Added tag(s) upstream, confirmed, and fixed-upstream.
> forwarded 708953 https://trac.
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:18:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688202: fixed in jackd2 1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688202,
regarding jackd2: error output from postinst: jackd2.postinst: line 15: [: =:
unary operator expected
to be marke
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:18:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#709550: fixed in jackd2 1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #709550,
regarding jackd: netone backend crashes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:38:35 +0200
Source: jackd2
Binary: jackd2 libjack-jackd2-0 jackd2-firewire libjack-jackd2-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Mai
jackd2_1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
jackd2_1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1.dsc
jackd2_1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a.orig.tar.gz
jackd2_1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1.debian.tar.gz
jackd2_1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1_amd64.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 709550 jackd2
Bug #709550 [jackd] jackd: netone backend crashes
Bug reassigned from package 'jackd' to 'jackd2'.
No longer marked as found in versions jackd-defaults/5.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #709550 to the same v
40 matches
Mail list logo