On 28 July 2014 15:05, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> On 28.07.2014 13:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more
than
Package: streamtuner2
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi maintainer,
Just tried to install and use streamtuner2, but I only see a progress bar
on top-left corner on screen that doesn't go past the subject's stage.
I've waited several minutes but it stays
Package: vlc
Version: 2.1.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
in modules/codec/avcodec/audio.c one finds:
AVFrame frame;
memset( &frame, 0, sizeof( frame ) );
According to the documentation of libavutil this is wrong:
"sizeof(AVFrame) is not a part of the public ABI, so
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:35:38 -0300
with message-id <53d689ea.8080...@br.ibm.com>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #755540,
regarding libav: FTBFS on ppc64el architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:05:46PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 28.07.2014 13:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
> >>On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >>>In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more
> >
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package libav
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #754435 (http://bugs.debian.org/754435)
# Bug title: libavcodec55.so crashes vlc while d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 444368 RFP: dvd95 -- DVD9 to DVD5 converter
Bug #444368 [wnpp] ITP: dvd95 -- DVD9 to DVD5 converter
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: dvd95 -- DVD9 to DVD5 converter' from 'ITP: dvd95 --
DVD9 to DVD5 converter'
> noowner 444368
Bug #444368 [wnpp
Am 28.07.2014, 15:32 Uhr, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System
:
I accidentally exposed my complete contact details. If it were possible to
delete them I'd appreciate it. If that's technically to big a hassle I
have to live with it.
Thanks
___
pk
On 28.07.2014 13:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more
than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in
debian/testin
retitle 444368 RFP: dvd95 -- DVD9 to DVD5 converter
noowner 444368
tag 444368 - pending
thanks
Hi,
A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging dvd95. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other p
El 28/07/2014 08:53, "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh"
escribió:
> However:
>
> The change in Debian-specific symbol versioning and sonames being done to
> ffmpeg so that it is co-installable with libav *is* a problem.
>
> It has to be done in coordination with the Canonical guys, so that both
> Debia
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:11:49 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Please report this issue upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #755528,
regarding "Can't play mp4 audios with libav"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
On 28.07.2014 13:24, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
wrote:
Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an
immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.
at least in theory.
Plus I would definitely appreciate
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 603293 RFP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst
Bug #603293 [wnpp] ITP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst' from 'ITP:
festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst'
> noowner 603293
B
On 28.07.2014 12:20, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
* Do you intend to replace Libav by FFmpeg in Debian?
No, there is no need to replace anything as long as it is maintained.
Currently the main goal is to give multimedia maintainers a choice
between the two sets
retitle 603293 RFP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst
noowner 603293
tag 603293 - pending
thanks
Hi,
A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging festige. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause o
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:47:26 +0100
Source: qastools
Binary: qastools-common qasconfig qashctl qasmixer
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.18.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia M
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more
> > than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in
> > debian/testing. In consequence this means that any package
qastools_0.18.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
qastools-common_0.18.0-1_all.deb
qasconfig_0.18.0-1_amd64.deb
qashctl_0.18.0-1_amd64.deb
qasmixer_0.18.0-1_amd64.deb
qastools_0.18.0-1.dsc
qastools_0.18.0.orig.tar.bz2
qastools_0.18.0-1.debian.tar
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
wrote:
>> Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an
>> immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.
>
> at least in theory.
Plus I would definitely appreciate to see some bug stats supporting
such a t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
personally i would welcome if both libav and ffmpeg could co-exist
within Debian¹.
as i see it, libav and ffmpeg have diverged, and as such i would like
to have the choice which one to use.
On 2014-07-28 11:55, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 28, Ales
Hi Julien,
On 28.07.2014 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
It remains to be seen, what the release team prefers: frustrated users and
developers or both forks in jessie.
The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo
fight it out among themselves and pick a winner.
I am n
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> * Do you intend to replace Libav by FFmpeg in Debian?
>No, there is no need to replace anything as long as it is maintained.
>Currently the main goal is to give multimedia maintainers a choice
>between the two sets of libraries to link against, and our users
On Jul 28, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at
> this stage. It's too late for Jessie.
Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an
immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.
Personally I feel that we have inf
Ciao,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo
> fight it out among themselves and pick a winner. We're not going to
> ship both and hand that mess over to the security team.
Personally I don't feel like dro
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:39:29 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
> On 28.07.2014 02:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > wrote:
> >
> >> * Does it make sense for me to switch my package?
> >>The rule of thumb is, if your upstr
26 matches
Mail list logo
