Bug#773329: Incorrect Cflags line in jack.pc

2015-04-20 Thread Ted Felix
On 04/19/2015 09:10 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote: The cflags from pkg-config for jack are incorrect which breaks makefiles and configure scripts that depend on them (e.g. those for rosegarden). I tend to disagree - more likely, rosegarden is broken, because a ton of other software that relies on

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2015-04-20 16:07 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com: Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 15:49 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have a HiDPI display (2560x1600 on 13 screen), and small icons are a pain. OSX (the only OS that has properly working HiDPI

Bug#783037: marked as done (xbmc: please package kodi and update the package)

2015-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2015 01:40:11 +0200 with message-id 55358e5b.3060...@googlemail.com and subject line Re: Bug#783037: xbmc: please package kodi and update the package has caused the Debian Bug report #783037, regarding xbmc: please package kodi and update the package to be marked as

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2015-04-20 15:49 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de: On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Great! How do you do repacking? Manually? Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason it

Bug#783037: xbmc: please package kodi and update the package

2015-04-20 Thread shirish
Package: xbmc Version: 2:13.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The upstream have renamed it to 'kodi'. See http://kodi.tv/introducing-kodi-14/ and development is at https://github.com/xbmc/ . It does tell the way how to do the packaging as well at

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2015-04-19 14:13 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de: Just wanted to let you know that I'm mostly done with packaging ardour4.0 (released yesterday). Hi Adrian, I gave a little test to Ardour4 ... looks really great. Just one issue I can't create session connected via ALSA

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: $ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4 $ git checkout -b upstream-a4 At least my version of git doesn't require the first line. Now I am building new ardour ... just noticed this in build output * Use External Libraries:

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2015-04-20 14:36 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de: On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: $ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4 $ git checkout -b upstream-a4 At least my version of git doesn't require the first line. Now I am building new ardour ... just noticed this in

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2015-04-19 22:28 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de: On 04/19/15 19:31, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: I'm currently building in pbuilder and will report back later. Amazing! I am excited to give it a try. ;) Pushed to ardour3.git now, just checkout the master-a4 and upstream-a4

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread forum : : für : : umläute
On 2015-04-20 12:13, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: 2015-04-20 10:30 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com: Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to

Processed: tagging 773993

2015-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # fixed in b183468 tags 773993 + fixed-upstream Bug #773993 [libavcodec56] avprobe loops endlessly on certain FLAC files Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 773993:

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 11:30:50) On 04/19/15 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: Last not least, we should probably cut down on the number of ardour versions in Debian. Nobody supports a2 anymore, same for a3. It's a Would it make sense to exclude a2 from Jessie? Removal request? I

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to the

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 11:23 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: I've done that already, so it must be something else: You will have to be on the master-a4 branch already for this to take effect, which Jaromir probably wasn't. - Fabian ___

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2015-04-20 10:30 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com: Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to the right

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2015-04-20 12:31 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de: On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to the right branches. - Fabian ___

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 04/20/15 10:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to the right branches. Right. The proper thing to do is for the person choosing to use non-default

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 20 April 2015 at 10:49, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote: On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Great! How do you do repacking? Manually? Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 15:49 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: These should indeed be dropped. If you can figure out some magic to do this automatically, that would be great. There's automatic git-upstream-repackaging in CDBS, I've used it for jackd2, so taking a look at jackd2's debian/rules

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: $ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4 $ git checkout -b upstream-a4 $ git fetch origin upstream-a4:upstream-a4 master-a4:master-a4 should do about the same. - Fabian

Hello dear God Bless you, my name is Mrs.Roseanna I want to donate some fund which I inherited from my late husband to establish a charity foundation in your country under your care for the poor and l

2015-04-20 Thread Roseanna Martins
___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Great! How do you do repacking? Manually? Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason it doesn't. P: ardour3 source: source-contains-autogenerated-visual-c++-file

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41) On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 32x32 Should we ship smaller icon? No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have a HiDPI display (2560x1600 on 13 screen), and small icons are a

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 20 April 2015 at 11:57, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41) On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 32x32 Should we ship smaller icon? No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2015-04-20 17:06:25) On 20 April 2015 at 11:57, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41) On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 32x32 Should we ship smaller

Processed: tagging 781812

2015-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 781812 + fixed-upstream Bug #781812 [libav] Set AV_DISPOSITION_ATTACHED_PIC for MKV Cover Art Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 781812: