On 07/01/17 02:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi,
A proper fix for this needs to be something accepted by upstream, I guess.
Kodi's build system allows setting the default device through a
./configure option
thus I think this does not have to be upstreamed.
Do you mean upstreaming a more comp
Hi,
2017-01-06 21:27 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas :
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:27:05 +0100 Thomas Renard wrote:
>
>>
>> kodi is hard coded to the wrong "device" path to lirc.
>> The binary tries /dev/lircd but the "device" (which is a socket!)
>> can be found at /var/run/lirc/lircd.
>
> Hi!
>
> lirc maint
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:39:14 +0100
Source: kodi
Binary: kodi kodi-data kodi-bin kodi-eventclients-common kodi-eventclients-dev
kodi-eventclients-wiiremote kodi-eventclients-ps3 kodi-eventclients-kodi-send
kodi-addons-dev
kodi_17.0~rc2+dfsg1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kodi_17.0~rc2+dfsg1-1.dsc
kodi_17.0~rc2+dfsg1.orig-libdvdnav-5-0-3.tar.bz2
kodi_17.0~rc2+dfsg1.orig-libdvdread-5-0-3.tar.bz2
kodi_17.0~rc2+dfsg1.orig-webinterface-default.tar.xz
kodi_17.0~rc2+dfs
Hi Jaromir,
Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2017-01-06 22:06:49)
> 2017-01-06 14:10 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
> > I need your help: Please install liblrdf 0.5.0 from experimental, and
> > test that the following packages continue to work:
> >
> > * ardour
> > * composite
> > * guitarix
> > * ros
Hi. dgit 2.x <= 2.13 had a bug which causes it to generate corrupted
git commits. These commits are tolerated by Debian's infrastructure
but cause errors from git-fsck and cannot be pushed to some popular
git hosting sites.
You're receivingg this mail because:
* You receive @packages.debian.org
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:50:51 +0100
Source: pd-nusmuk
Binary: pd-nusmuk
Architecture: source
Version: 20151113+repack-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: IOhannes
pd-nusmuk_20151113+repack-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-nusmuk_20151113+repack-3.dsc
pd-nusmuk_20151113+repack-3.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
2017-01-06 14:10 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
Hi Jonas,
> I need your help: Please install liblrdf 0.5.0 from experimental, and
> test that the following packages continue to work:
>
> * ardour
> * composite
> * guitarix
> * rosegarden
> * sonic-visualiser
> * terminatorx
I tested ar
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:27:05 +0100 Thomas Renard wrote:
>
> kodi is hard coded to the wrong "device" path to lirc.
> The binary tries /dev/lircd but the "device" (which is a socket!)
> can be found at /var/run/lirc/lircd.
Hi!
lirc maintainer speaking... note that the /var/run/lirc/lircd path j
Package: kodi
Version: 2:17.0~beta6+dfsg1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
kodi is hard coded to the wrong "device" path to lirc.
The binary tries /dev/lircd but the "device" (which is a socket!)
can be found at /var/run/lirc/lircd.
- write ~/.kodi/userdata/Lircmap.xml according to working i
Hello.
My name is lambert kouadio, i am a banker and I would like you to stand in as
an appointed beneficiary to my deceased client who left a deposit of about $
8.7 Million with a bank here in Ivory Coast before his demise. The account is
without any registered next of kin and the funds
Source: audacity
Version: 2.1.2-2
Tags: patch upstream
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
audacity fails to cross build from source, because it uses AC_CHECK_FILE
to examine the build system. AC_CHECK_FILE should only be used for
examining the host system and thus fails during cross bu
Le 2017-01-06 11:46, anta...@hippie.lt a écrit :
This bug should be fixed now. New release is available on github:
https://github.com/antanasbruzas/abGate/releases/
Hi Antanas,
and thanks for having been back on the code.
Thanks as well to Jaromir for the debian packaging.
I've been testing it
FYI: The status of the sonic-visualiser source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.5~repack1-3
Current version: 2.5~repack1-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the vamp-plugin-sdk source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6~repack0-2
Current version: 2.6~repack0-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the vco-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.3.0-4
Current version: 0.3.0-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
FYI: The status of the swh-lv2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2
Current version: 1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing hap
FYI: The status of the tap-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.7.3-1
Current version: 0.7.3-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
FYI: The status of the ste-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.0.2-4
Current version: 0.0.2-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
On 2017-01-06 17:11:09, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Package: handbrake
> Version: 0.10.5+ds1-2+b2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi team,
>
> there is a new upstream release 1.0.1 of handbrake available. I have
> already had a look at packaging it and this is as far as I got:
>
> - Add --disable-df-fetc
Package: handbrake
Version: 0.10.5+ds1-2+b2
Severity: wishlist
Hi team,
there is a new upstream release 1.0.1 of handbrake available. I have
already had a look at packaging it and this is as far as I got:
- Add --disable-df-fetch and --disable-df-verify to configure flags.
- Remove patches 001 a
Package: libdvd-pkg
Version: 1.4.0-1-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
it is nearly always required to at least once set a region code on a
new DVD drive. Thus, please add the "regionset" package as a
Recommends, either of the libdvd-pkg package itself or of the
resulting libdvdcss library package.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:19:40 +0100
Source: jalv
Binary: jalv
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.6.0~dfsg0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Jaromír Mikeš
D
jalv_1.6.0~dfsg0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jalv_1.6.0~dfsg0-1.dsc
jalv_1.6.0~dfsg0.orig.tar.xz
jalv_1.6.0~dfsg0-1.debian.tar.xz
jalv-dbgsym_1.6.0~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb
jalv_1.6.0~dfsg0-1_amd64.buildinfo
jalv_1.6.0~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:33:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824353: fixed in abgate 1.1.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824353,
regarding abGate - strange GUI
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:59:52 +0100
Source: abgate
Binary: abgate
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Jaromír Mikeš
Des
Any news on that? I'd love to see new version in Debian.
regards
Bartek
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
abgate_1.1.8-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
abgate_1.1.8-1.dsc
abgate_1.1.8.orig.tar.gz
abgate_1.1.8-1.debian.tar.xz
abgate-dbgsym_1.1.8-1_amd64.deb
abgate_1.1.8-1_amd64.buildinfo
abgate_1.1.8-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue d
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:49:38 +0100
Source: liblrdf
Binary: liblrdf0-dev liblrdf0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 824353 pending
Bug #824353 [abgate] abGate - strange GUI
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
824353: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824353
Debian Bug Trackin
Hi all,
I have just now released new upstream version 0.5.0 of liblrdf, but only
to experimental for now - for two reasons:
* Links against libssl
* _ldrf_md5_* symbols are gone
The libssl linking affects licensing, but I might be able to avoid
it (by using a later git snapshot which addre
liblrdf_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
liblrdf_0.5.0-1.dsc
liblrdf_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz
liblrdf_0.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
liblrdf0-dbgsym_0.5.0-1_amd64.deb
liblrdf0-dev_0.5.0-1_amd64.deb
liblrdf0_0.5.0-1_amd64.deb
liblrdf_0.5.0-1_amd64.buildinf
2017-01-06 13:32 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
> Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2017-01-06 12:25:21)
>> 2017-01-06 11:46 GMT+01:00 :
>>> On 2016-12-28 14:55, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
The Debian multimedia team is currently thinking of removing abGate
from the repositories for the next Debian
Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2017-01-06 12:25:21)
> 2017-01-06 11:46 GMT+01:00 :
>> On 2016-12-28 14:55, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
>>> The Debian multimedia team is currently thinking of removing abGate
>>> from the repositories for the next Debian "stretch" since it's buggy
>>> (see https://bugs.d
On 6 January 2017 at 08:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2017-01-06 11:46 GMT+01:00 :
>> On 2016-12-28 14:55, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>>> The Debian multimedia team is currently thinking of removing abGate
>>> from the repositories for the next Debian "stretch" since it's buggy
>>> (see h
2017-01-06 11:46 GMT+01:00 :
> On 2016-12-28 14:55, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
Hi
>> The Debian multimedia team is currently thinking of removing abGate
>> from the repositories for the next Debian "stretch" since it's buggy
>> (see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824353 ). I
On 2016-12-28 14:55, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
Hi Antanas,
The Debian multimedia team is currently thinking of removing abGate
from the repositories for the next Debian "stretch" since it's buggy
(see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824353 ). I
just wanted to let aware of th
38 matches
Mail list logo
