libdvdcss-installer can be found at
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libdvdcss-installer.git
>
> Any comments/concerns?
Are we allowed to distribute the source code of libdvdcss? Then we could
put the source code into a binary package and build it on installation.
I w
ke vlc or xine are in my repository because Debian
> > added a conflicts against libavutil51 from my repository.
I checked debian/control of the vlc source package and found no such
conflict.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signat
tags 625536 - patch
thanks
Hi Jamie,
the upstream developers rejected your patch as stated in [1]. Your patch
doesn't apply any more in Audacity 2.0.0. Can you address upstream's
comments and supply an updated patch?
[1] http://bugzilla.audacityteam.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192
--
Benj
ia-maintainers/2012-April/025861.html
[2] The changelog entry only says "Hop, hop hop."
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/660924
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-
; "do we support packages
> from dmo (no)" and "is dmo a part of Debian (no)". Improvements are
> welcome.
Wouldn't it be better to always write the full name instead of using
'dmo'? It's clear to us, what dmo stands for, but that's not clear to
everyon
ckages that are available in Debian is a
no-go for us. He either needs to revert the epoch-bump changes or rename
the binary packages if he decides to go way (1).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
forwarded 662628 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641
tags 662628 confirmed
thanks
Thanks for tracking it down. I forwarded it to upstream.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
on that.
Can you rebuild all revert dependencies and check if one of it uses one
of the removed function? According to upstream there should be none.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Samstag, den 21.04.2012, 11:15 +0200 schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Can you rebuild all revert dependencies and check if one of it uses one
> > of the removed function? According to upstream there should be none.
>
&g
s a media
> player), the VLC Streaming HOWTO (a guide to using VLC as a streaming
> solution), the VLS user guide and the VideoLAN FAQ.
>
> I think you meant VLC user guide or even VLC User Guide.
No, VLS user guide is correct. VLS stands for VideoLAN Server.
--
Benjamin
videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commit;h=e89f4296febf218a5669a8ceb09ee79d9def0f25
Yes, this bug is fixed in the upstream branch. I will wait for the 2.0.4
bug-fix release to fix this RC bug.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
/?p=pkg-multimedia/vlc.git;a=commitdiff;h=29b6fb5108949fc9d16f6108204447c4e4149054
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-
de (1)
vlc-cache-gen was run in postinst prior to 2.0.0-1. I dunno, why it is
still called.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing li
Hi,
Am 29.09.2012 04:08, schrieb David Prévot:
> OK, thanks, I was looking in the wrong place (well in the vlc package,
> not the vlc-nox one ;). The proposed patch indeed fixes the issue (it
> took me some time to setup a test environment to dist-upgrade from
> squeeze to wheezy including my pack
uot;Depends: fonts-freefont-ttf".
I wrote a longer response to the bug report [1].
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1062039/comments/4
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to be with licensing, not with obscure patent
issues.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@list
in understanding the issue as
> well and see what else I can dig out.
>
> Looking forward to guidance.
Is your problem reproducible? Which sound API do you use (pulseaudio,
alsa)? What audio hardware do you have? Can you try VLC 2.0.4 or
upstreams master branch? Can you run vlc wi
end to test 2.0.4. If 2.0.4
is still affected, I suggest to test their latest commit from their
stable git branch [1]. If this version is still affected, I recommend to
report a bug upstream.
[1] You could grab the Debian source package from
https://launchpad.net/~videolan/+archive/stable-daily and
-===
> ii vlc-nox 2.0.4-1 amd64
> multimedia player and streamer (without X support)
>
> Any more or other ideas are welcome.
Can you run dpkg -l "*vlc*" to see if all vlc binary packages ar
ut
module: Pulseaudio audio output)?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
tput plugin (Tools ->
> > Preferences -> Audio -> Output module: Pulseaudio audio output).
>
> But doesn't this indicate a bug in the ALSA output plugin then?
The problem is that pulseaudio and VLC both try to access the hardware,
but not every audio hardware support that.
n Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Format: 1.8
> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:59:03 +0200
> > Source: vlc
> > Binary: libvlc-dev libvlc5 libvlccore-dev libvlccore5 vlc vlc-d
rt libav 9 are not
trivial. I offer my help to forward any patches to upstream and get them
integrated there.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
e autotool files and update
config.{sub,guess}. The man page says that dh-autoreconf and
autotools_dev shouldn't be used in conjunction. The problem is that
"autoreconf -f -i" does not update the config.{sub,guess} files and I
haven't found out why. H
eebsd-{amd64,i386} and powerpc seem to have a different reason to
fail to build.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
vlc decodes opus files?
FYI, vlc uses libopus directly.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
o pass that condition, and
> definitely not phonon-backend-vlc nor browser-plugin-vlc.
I concur with upstream. These packages should be fixed to use the stable
API from libvlc instead of using libvlccore. Looking at the other
package, they all just depend on libvlc, but not on libvlccore.
On Mi, 2013-10-30 at 16:44 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2013-10-30 15:48, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > On Mi, 2013-10-30 at 13:08 +0100, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:29 +, "Adam D. Barratt"
&
On Do, 2013-10-24 at 09:25 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 01:40 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Drung:
> > We use dh-autoreconf to regenerate the autotool files and update
> > config.{sub,guess}. The man page says that dh-autoreconf and
> > autotools_
Package: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
vamp-hostsdk.cp and vamp-sdk.pc contain:
libdir=${prefix}%LIBDIR%
This leads to a wrong include directory: /usr\%LIBDIR\%
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multim
fix this issue? I'm
> currently very low on disk space so am Ubuntu chroot is out of the
> question for me.
>
> The fix is simple (just insert a "%s" as second argument in
> csoundMessage or CsoundDie). However, since I can't reproduce the
> failure, more i
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> thank you for reporting.
>
>
> Would be some thing like this solution?
>
>
> libdir=${prefix}/$(LIBDIR)
>
>
> mira
>
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/5 Benjamin Drung
> Package: vamp-plugin-sdk
> Vers
you want some help to solve this ?
While preparing 2.1.1, I looked at the bug and fixed it (after several
iterations trying to get rid of the empty directories, too).
Thanks for your offer to help. We have enough other open bug reports
that could need help, especially bug #725057.
--
Benjami
Package: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The libtool archive files /usr/lib/libvamp-hostsdk.la and
/usr/lib/libvamp-sdk.la are
invalid and break building packages with libtool. Please remove these files
from the
package in stable. They are already removed in
know.
I am +1 for having these packages in our team.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 06:52 +1100, Jackson Doak wrote:
> I'm already on the list.
> I'd like to help with gmusicbrowser and vlc especially, but i'll work
> on anything that i can.
Hi and welcome. Speaking of VLC, it may need security updates in the
stable release.
-
to_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
> make: *** [build-arch] Error 2
> ...
>
> Attaching a patch that fixes this by considering the new location of a header
> file.
I detected this issue a while ago and filed an upstream bug:
https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/10019
I probab
c3c662a3f733d1b7a49b8cf5c5f595aed41
Would it be sufficient to wait for the next upstream release to ship
this fix?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.deb
tached.
Thanks for reporting this issue. The solution is to split the
documentation (html and examples) from the -dev package and put it into
a -doc package.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-mul
Hi,
there are too many SPAM mails on this pkg-multimedia-maintainers list.
Please manually filter the mails from non-subscribers (excluding
white-listing known good addresses).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multim
patches into the
> videolan branch.
http://dvdnav.mplayerhq.hu/ states that their code was imported to the
videolan git repositories. So the videolan developer didn't fork the
library, but took over the development. So we can just ship the coming
releases from videolan (which will be 5.0.0).
Can we
r this sane patch. Please go ahead and upload 2.1.4-1~pbo70
+1 with your patch. Do you want to become a co-maintainer of vlc?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.a
lds on arm64? You can grab a package from [1] and try to build it on
arm64.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~audacity-team/+archive/daily
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Package: libsoundtouch-dev
Version: 1.7.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
The macros PACKAGE, PACKAGE_*, and VERSION are defined by soundtouch_config.h
when including in your source code (in this case
Audacity). These macros should not exposed to users of the soundtouch librar
was available at compile-time.
>
> The attached patch fixes this problem.
Thanks for the patch. This is clearly an upstream issue. Can you forward
your patch to upstream to get it integrated into VLC?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2014, 23:17 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
> Control: tag -1 upstream
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> On 29.07.2014 21:58, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 28.07.2014, 22:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
> >> The attached patch fixes this p
hanges can be reverted of
> course if they are to controversial. The other changes should make it
> possible to handle the plugin split a bit better for the time being. I
> think it's better to revisit this after the jessie release and get vlc
> ready for the libav transition for now.
>
> Let me know what you think.
For the record: +1 for moving vlc-plugin-pulse into vlc and splitting
Samba into vlc-plugin-samba.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
dded in 2.1.0-1 without a changelog
> entry.)
It was requested in bug #642187.
I think we should get libdvd-pkg [1] into the archive and recommend this
package instead.
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/libdvd-pkg.git
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
_
://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg01010.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00668.html
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
g more "C-standard" is the only way to go, like you propose.
The C99 standard allows printing size_t with "%zu", but Microsoft Visual
Studio needs "%Iu" instead [1].
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/tcxf1dw6.aspx
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & U
s which make dh-autoreconf work. I like to
either package an svn snapshot or wait for the release and then apply
the wx3.0 patch.
Sadly the wx3.0 patch needs adjustment to apply to svn head. Can you
update the patch to apply cleanly to svn head? Upstream will be happy
for this contribution after
ream want to get wx3.0
support in for 2.0.7 and is actively working on getting it in the svn
repository. So you could provide the missing bits and we will get
upstream to test your proposed changes (when I commit them to the
upstream repository).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
ted
> Enhanced3DNow! detected
> SSE2 detected
> Enhanced3DNow! detected
> SSE2 detected
> audacity: pcm_plug.c :388 : snd_pcm_plug_change_channels: L'assertion «
> snd_pcm_format_linear(slv->format) » a échoué.
> Abandon
I tested audacity on sid and squeeze today. It sta
ayer). The package names
can be improved. Here are my suggestions:
* mplayer should ship the previous mplayer-nogui package.
* gmplayer should ship the gmplayer binary (previous mplayer package)
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
tches are dropped.
I have create a audacity-team team on launchpad. You are welcome to join
it. You will then get notifications if a daily build fails.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signi
t; Uploader: A Developer (optional)
>
> Action: dm
> Fingerprint: A7830CCABA4AFF02E50213FE8F32B4422F52107F
> Allow: jackd-defaults jack-audio-connection-kit jackd2 ardour calf
> libffado midisport-firmware kmidimon libdrumstick a2jmidid qjackctl
>
>
>
> Could any of the DDs step up and take the appropr
shared library by taking care of a
proper SONAME version?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/662774
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
cusageenvironment0 package was a
mistake. I fixed it in the git commit [1] and it will be part of the
next upload. Thanks for spotting it.
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/liblivemedia.git;a=commitdiff;h=9bb777017b874315c532cd61f6090c673a4fc877
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian
bug into a RFP or ITP bug.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
attached patch if it really works around the bug.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e5b32e2..fd38507 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+vlc (2.0.3-5) testing; urgency=low
+
+ * vlc-plugin-*: Br
-with-tuning=8548" which
> is propagated to gcc as "-mtune=8548" on powerpcspe.
Your patch logic looks complicated (multiple filters). What are the
values of
DEB_HOST_ARCH
DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU
on powerpc and powerpcspe?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
Am Freitag, den 01.03.2013, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/01/2013 03:43 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2013, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge:
> >> As you can see above, -mtune=G4 is used by default, leading to the above
> &
w.videolan.org/security/sa1301.html
>
> I can submit bug if needed. At least I can't find that file, which was
> changed.
I would appreciate a bug report with an attached and tested patch.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
at the commitdiff-link was in the CVE-request in
> oss-security mailing list. I also prefer not to report the bug with unclear
> details.
Is there test case / file that triggers this bug?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
__
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 23:03 +0200 schrieb Henri Salo:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:54:30PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Is there test case / file that triggers this bug?
>
> I don't have any. You can request such from upstream if you want or I can do
> it.
Am Sonntag, den 07.04.2013, 20:45 -0400 schrieb Michael O'Donnell:
> Package: vlc
> Version: 2.0.5-2
>
> [...]
>
> VLC media player 2.0.3 Twoflower (revision 2.0.2-93-g77aa89e)
Are you really using vlc 2.0.5-2?
--
Benjamin Drung
De
lc5 2.0.3-5 i386 multimedia player and streamer library
> ii libvlccore5 2.0.3-5 i386 base library for VLC and its modules
> [...]
> ii vlc-data 2.0.3-5 all Common data for VLC
You haven't updated libvlc* and vlc-data. Tha
installed the "vlc" package that ships the libavcodec plugin?
PS: Yes, the libavcodec plugin should be in vlc-nox (see bug #671407).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg
Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 12:04 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 16:34 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 15:20 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Drung:
> > > Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > > &g
bump the version of a
dependency for every bug in the dependency, unless the bug renders the
package useless for every user.
[1] https://errors.ubuntu.com/?package=vlc
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Hi,
I violated the 2nd maintainer rule for libsoxr. libsoxr is a new build
dependency of Audacity. Who wants to be my co-maintainer?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintai
Am Donnerstag, den 06.06.2013, 00:20 +0100 schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> On 5 June 2013 22:55, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I violated the 2nd maintainer rule for libsoxr. libsoxr is a new build
> > dependency of Audacity. Who wants to be my co-maintainer?
&g
on ppc64, disable ASM optimizations elsewhere.
Does FLAC have NEON support that could be enabled on ARM?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.
- optional libdevel
> > libmp3lame0_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb - optional libs
> >
> > Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
> > Closing bugs: 90091
> >
>
> Whoohoo, finally! Kudos to everyone involved.
\o/ Audacity with LAME enabled is on the way.
--
ing error found by Lintian.
Author: Benjamin Drung
Forwarded: No
--- a/common/faad/id3v2tag.c
+++ b/common/faad/id3v2tag.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@
23, "Pranks",
108,"Primus",
92, "Progressive Rock",
-67, "Psychadelic",
+67,
Description()'
/usr/include/xulrunner-8.0/npapi.h:792:13: error: ambiguates old
declaration 'const char* NPP_GetMIMEDescription()'
make[3]: *** [libvlcplugin_la-vlcshell.lo] Error 1
I have currently not enough time to investigate it further.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Dev
Package: liblivemedia
Version: 2011.09.02-1
Severity: wishlist
A new upstream release 2011.12.02 is available. Please package the new version,
because VLC 1.2 trunks need the newer version and I want to keep daily builds
of VLC running.
___
pkg-multim
want to join the Debian Multimedia team and become an
co-maintainer of audacious? The audacious package lacks an maintainer
with enough time.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
le branch
> of libupnp.
>
> Please note that libupnp6 will introduce IPv6 support to libupnp by
> default but I think vlc is already OK with that. Many thanks,
The Build-Dependency is change in the git repository. An upload is
currently blocked by the iceweasel transition.
--
What di you think of the packages I mentioned above?
>
> Did I miss one importand DVD ripper?
Maybe not important, but you missed dvdbackup. It's in the Debian
archive, but not under the hood of pkg-multimedia (yet).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian &
Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 10:47 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > vlc (2.0.0~unix-0ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
> >
> > * New upstream release (Closes: #499381, #573064, #624027, LP: #4558
t; http://code.google.com/p/audacity/downloads/list
Yes, it comes from Google Code. It was announces on the upstream mailing
list, that the RC version are available for testing.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is
Am Montag, den 20.02.2012, 13:28 +0100 schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> Bump :)
Are VLC 2.0.0 and Audacity 2.0.0~rc4 (soon 2.0.0) worth mentioning?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2012, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> Am 23.02.2012 23:01, schrieb Benjamin Drung:
> > Are VLC 2.0.0 and Audacity 2.0.0~rc4 (soon 2.0.0) worth mentioning?
>
> Sure!
Can someone with time do this (or ping me in two weeks)?
--
Benjamin Drung
*** [libskins2_plugin_la-theme_loader.lo] Error 1
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vlc&suite=wheezy
>
> A fix through wheezy-proposed-updates would be appreciated. Cc-ing -bsd@
> for advice, and -release@ for information. (Thinking of it a bit more,
>
1.1.13 and it was build the same way (with -maltivec).
> Is that ok? I mean, do we no longer support non-altivec PowerPC
> machines, or is it somehow ensured that only an Altivec plugin is
> affected, not all code?
Only a few plugins are build with Altivec.
--
Benjamin Drung
ing is the
> debian/changelog entry).
>
>
> I hope that when the VLC 2.0.1 comes out you will pass that flag to
> build the OSSv4 support (not everyone likes PulseAudio and ALSA).
> Thank you in
> advance of the hopefull update and for all the work you are doing.
I have enabl
ut I wasn't carefully
enough.
> - your basically reverting the patch through an extra link flag.
>
> I realize I'm probably sounding angry. But that's the current state of
> affairs.)
I fixed the package and doing a testbuild. Once it succeeds, I will do
a
eems to work fine.
We have two symlinks in /usr/share/vlc/skins2/fonts/ pointing to the
fonts of the ttf-freefont package. Removing this package could break
this skin.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This
ou could edit the Makefile.tail files
and add support to build a shared library.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multi
rt. We probably want upstream to take care of
using a proper SONAME. So we should get upstream accept the change.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-main
Hi,
I remember the discussion about who should be Alioth Team Admin. IMHO
having everyone as admin is an overkill. It is enough to have a bunch of
active members who accept (or decline) join request. I don't need or
want to be Admin.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
sign
ope we didn't decide everyone
> was forced to be an admin. What we did decide is that anyone who wants
> to be an admin, can be one (that is, we trust every team member to be
> an admin by default).
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 20:04, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
&
Yes, because I removed my Admin role just now.
Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2012, 20:30 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> Well, you are listed as a senior developer in the admin page...
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 20:23, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > I did this some time ago. Either I fai
LC this way.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/
olicy for our team. My favorite would be dh7
and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the switch to
dpkg-source 3.0 right now. Instead we should switch once the uploader
thinks that the tools are ready for 3.0.
Other opinions?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debia
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 19:00 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >Let's discuss a packaging policy for our team. My favorite would be dh7
> >and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the swit
Hi,
Who will join the Mini DebConf in Berlin?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing
to new contributors.
>
> What I questioned was a wording by Benjamin Drung that could only (to
> me) be interpreted as "in this team we are phasing out CDBS - new
> packages must use dh7 while older ones need not be converted right now".
> I still question that.
The interpr
!
>
> I do not like long indentations, though. I propose that we recommend
> wrapping with comma+newline+one-single-space.
I prefer the long indentations to have all items below the first one.
This make the affiliation more visible, because of the different width
of the indentation.
-
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
