Bug#824211: marked as pending

On 31 May 2016 at 16:27, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Will be fixed soon. > > mira > > 2016-05-31 20:42 GMT+02:00 Javier Serrano Polo : >> El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure: >>> + * Fix multi-arch path. >> >> Will the plug-ins be

Bug#824211: marked as pending

Oh, I now see what happened with swh-plugins now with '+ * Fix multi-arch path."' (I received email to deb-multimedia mailing list and replied without checking bug context). Sorry about that! I'll move my OT discussion to the mailing list. Best regards, Nicholas

Whatever happened to this multiarch effort?

Following up on: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824211#70 The LV2 multi-arch enabling thread stopped at the following: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-January/036354.html Did anyone ever follow-up with Robin Gareus or Alessio Treglia?

RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

Hi, I'm a member of the team, and I'd like to maintain backports of these packages for Jessie. In particular I'm looking forward to 3.7.2 which updates the last.fm submission API to one that actually works ;-) I thought it was more appropriate to post here first, but please let me know if you

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/audacious-plugins/audacious-plugins_3.6.2-2~bpo8+1.dsc On 7 April 2016 at 20:26, Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a mem

Re: joining the team

Thank you for the help and advice! Nicholas ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

joining the team

Dear Debian Multimedia team, In the last year I've spent time practising formal backports and updating packages, and since sometime this last fall I've been doing uploads to debian-mentors. Currently I think the only packages in the Debian archive with my name on them are the exfat-fuse and and

team member RFS upload of audacious-3.7.2-2~bpo8+1

Hi, I am a member of the team, but not a full DD, and I'd like to maintain a backport of audacious to jessie. No one has submitted a bug for obsolete and broken Last.FM (and possibly Libre.FM) submission in version 3.5-2 or 3.6.2-2, but I have confirmed that audacious has updated the submission

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 29 April 2016 at 18:02, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:07:20PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> I made my changes, git add, git commit, git tag. I wasn't sure which >> convention to use for backports, so I based my tag on the deb

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

Hi Mattia, On 28 April 2016 at 06:19, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:26:28PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> I'm a member of the team, and I'd like to maintain backports of these >> packages for Jessie. > > ok. > >>

bluray burning

Hi team! First off, I hope I'm not breaking an unspoken taboo by raising this issue... Given that cdrkit still cannot reliably burn BDRs, and a precedent for allowing CDDL software in the archive, with minor acrobatics, I believe it is possible package a cdrecord-building package similar to

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

Sorry for the delay. Life... ;-) On 10 May 2016 at 20:16, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:03:18PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> > Now, umh, with `push debian/%(bpo_tag)s would be what I usually do >> > without a bran

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 10 May 2016 at 11:42, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:17:30PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> So, I'm going to use a local bpo of sndio instead (also because yours >> would not be nice to upload due to the +2. why 2 identical changelog >> entries??), and

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 10 May 2016 at 11:17, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > Sorry for the delay, these days are crazy for me That's life, right?! :-) > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:05:17PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> I've just purged that repo and uploaded a bpo of l

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 6 May 2016 at 05:51, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:32:20PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> /usr/include/roaraudio.h is found in libroar-dev. Libroar-dev is not >> a build dependency of either a audacious or audacious-plugins;

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

P.S. and I now see that I backported it for personal use, because an mpv backport (also for personal use only) required it. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 29 April 2016 at 22:42, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 07:55:29PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> But you said you preferred it to be pushed with just a tag! > > yes, but not in master! > A tag is always wanted in any c

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 4 May 2016 at 23:32, Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the delay. Oh my, it seems I wasn't subscribed to > debian-backports@! I am now :-) Correction: I believe been subscribed for quite some time but haven't received any mail since April 28th. I've

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

Hi Mateusz, On 2 May 2016 at 03:34, Mateusz Łukasik <mat...@linuxmint.pl> wrote: > On 02.05.2016 02:06 +0200, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> >> This is question I've been trying to answer: How do you detach from >> HEAD? I read a possibly obsolete article that said

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

Hi Mattia, On 3 May 2016 at 09:56, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 08:50:55AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> I'll go ahead and built later. > > So, I've now actually tried to build them. > src:audacious built just fine, but audacious-plugins failed: > >

Re: Request for jessie backport of mpv

Hi Chris, On 18 April 2016 at 17:10, Chris Metzner wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for taking time to read this, I know you are very busy with other > matters. The version of mpv on jessie is 0.6.2-2 and this is ancient. Many > new features are out in a newer versions

Re: modifying libva (master) .gitignore

On 8 July 2016 at 04:33, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-07-06 16:17:09, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> On 5 July 2016 at 05:30, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: >> > >> > On 2016-07

Re: [SCM] intel-vaapi-driver packaging branch, jessie-backports, created. debian/1.7.1-1-1-gb40f4e3

- > commit b40f4e34eed7e6e9f3225aa28f8ac9963d509747 > Author: Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri Jul 29 06:25:56 2016 -0400 > > Backport 1.7.1-1 to Jessie. > I figured out a way to a hack to work around the gbp build failure that is fixed in 1.7.1-2 UNRELEASED. Briefly

Re: [SCM] libva/master: Fix FTBS by updating ignore-debian.upstream.patch * Remove debian.upstream, and associated unused stanzas from Makefile.am and Makefile.in

On 17 July 2016 at 18:02, Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 July 2016 at 04:52, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 2016-07-17 01:46:30, sten-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >>> >>> + DEB_BUILDDIR = debian.build &

Re: [SCM] libva/master: Fix FTBS by updating ignore-debian.upstream.patch * Remove debian.upstream, and associated unused stanzas from Makefile.am and Makefile.in

On 17 July 2016 at 04:52, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-07-17 01:46:30, sten-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >> commit aa0330cf48fb0f6fd37840d46981efe0b0a3e2c0 >> Author

Bug#827983: libva1: upgrade to va 1.7.1 breaks intel graphics

Hi, For another data point, I've attached the output to the following: lsb_release -a > graphics-stack.txt && echo >> graphics-stack.txt && dpkg -l linux-image-4.4.14.20160627 *drm* xserver-xorg-video-intel *mesa* libva* i965-va-driver | sed '//d' >> graphics-stack.txt As Sebastian notes, I also

Re: modifying libva (master) .gitignore

Hi Sebastian, On 5 July 2016 at 05:30, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 2016-07-04 14:54:17, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> I ran into an issue with backporting libva. Is it ok if I add the >> following to libva (master) .gitignore?: >>

Re: modifying libva (master) .gitignore

Hi Sebastian, On 8 July 2016 at 04:33, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-07-06 16:17:09, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> >> On 5 July 2016 at 05:30, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: >> > >> > On 2016-07-04 14

modifying libva (master) .gitignore

Hi, I ran into an issue with backporting libva. Is it ok if I add the following to libva (master) .gitignore?: debian.upstream/changelog debian.upstream/control Thanks, Nicholas ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: modifying libva (master) .gitignore

P.S. I think I've finally gotten the hang of pushing tags disconnected from a branch. eg: 1. create local bpo development branch 2. prepare backport 3. tag bpo 4. git push origin tag_name And the reason I made those mistakes with the audacious bpo is because I understood "not on a branch" to

Re: concerning llibva backport

On 5 August 2016 at 09:43, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-07-29 06:40:07, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> On 29 July 2016 at 06:28, <sten-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org> wrote: >> > The branch, jes

Re: concerning llibva backport

On 5 August 2016 at 18:30, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > On 5 August 2016 at 18:15, James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 05/08/16 22:47, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On 5 August 2016 at 17:24, James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> wrote

Bug#831537: marked as pending

On 25 July 2016 at 21:41, Roland Hieber wrote: > Hi, > > I'm curious and want to understand, so am I right that a binNMU [0] > should be enough here? If not, why not? > > [0]: https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU > > Cheers, > - Roland I thought so too... You can follow the

Re: [SCM] intel-vaapi-driver/master: Update changelog.

On 26 July 2016 at 15:28, <sten-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org> wrote: > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > commit 83b3cee40dba3b40797b576a4d32429741224c15 > Author: Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue Jul 26 15:26:05 2016 -0400

Re: concerning libva-1.7.2-1 backport

On 6 August 2016 at 05:12, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-08-05 16:03:39, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> I did a fresh build of libva-1.7.1-1~bpo+1 today, and noticed that it >> was building against mesa-

Re: concerning libva-1.7.2-1 backport

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:58:41PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/09/16 16:39, Nicholas Steeves wrote: > > On 5 September 2016 at 11:03, James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> wrote: > >> On 05/09/16 15:41, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >>> Hi Seb

Bug#836078: audacious: please switch from dbus-x11 to default-dbus-session-bus | dbus-session-bus

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:21:11PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > As described in > I'm trying to reduce how much dbus-launch is used in Debian. > This package currently Depends on dbus-x11 as a way to get a session bus. > > This

[RFS] updated libva and intel-vaapi-driver bpos

Hi! I've updated the jessie-backports branches of libva and intel-vaapi-driver, and have lightly tested the resulting packages. Fast-forwarding seems a bit smoother, but that might be placebo effect ;-) Please upload and tag these updated bpos. Kind regards, Nicholas signature.asc

Re: [RFS] updated libva and intel-vaapi-driver bpos

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:08:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:03:23PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Does "Needs-Build" status mean > > that the package is still waiting for CPU time on an armel, armhf, and > > mipsel system

Re: [RFS] updated libva and intel-vaapi-driver bpos

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:43:07PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:41:25AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Given that I gather intel-vaapi-driver needs the newer libva and today > > I'm too lazy to copy .deb in the local repository I'll wait for libva to > > reach the

Re: Joining pkg-multimedia team

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 04:58:28PM +0200, Andreas Boll wrote: > Hi, > > my name is Andreas Boll, I'm a Debian Maintainer and I'd like to officially > become part of the Debian Multimedia Team. > I'm also a member of the Debian X Strike Force where I co-maintain Mesa and > related packages. > >

Re: concerning llibva backport

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:26:58PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > On 23/08/16 23:30, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > On 7 August 2016 at 09:12, James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 06/08/16 22:58, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:

Re: Transitioning mplayer2 users to mpv

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:56:21PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently on IRC, uau suggested that instead of transitioning mplayer2 > users to mplayer, they should be transitioned to mpv instead. The > reasons for this include: mpv being a fork of mplayer2 (thus retaining >

Re: mipsel buildd

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:51:33AM +, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 22/11/16 00:17, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:22:37AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > >> On 15/09/16 01:15, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >>> Thank you

Re: [RFS] updated libva and intel-vaapi-driver bpos

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:07:18PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:36:13PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > > > The libva version I've requested migrates to testing tomorrow, > > > > assuming no bugs are reported in the next however many of

Re: mipsel buildd

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:22:37AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/09/16 01:15, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:08:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:03:23PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >>

Re: [RFS] updated libva and intel-vaapi-driver bpos

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:08:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:03:23PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Does "Needs-Build" status mean > > that the package is still waiting for CPU time on an armel, armhf, and > > mipsel system

Re: [RFS] updated libva and intel-vaapi-driver bpos

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 03:23:27AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 07:31:10PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Proof that they build is here: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/libva > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/intel-vaapi-dri

Bug#857552: i965-va-driver: failing to play videos (stops half-way through)

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:50:54AM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi > > On 2017-03-13 07:13:09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Sebastian Ramacher > > wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > > > On 2017-03-12 13:31:24,

Re: [SCM] audacious/master: Merge tag 'upstream/3.8.2'

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 03:33:47PM +, mati75-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > New upstream version 3.8.2 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > X-Git-Refname: refs/heads/master > X-Git-Reftype: branch > X-Git-Oldrev: 260cd9136b228abe35071ecc9fc0406f5d277cea >

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Hi Ian, Francesco, John, and everyone else reading this, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:28:43AM -0500, John Lindgren wrote: > On 12/10/2017 06:12 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > In particular I'm concerned about lines like this from > > d/copyright: > > > > "p

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Dear Debian Legal Team, I've CCed you for my reply to this bug, because I don't have the experience to be able to tell if Debian implicitly relicensed Audacious as GPL-3 from 2012-2016, how potentially falling out of BSD-2-clause license compliance might have affected this, and also how this

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Hi John, On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:08:56PM -0500, John Lindgren wrote: > > Per Debian policy 2.3: > > "Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright > information and distribution license in the file > /usr/share/doc/package/copyright > (see Copyright information for

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Hi Francesco, John, and everybody else reading this, On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:10:40AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:39:41 -0500 Nicholas D Steeves wrote: [...] > Failing to retain the license text in the package distribution is in > fact lack of compliance w

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:36:49AM -0500, John Lindgren wrote: > Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > > Both BSD 3-clause and BSD 2-clause allow relicensing as GPL, thus so > > long as the licensing terms are complied with correctly BSD code can > > perpetually and unidirectiona

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:23:47AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 18:12:39 -0500 Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > [...] > > GPL-incompatible 2-clause BSD > [...] > > A nitpick: the 2-clause BSD license is not GPL-incompatible (it's > indeed compatibl