Comments regarding lv2_1.0.0~dfsg2-1_amd64.changes
Hi maintainer(s)! Just a minor remakr: All the files in the waflib directory contain a pointer to http://waf.googlecode.com/git/docs/wafbook/single.html#_obtaining_the_waf_file. However, that URL just gives a 404. Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rtaudio_4.0.10~ds0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As requested by alessio === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Comments regarding mp4v2_1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1_amd64.changes
Hi maintainer(s)! Please add the license and copyright holder of libplatform/prog/option.cpp to your debian/copyright. Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Hi! Am 19.04.2011 08:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: while I *highly appreciate* your timely acceptance of the vo-aacenc package (AAC is an MPEG specification after all), I still fail to see why very similar packages like lame are left unattended in the NEW queue for 9 months now! Do you consider that a good way to start a productive discussion, or you just want to dump some heat? If it's the second, I recommend to stop reading here, and send all your replies to /dev/null. Thanks in advance! And just for the record: lame hasn't been left unattended in the NEW queue. Just because something waits there, doesn't mean we ignore it and don't do anything with it. Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Comments regarding tetraproc_0.8.2-1_amd64.changes
Hi! Regarding your package description... May I assume that TetraProc converts the A-format signals from a tetrahedral Ambisonic microphone into B-format signals ready for recording. [..] makes sense to those, who are familiar with the topic? I have no idea, what it does (but am most likely also not in the user group targeted by this software). Best regards, Alexander, FTP Assistant ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Comments regarding tetraproc_0.8.2-1_amd64.changes
Hi again! Sorry for the second mail, but I just noticed a sourceless pdf file in your orig tarball: blockdiagram.pdf. As I'm not entirely sure, if the pdf is it's source (I'm note sure, but consider it possible), I would like to ask you to clarify it with upstream, but see no reasen to reject it based simply on my doubts. So accepted. Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
gwc_0.21.13~repack2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As requested by maintainer === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: gwc_0.21.13~repack2-1_amd64.changes is NEW
Am 14.04.2011 01:10, schrieb Alessio Treglia: (new) gwc-dbg_0.21.13~repack2-1_amd64.deb extra debug there is a licensing issue with this package, please drop it. Done. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Comments regarding laditools_1.0~rc2+20100724.gitf4d4a2-1_amd64.changes
Hi maintainer(s)! I'm going to accept your package, but our ftp-trainee found a missing copyright holder in your copyright file. Please add him with your next upload: Please add Krzysztof Foltman w...@foltman.com as a copyright holder (for ladiconf). Best regards, Alexander, FTP Assistant ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rtirq_20090920-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As requested by maintainer === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Comments regarding ghostess_20100905-1_amd64.changes
Hi maintainer! I'm going to accept your package, but please rewrite your package description. The only thing I understood from it, is that it does soemthing with music (and even that is atually more a guess). Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#580120: mediatomb: diff for NMU version 0.12.0~svn2018-6.1
Hi! * Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org [100716 18:04]: I've prepared an NMU for mediatomb (versioned as 0.12.0~svn2018-6.1) [..] Could you publish the diff as well? Sorry, it's attached. Usually, I use nmudiff for that which attachs the patch (with mutt). According to your mail's headers, you are also using mutt. I don't get why it doesn't attach the patch then :/ I use it as well, but as the (fast) computer I use to compile my uploads isn't allowed to sent mails, I use the output nmudiff created to copy it over to my notebook. In this case I seem to have forgotten to copy over the patch :( Sorry. I think a nicer solution would be to ask the user via debconf if the UI should be created, but didn't want to introduce this change via an NMU. Best Regards, Alexander diff -Nru mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/changelog mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/changelog --- mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/changelog 2010-02-11 00:52:26.0 +0100 +++ mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/changelog 2010-07-16 15:52:57.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +mediatomb (0.12.0~svn2018-6.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Disable user interface (Closes: #580120) + + -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:52:21 +0200 + mediatomb (0.12.0~svn2018-6) unstable; urgency=low * Allow mediatomb to build against ffmpegthumbnailer 2.0 library. diff -Nru mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/config.xml.dist mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/config.xml.dist --- mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/config.xml.dist 2010-02-08 04:56:29.0 +0100 +++ mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/config.xml.dist 2010-07-16 15:52:17.0 +0200 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ information on creating and using config.xml configration files. -- server -ui enabled=yes show-tooltips=yes +ui enabled=no show-tooltips=yes accounts enabled=no session-timeout=30 account user=mediatomb password=mediatomb/ /accounts @@ -154,4 +154,4 @@ /profile /profiles /transcoding -/config \ Kein Zeilenumbruch am Dateiende. +/config signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#588554: jamin: diff for NMU version 0.97.14~cvs~81203-3.1
Hi Jonas! Am 15.07.2010 15:34, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: On the contrary: your change is nice - please do upload without delay. Thanks, moved it to the 0-day queue. You are however much encouraged to apply the change directly to our git (debcheckout should work) - it is maintained in collab-maint so you should have write access already. Uhm... Sorry, I tried and failed. I haven't used git for packaging (or anything else), yet. A debcheckout worked, and could apply and commit my changes locally, however when I now try to git push my changes, I get the following: a...@nb-xp13822:/tmp/jamin$ git push fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly See you soon in New York, I hope, Sorry, this year I won't make it. To much work to do :( Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#588554: jamin: diff for NMU version 0.97.14~cvs~81203-3.1
Hi! Am 16.07.2010 14:41, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: You probably just need to use either -a or -u option to debcheckout. Ah, of course, I only did an anonymous checkout. Easiest is probably to start over with a fresh debcheckout. Tried that, now I get an other error: a...@nb-xp13822:/tmp/jamin$ git push Counting objects: 8, done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 706 bytes, done. Total 5 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0) error: insufficient permission for adding an object to repository database ./objects fatal: failed to write object error: unpack failed: unpack-objects abnormal exit To git+ssh://toli...@git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/jamin.git ! [remote rejected] master - master (n/a (unpacker error)) error: failed to push some refs to 'git+ssh://toli...@git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/jamin.git' Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#588554: jamin: diff for NMU version 0.97.14~cvs~81203-3.1
Am 16.07.2010 15:30, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: We'll push your NMU changes after they emerge as source package in the archive. Thanks for the help, and (again) sorry for wasting your time trying to be even more helpful. No problem. At least I learnt a little bit about git ;) Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#580120: mediatomb: diff for NMU version 0.12.0~svn2018-6.1
tags 580120 + patch tags 580120 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for mediatomb (versioned as 0.12.0~svn2018-6.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#588554: jamin: diff for NMU version 0.97.14~cvs~81203-3.1
tags 588554 + patch
tags 588554 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for jamin (versioned as 0.97.14~cvs~81203-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/changelog jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/changelog
--- jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/changelog 2010-04-02 21:21:33.0 +0200
+++ jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/changelog 2010-07-15 15:01:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+jamin (0.97.14~cvs~81203-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/patches/1004_install_correct_dir.patch: Install files into
+/usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64 (Closes: #588554)
+
+ -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:00:24 +0200
+
jamin (0.97.14~cvs~81203-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Revert to depend (not just recommend) swh-plugins.
diff -Nru jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/1004_install_correct_dir.patch jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/1004_install_correct_dir.patch
--- jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/1004_install_correct_dir.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/1004_install_correct_dir.patch 2010-07-15 15:00:03.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+--- a/configure.in
b/configure.in
+@@ -97,13 +97,6 @@ AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(GETTEXT_PACKAGE, $GE
+ AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT
+
+ libnn=lib
+-case ${host_os} in
+- linux*)
+- case ${host_cpu} in
+-x86_64|mips64|ppc64|sparc64|s390x)
+-libnn=lib64
+- esac
+-esac
+
+ if test ${libdir} = '${exec_prefix}/lib'; then
+ libdir='${exec_prefix}/'${libnn}
diff -Nru jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/series jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/series
--- jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/series 2010-03-12 19:32:12.0 +0100
+++ jamin-0.97.14~cvs~81203/debian/patches/series 2010-07-15 14:59:38.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
#1001_use_AM_CFLAGS_for_CFLAGS.patch
#1002_compile_with_-fPIC.patch
1003_add_dynamic_linking.patch
+1004_install_correct_dir.patch
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Comments regarding libebml_1.0.0-1_i386.changes
Hi Maintainer! I'm going to accept your package, but could you please clarify the license of your deian/* files in a succeding upload? I guess you intended to license is under the terms of the GPL (as you refer to the GPL at the bottom of it). Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rtmpdump_2.2e-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hi maintainer! librtmp/* seems to be licensed under the terms of the LGPL 2.1+. Please add that to your copyright file. Best regards, Alexander === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
