Bug#604491: Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries

2011-02-15 Thread Gürkan Sengün
hello

thanks for the info, i've mailed upstream about this, but haven't gotten any 
reply
yet.

yours,
gurkan



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#604491: Fwd: Re: Bug#604491: Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries

2011-02-15 Thread Gürkan Sengün


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: Bug#604491: Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 
libraries
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:27:07 +0100
From: Predrag Viceic predrag.vic...@epfl.ch
Organization: EPFL
To: Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch

Hi Gurkan.

As for now, I don't have enough time to port Freecycle to QT4. I have started 
that
port and maybe
some day I'll finish it, but not now.

I'm sorry.

Regards,
Predrag

Le mardi 15 février 2011 13.19:32, vous avez écrit :
 hello
 
 thanks for the info, i've mailed upstream about this, but haven't gotten
 any reply yet.
 
 yours,
 gurkan




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Remaining packages with debian-multime...@l.d.o as maintainer:

2010-11-09 Thread Gürkan Sengün

Hello Felipe


With my current sid system, there are the following packages with
debian-multime...@l.d.o as the Maintainer:

fusd-kor
gigedit
gmerlin
ll-scope
openmovieeditor
rev-plugins
sineshaper
stops
vco-plugins
vkeybd

Of those, gigedit is the only one with a valid git repository in our
team area (vkeybd has an empty one). It even has an upload to
experimental.

Reading back old discussions, it seems that:

Jonas has an interest in vkeybd, but probably forgot about it (that
would explain the empty repository).
Jonas also cares about openmovieeditor.
Alessio should probably care about stops, because aeolus depends on it (ping?).

Uploaders of the other packages, do you still care about these
packages? They have seen little or no activity lately. You are welcome
to join us at the new team [1].

So, I propose we file O: bugs about all the other packages (I
volunteer to do that), and people who care about the packages import
them into the git area if not done already. I will wait 2 weeks before
starting orphaning them, in case someone wants to take them.

Also, the following packages have debian-multime...@l.d.o in the
Uploaders field:

freecycle
goattracker
milkytracker
ocp


If debian-multimedia is not interested in those. I will definitely keep
maintaing them, since I also use those. So I'll just remove debian-multimedia
from the Uploaders with the next upload...

Yours,
Gurkan



Gürkan, you are maintainer in all of them. If you want, you can join
us and maintain them within our team. Otherwise, please remove the
reference to the debian-multime...@lists.debian.org in those packages.


[1] wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia





___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Remaining packages with debian-multime...@l.d.o as maintainer:

2010-11-09 Thread Gürkan Sengün

On 11/09/10 11:13, Andreas Tille wrote:

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:08:43AM +0100, G??rkan Seng??n wrote:

If debian-multimedia is not interested in those. I will definitely keep
maintaing them, since I also use those. So I'll just remove debian-multimedia
from the Uploaders with the next upload...


I think this is a misunderstanding: Debian Multimedia as a team is
definitely interested (as well in the package as in team maintenance).
However, the list address should be

   Debian Multimedia Packages 
Maintainerspkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org


So I'll with the next upload, put this into the Maintainers field, and myself
to uploaders, did I get it right, now?

Yours,
Gurkan


as the packaging oriented list where bug reports etc should go and the
currently used list should rather be used for user oriented discussion.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

PS: We most probably need a policy document which clarifies issues like
 this.  Examples are the policies of Debian Med and Debian Science.
 Not everything applies here - but might give a reasonable draft.  If
 I'm not completely wrong the documents I mentioned were originally
 drafted from the doc the Debian Perl team is using.




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers