Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-12-28 Thread rosea grammostola
The links to the AMS patches of Atte are fixed on his website, he told me.
It seems possible to download them now:

http://atte.dk/stuff

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:

 Quoting rosea grammostola (2014-11-14 21:13:45)
  Ok, I asked Atte via email and you can use the latest GPL license.

 Thanks again for your help with this, Rosea - and thanks to Atte for
 clarifying.

 Sorry to be nitpicking so much, but can you please forward that email
 from Atte, including headers, for use as public record?  Even better
 would be if instead Atte could state himself the licensing of his
 contribution by including such statement together with the code itself.

 ...and speaking of the code - it looks odd how the patch is committed to
 Github as a tarball.  That seems unsuitable for kenrestivo to adopt - I
 suggest (unless you know better and have coordinated with kenrestivo
 already) to instead commit as regular source code the way it is intended
 to merge together with the rest of that code project, an then make a
 pull request.


  - Jonas

 --
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: Fwd: AMS patches license

2014-11-15 Thread rosea grammostola
-- Forwarded message --
From: Atte Jensen atte.jen...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: AMS patches license
To: rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com


Fine with me!

Vh Atte
Den 14/11/2014 21.10 skrev rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com
:

Ok, thanks. Is the latest GPL license ok for you ?







 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Atte Jensen atte.jen...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Yeah, i almost send you a reply after directing you there. Thing is i
 just separate my Web server and my file server, so the files are not there
 for the php that's generation the zip on the fly. However I tested it and
 got a download, so I thought it might work anyhow due to sone caching i
 implemented. Unfortunately i didn't try to unzip the file.

 I appologize, and will let you know when it's back online, ok?

 Vh Atte
 Den 14/11/2014 20.58 skrev rosea grammostola 
 rosea.grammost...@gmail.com:

 I can imagine...

 Hey, I can't unpack your zip files:


 Archive:  ams.zip
   End-of-central-directory signature not found.  Either this file is not
   a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive.  In the
   latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
   the last disk(s) of this archive.
 unzip:  cannot find zipfile directory in one of ams.zip or
 ams.zip.zip, and cannot find ams.zip.ZIP, period.
 Failed to detect file type of ams.zip.
 WARNING: There were errors while processing files!


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
Patches can be found here:
https://github.com/johnsen/Linux-synth-patches/tree/master/ams-patches

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:02 PM, rosea.grammostola 
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:

 Package: ams
 Version: 1:2.1.1-1kxstudio1
 Severity: normal

 Dear Maintainer,

 Could you please add extra instumentpatches to the AMS package? The
 patches are made by Atte Andre Jensen (atteATyoumail.dk ) and are
 interesting for other users.


 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: jessie/sid
   APT prefers trusty-updates
   APT policy: (500, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 'trusty-security'), (500,
 'trusty'), (100, 'trusty-backports')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
 Foreign Architectures: i386

 Kernel: Linux 3.17.1-031701-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

 Versions of packages ams depends on:
 ii  cmt   1:1.16-1kxstudio1
 ii  libasound21.0.27.2-3ubuntu7
 ii  libc6 2.19-0ubuntu6.3
 ii  libgcc1   1:4.9.1-0ubuntu1
 ii  libjack-jackd2-0  1:1.9.10-1~trusty1
 ii  libqt4-opengl 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2ubuntu4
 ii  libqtcore44:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2ubuntu4
 ii  libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2ubuntu4
 ii  libstdc++64.8.2-19ubuntu1
 ii  mcp-plugins   1:0.4.0-2kxstudio1
 ii  swh-plugins   0.4.15+1-7kxstudio1

 Versions of packages ams recommends:
 ii  amb-plugins  1:0.8.1-4kxstudio1
 ii  rev-plugins  1:0.7.1-1kxstudio2
 ii  vco-plugins  1:0.3.0-2kxstudio1

 ams suggests no packages.

 -- no debconf information

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
Those from Atte are GPL

Copyright Atte Jensen

Here are the latest AMS paches from Atte

http://atte.dk/stuff

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:

 tags 769541 moreinfo
 thanks

 Please clarify copyright and licensing.

 Cheers.

 sent via mobile

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
Don't you make this more complicated as needed? Everything is clear at the
moment, the copyright holder and the license.
I emailed the author, but it is also on the website:

quote: Here are some music related stuff I did, all publiched under the
GPL-license.
http://atte.dk/stuff

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:

 The GPL license has specific requirements (e.g. verbatim copy of the
 license shipped with the sources).

 We need a tarball with sources *and* a copy of the license as released by
 upstream.

 sent via mobile

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
Also the patches from Ken Restivo are GPL

quote Ken Restivo:Yep, they are derived from the AMS example patches and
Atte's, so therefore they're all GPL.



On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, rosea grammostola 
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:

 Don't you make this more complicated as needed? Everything is clear at the
 moment, the copyright holder and the license.
 I emailed the author, but it is also on the website:

 quote: Here are some music related stuff I did, all publiched under the
 GPL-license.
 http://atte.dk/stuff

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org
 wrote:

 The GPL license has specific requirements (e.g. verbatim copy of the
 license shipped with the sources).

 We need a tarball with sources *and* a copy of the license as released by
 upstream.

 sent via mobile



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
I rest my case

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:

 Quoting rosea grammostola (2014-11-14 17:22:25)
  Also the patches from Ken Restivo are GPL
 
  quote Ken Restivo:Yep, they are derived from the AMS example patches
  and Atte's, so therefore they're all GPL.

 I hope that abbreviation GPL refers to GNU Public License.

 I hope it is version 2 of said license, and that it is the ...or newer
 variant of the license.

 But that is all wishfull thinking on my part - and I am not the
 copyright holder so can only hope or be sloppy and risk problems later,
 which Debian try hard to avoid!

 For GPL licensing, please pretty please use the exact phrases
 recommended by the GNU project, which is written at the bottom of the
 licensing text itself:

  one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.
  Copyright (C) year  name of author
 
  This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
  the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
  (at your option) any later version.
 
  This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
  GNU General Public License for more details.
 
  You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
  along with this program.  If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.

 Hope that makes sense.

  - Jonas

 --
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
What do you guys want? If you don't want to add it, perfect, but just say
it. Don't start a nitpicking game about some instrumentsetting patches! I
just want to make Debian a bit better, and share some 'user info' which
could help others to make music with Debian.

I was pretty clear about the fact that those users have no problem (read
they like to share their patches with others) for you to add it to the
package AMS. I asked them which license via email, they say GPL. So make it
the GPL version you want, and don't make a problem about nothing.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:54 PM, rosea grammostola 
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:

 I rest my case

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:

 Quoting rosea grammostola (2014-11-14 17:22:25)
  Also the patches from Ken Restivo are GPL
 
  quote Ken Restivo:Yep, they are derived from the AMS example patches
  and Atte's, so therefore they're all GPL.

 I hope that abbreviation GPL refers to GNU Public License.

 I hope it is version 2 of said license, and that it is the ...or newer
 variant of the license.

 But that is all wishfull thinking on my part - and I am not the
 copyright holder so can only hope or be sloppy and risk problems later,
 which Debian try hard to avoid!

 For GPL licensing, please pretty please use the exact phrases
 recommended by the GNU project, which is written at the bottom of the
 licensing text itself:

  one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.
  Copyright (C) year  name of author
 
  This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
  the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
  (at your option) any later version.
 
  This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
  GNU General Public License for more details.
 
  You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
  along with this program.  If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.

 Hope that makes sense.

  - Jonas

 --
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
It's just so irritating that things can move so slowly in Debian sometimes.
I really like 'Debian' for being so focussing on good packaging with proper
license etc., but sometimes it just don't have a point, like in this case.

It's about some presets for AMS, a synth. I mean it's no base software or
something, just presets. It's clear that the makers of those presets wants
to share them with a GPL license.

I like to help Debian, but if it's so cumbersome to report a simple
request, then I'll think twice the next time to summit a bugreport. Then
asking the maintainers of Kxstudio or AVLinux would be a better shot I
guess. I should care less.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:

 Hi Rosea,

 Quoting rosea grammostola (2014-11-14 20:04:02)
  What do you guys want?

 We want to redistribute great code that fits our definition of Free
 Software.

 We _do_ expect this code to be great (just haven't tried it out yet).

 We _do_ expect this code to fit our licensing criteria (just need its
 author(s) to unambiguously state that).

 Sorry, it is not our intention to harrass anyone here, if that's the
 impression you react strongly to :-(


  - Jonas

 --
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package

2014-11-14 Thread rosea grammostola
Ok, I asked Atte via email and you can use the latest GPL license.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM, rosea grammostola 
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:

 It's just so irritating that things can move so slowly in Debian
 sometimes. I really like 'Debian' for being so focussing on good packaging
 with proper license etc., but sometimes it just don't have a point, like in
 this case.

 It's about some presets for AMS, a synth. I mean it's no base software or
 something, just presets. It's clear that the makers of those presets wants
 to share them with a GPL license.

 I like to help Debian, but if it's so cumbersome to report a simple
 request, then I'll think twice the next time to summit a bugreport. Then
 asking the maintainers of Kxstudio or AVLinux would be a better shot I
 guess. I should care less.

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:

 Hi Rosea,

 Quoting rosea grammostola (2014-11-14 20:04:02)
  What do you guys want?

 We want to redistribute great code that fits our definition of Free
 Software.

 We _do_ expect this code to be great (just haven't tried it out yet).

 We _do_ expect this code to fit our licensing criteria (just need its
 author(s) to unambiguously state that).

 Sorry, it is not our intention to harrass anyone here, if that's the
 impression you react strongly to :-(


  - Jonas

 --
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Fwd: [LAU] plugin updates

2014-03-10 Thread rosea grammostola
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org
Date: Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 2:04 PM
Subject: [LAU] plugin updates
To: Linux Audio Users linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org, Linux Audio
Developers linux-audio-...@lists.linuxaudio.org


Some updates to

http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html

REV-plugins-0.7.1

* Removed G2reverb from the .so, see below.

g2reverb-0.7.1

* Contains the G2reverb plugin from earlier REV-plugins.
* Plugin file name is now the same as in the original
  (2003) version, so AMS patches using this should load
  without error.

WAH-plugins-0.1.0

* Some cleanup, unique ID of the auto-wah changed to 1949
  to avoid conflict with recent stereo panner plugins.

Ciao,

--
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

___
Linux-audio-user mailing list
linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Fwd: The Situation(s) With JACK

2011-12-09 Thread rosea grammostola
Maybe not a bad thing to follow the discussion on Jack-devel to improve 
the JACK situation.


http://lists.jackaudio.org/private.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org/2011-December/008537.html 



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Fwd: [Open Octave Development] New Anouncement List

2011-10-08 Thread rosea grammostola



 Original Message 
Subject:[Open Octave Development] New Anouncement List
Date:   Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:26:36 -0600
From:   Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
Reply-To:   developm...@openoctave.org
To: developm...@openoctave.org, m...@openoctave.org



*Note to distro packaging specialists*. We've created an announce 
mailing list for news and developments for OOM, including announcements 
for tarball releases. You may miss the thrills and overwhelming 
excitement of our regular mailing lists, but the announce ML will keep 
you informed, so you can package from the latest builds. We hope you 
take advantage of this, and keep all of our shared users up to date with 
the latest features and developments from the OpenOctave team. Thanks!


To subscribe to the announce mailing list, send an email to:

*announce-subscr...@openoctave.org 
mailto:announce-subscr...@openoctave.org*


and then send mail to:

*annou...@openoctave.org mailto:annou...@openoctave.org*


--
Christopher Cherrett
ccherr...@openoctave.org
http://www.openoctave.org

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

openoctave 2011.1 is out

2011-10-03 Thread rosea grammostola

Hi,

It would be good to have this in Debian, it looks really nice.

http://www.openoctave.org/


Thanks in advance,
\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Fwd: Ambisonics / Kokkini Zita

2011-08-01 Thread rosea grammostola

Hi,

Linuxaudio has some strong and special points. One of them is 
Ambisonics. Would be nice if people can use Debian to work and/or 
experiment with Ambisonics. The good point: most of the packages needed 
for Ambisonics are in Debian already! Great job!


Two are missing afaik:
- Drc http://drc-fir.sourceforge.net/
- TetraCal (Tetraproc is in Debian, not sure about TetraCal)

By the way; most packages of Fons Adriaensen are often useful and 
powerful: quality software. Most packages of him are in Debian, but 
today he recommended an package on the LAU mailinglist which is not in 
Debian yet: jnoisemeter 
http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/index.html


See also message below about Ambisonics.

Best regards,

\r

 Original Message 
Subject:Re: [LAU] which packages are needed for ambisonics
Date:   Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:06:41 +0200
From:   Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de
To: linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org



On 07/31/2011 01:05 PM, rosea grammostola wrote:

 Hi,

 Which packages are needed for ambisonics? In other words, which packages
 should be in a distro, to provide people the right tools for working
 with ambisonics?

 I did a little research and found:
 ambdec


absolutely essential.


 amb-plugins
 ardour


essential for production, but not for listening.


 japa


not related to ambisonics. but dead useful.


 jconvolver


not essential either. but very much recommended, as it contains
configurations to encode ambi into uhj stereo and back. for ambi use,
you want to include fons' separate reverbs package, which contains
some very nice b-format IR reverbs.


 drc


unrelated. it only does room and speaker correction.
it's probably my fault it got included in the list, since i once
described how to set up a diy ambi rig that includes drc. but that's
optional.


 aliki


not strictly related, although helpful if you want to create your own IR
reverbs for jconvolver (or any other convolver), or if you want to
measure your room and/or speakers to perform DRC.


 zita-rev1


very helpful.


 probably: non-mixer


or any other lightweight alternative to ardour, if it's just about
signal routing.

if the question is what do i include in my distro, then by all means
add all the software you mentioned. if the question is what is the
minimum software stack i need to play around with ambisonics, then keep
it simple. in any case, you may want to include mplayer, as it's one of
the few players that does multichannel correctly (at least up to 8
channels) and will let you enjoy those soundfield recordings out on the
web without having to import them into an ardour session.

___
Linux-audio-user mailing list
linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: timestretching

2011-07-31 Thread rosea grammostola

On 07/30/2011 03:59 PM, Arnout Engelen wrote:

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 03:49:11PM +0200, rosea grammostola wrote:

Don't feel pushed to do it, but if you have time, a tool that seems also
popular on the other OSs is paulstretch. To compete a bit with Abletons
timestretching features on Windows/Mac ;) It's open source but not in
Debian.

Of course for 'normal' timestretching there's already rubberband - paulstretch
seems to be for more exotic cases, but very powerful there.

Paulstretch is made by the famous Zynaddsubfx synth developer ... :)

http://createdigitalmusic.com/2010/08/extreme-time-stretched-hamsterdance-and-free-and-open-source-sound-treasures/

\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [OT] Qjackctl | Lucid

2011-06-18 Thread rosea grammostola

On 06/18/2011 07:09 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:

On 06/12/11 22:20, rosea grammostola wrote:


perl -i -pe 'chomp' \
debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop

Gives me a warning:

W: qjackctl: desktop-entry-file-has-crs
/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop:1

perl -i -pe 's/\x0D\x0A$ /\n/x' \
debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop

This seems to work.

I now took a slightly different approach and entirely dropped the
build dependency on those tools. Statically fixing the template file
and having quilt take care is the more elegant way.

I've also submitted the patch to upstream, so we can hopefully drop
it upon the next release.

I haven't uploaded the package, yet, just in case Alessio wants to
tweak something else before the next upload.
... there are some developments in qjackctl svn lately, to prevent 
overwriting a folder when saving a session (to avoid disasters...)


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


[OT] Jack-rack / autopoint / lucid

2011-06-18 Thread rosea grammostola

Hey,

Latest jack-rack has autopoint as build depends. Is that package really 
needed?

(causes problems when backporting to Lucid, which isn't there...)

Regards,

\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [OT] Qjackctl | Lucid

2011-06-12 Thread rosea grammostola

On 06/12/2011 02:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On 11-06-11 at 09:30pm, rosea grammostola wrote:

Hey,

This question is slightly OT...

I try to backport qjackctl 0.3.7 to Ubuntu 10.04. But the Debian
package depends on dos2unix, which is not in the Ubuntu Lucid build
environment. Is it possible to rm the dependency on dos2unix, how?

In debian/rules I find:

install/qjackctl::
 # Fix end-of-lines, convert CRLF to LF.
 dos2unix -ascii \
 debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop

If you want same functionality, I'd suggest try replace with this
command:

   recode /crlf../lf \
 debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop


Thanks for you help.
It fails with this message:

recode /crlf../lf \
debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop
Unrecognised surface name `lf'
recode: Request `/crlf../lf' is erroneous
make: *** [install/qjackctl] Error 1


Best,
\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [OT] Qjackctl | Lucid

2011-06-12 Thread rosea grammostola

On 06/12/2011 06:54 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On 11-06-12 at 06:29pm, rosea grammostola wrote:

I think you can also do this:

   perl -i -pe 'chomp' \
 debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop

Gives me a warning:

W: qjackctl: desktop-entry-file-has-crs
/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop:1



perl -i -pe 's/\x0D\x0A$ /\n/x' \
 debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop

This seems to work.

Regards,
\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


[OT] Qjackctl | Lucid

2011-06-11 Thread rosea grammostola

Hey,

This question is slightly OT...

I try to backport qjackctl 0.3.7 to Ubuntu 10.04. But the Debian package 
depends on dos2unix, which is not in the Ubuntu Lucid build environment. 
Is it possible to rm the dependency on dos2unix, how?


In debian/rules I find:

install/qjackctl::
# Fix end-of-lines, convert CRLF to LF.
dos2unix -ascii \
debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop

Best regards,

\r



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread rosea grammostola
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:23 PM, i...@bandshed.net wrote:

 Hi

 I'm not sure if libraw1394 falls under your jurisdiction or not but the
 latest release (November 1) supports daisy chaining multiple firewire
 devices on the new firewire stack when used with Kernel 2.6.36. Testing by
 AV Linux users has confirmed this.

 Note daisy chaining was previously only possible with the legacy firewire
 stack.

 I've seen some Squeeze exception requests for this that have been flatly
 denied (as Squeeze for multimedia slides hopelessly further into
 obsolescence)



Sure,still lots to improve, but there are some good developments imho and
some people work hard to make it as good as possible. You can ask yourself
what you're doing to improve the state of multimedia in Debian and/ or
squeeze...

Best regards,

\r
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: review ghostess

2010-09-06 Thread rosea grammostola
Hi,

There is a new upstream version with manpage now. I tried to merge it, but I
do get patches related messages when running git-buildpackage.

The short howto on the multimedia wiki says

resolve merge conflicts, review your changes e.g. with gitk

How to check if there are conflicts and how to resolve those? When i use
gitk I get a 'crappy' GUI with letters I can't read clearly...



done
dh_clean
rm -f debian/stamp-autotools-files
rm -f debian/cdbs-install-list debian/cdbs-package-list
debian/stamp-copyright-check debian/stamp-buildinfo
 dpkg-source -i -I -b ghostess
dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
dpkg-source: info: building ghostess using existing
./ghostess_20100905.orig.tar.bz2
patching file config.h.in
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file config.h.in.rej
patching file Makefile.in
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
15 out of 15 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file Makefile.in.rej
patching file configure.ac
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file configure.ac.rej
patching file config.guess
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
9 out of 9 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file config.guess.rej
patching file config.sub
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file config.sub.rej
patching file configure
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
381 out of 381 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file configure.rej
patching file Makefile.am
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file Makefile.am.rej
patching file aclocal.m4
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
22 out of 22 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file aclocal.m4.rej
patching file ChangeLog
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file ChangeLog.rej
The next patch would create the file ghostess.1,
which already exists!  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file ltmain.sh
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
8 out of 8 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file ltmain.sh.rej
patching file README
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file README.rej
patching file src/ghostess.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file src/ghostess.c.rej
patching file src/Makefile.in
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file src/Makefile.in.rej
patching file src/gtkknob.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file src/gtkknob.h.rej
patching file src/universal_gui.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file src/universal_gui.c.rej
patching file src/gtkknob.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
20 out of 20 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file src/gtkknob.c.rej
dpkg-source: error: LC_ALL=C patch -t -F 0 -N -p1 -u -V never -g0 -E -b -B
.pc/debian-changes-20100326-1/ 
ghostess.orig.J2_mCQ/debian/patches/debian-changes-20100326-1 gave error
exit status 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -i -I -b ghostess gave error exit
status 2
/usr/local/bin/gbp-pbuilder returned 2
Couldn't run '/usr/local/bin/gbp-pbuilder'
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Request to join

2010-09-01 Thread rosea grammostola
welcome!

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:

 Welcome aboard!


 --
 Alessio Treglia ales...@alessiotreglia.com
 Debian  Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0

 ___
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: jack-keyboard, ghostess review | upload

2010-08-30 Thread rosea grammostola
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.orgwrote:

 I wanted to say: I'm on jack-keyboard.


Great, thanks
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


jack-keyboard, ghostess review | upload

2010-08-29 Thread rosea grammostola
Hi,

Looks like a previous message got lost...

I think the packages jack-keyboard and ghostess are (almost) ready.

Would be nice if someone is able to upload it for me. (AFAIK Allesio is
taking care of ghostess)

Homepage: http://smbolton.com/linux.html
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia/ghostess.git
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/ghostess.git

Homepage: http://jack-keyboard.sourceforge.net
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/jack-keyboard.git
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/jack-keyboard.git


Thanks in advance,

\r
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Some interesting packages for Debian...

2010-08-29 Thread rosea grammostola
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:31 PM, rosea grammostola 
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,


 I reported some RFP bugs. Especially Paulstretch seems to be very
 interesting.
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594784

 See also:
 http://createdigitalmusic.com/2010/08/25/extreme-time-stretched-hamsterdance-and-free-and-open-source-sound-treasures/

 Other RFP bugs which might be of interest
 jack_oscrolloscope
 playitslowly
 AZR-3
 fluxus


Same is true for Smasher:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594799
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: review jack-keyboard

2010-08-27 Thread rosea grammostola
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:45:03PM +0200, rosea grammostola wrote:
  Please review and upload jack-keyboard, a midi keyboard for JACK MIDI
 
  http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/jack-keyboard.git/

 I'm pretty new to this as well, but fixing any lintian errors/warnings is
 generally a good start:

 Now running lintian...
 W: jack-keyboard: copyright-refers-to-deprecated-bsd-license-file



solved


 E: jack-keyboard: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate


solved



Could someone upload this package please? It's an virtual midi keyboard,
similar to Vkeybd but better and it uses JACK MIDI which is more accurate
then ALSA MIDI (for software).

Thanks in advance,

\r
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: review ghostess

2010-08-26 Thread rosea grammostola
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.orgwrote:

 I've fixed some packaging stuff.
 I can sponsor your uploads, if you like.


That would be nice.

Thanks in advance.

\r
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: review ghostess

2010-08-26 Thread rosea grammostola

 I see that you use CDBS.  Nice! :-D

 Then I suggest to use auto-resolving of build-dependencies (currently they
 are not quite optimal):

  1) copy debian/control to debian/control.in
  2) edit debian/control.in replacing cdbs build-dpendency with @cdbs@
  3) invoke the following command to regenerate debian/control:

DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot debian/rules clean

  4) Check what changed in the now auto-updated debian/control
  5) Remove manual entries from debian/control.in now auto-resolved


I don't understand this step. Also it's not always clear when I should do a
step or when CDBS is doing it for me...
I tried to play with it, not sure if I get it for 100% though.



  6) Repeat steps 3-5 until satisfied
  6) Commit debian/control.in
  7) Commit debian/control (separately!)


 I also suggest to enable tracking of copyright/licensing changes:

  1) Include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/utils.mk
  2) touch debian/copyright_hints
  3) Invoke the following to generate debian/copyright_newhints:

DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 debian/rules pre-build

  4) Rename debian/copyright_newhints to debian/copyright_hints
  5) Commit debian/copyright_hints

 After that, at each build the source is scanned for copyright and licensing
 hints, and changes compared to the saved hints file trigger a warning (or a
 failure if DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1).



I did this step.





 I also suggest you enable upstream-tarball handling - i.e. a
 get-orig-source build target:

  1) Include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/upstream-tarball.mk
  2) Add hints to get upstream source (have a look inside the actual
 upstream-tarball.mk file, or look at e.g. jackd2 for an example)



I skipped this one. To keep it a bit simple for me atm.


I've asked the upstream author to provide a manpage and desktop file.

Regards,

\r
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


What to do with Ladish

2010-08-20 Thread rosea grammostola
Hi,

Some time back there was a little discussion about packaging Ladish or
not (www.ladish.org). Ladish is a Linux audio session manager, which
stores projects, launched apps, jack connections etc.

At this time pretty some apps have Ladish support or will have it in the
next release, for example:

Rosegarden
Qtractor
Yoshimi
Hydrogen
Jack-mixer
Bristol
Ams

Even if Ladish will not be in Debian, it would be good imo to have those
apps with Ladish support enabled (dunno if that's possible), so people
who want to use Ladish don't have to re-package all those apps themselves.

Regards,

\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#582644: qtractor: new upstream release (0.4.6)

2010-05-22 Thread rosea grammostola
Package: qtractor
Version: 0.4.5-2+b1
Severity: wishlist

New upstream release



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages qtractor depends on:
ii  libasound2  1.0.22-2 shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6   2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libgcc1 1:4.4.4-1GCC support library
ii  libjack01.9.2-0.64studio2~lenny1 JACK Audio Connection Kit (client 
ii  liblo7  0.26~repack-5Lightweight OSC library
ii  libmad0 0.15.1b-5MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libogg0 1.2.0~dfsg-1 Ogg bitstream library
ii  libqt4-xml  4:4.6.2-4Qt 4 XML module
ii  libqtcore4  4:4.6.2-4Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4   4:4.6.2-4Qt 4 GUI module
ii  librubberband2  1.3-1.1+b1   an audio time-stretching and pitch
ii  libsamplerate0  0.1.7-3  Audio sample rate conversion libra
ii  libslv2-9   0.6.6-3  A library for simple use of LV2 pl
ii  libsndfile1 1.0.21-2 Library for reading/writing audio 
ii  libstdc++6  4.4.4-1  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libvorbis0a 1.3.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisenc2   1.3.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile3  1.3.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libx11-62:1.3.3-3X11 client-side library

qtractor recommends no packages.

qtractor suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Jack2 in debian

2010-01-07 Thread rosea grammostola

Jaromír Mikeš wrote:

Od: Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com



  

www.ladish.org

  

Interesting.

Jaromír, what do you think about working together on that?



I just watched http://www.ladish.org/wiki/demovideo ... looks interesting ...

You will setup repo?
I can start work on it in the evening ... 
I suggest you to talk about it with the author, Nedko on #ladi @ 
freenode. He did some packaging for Ubuntu in the past and he is willing 
to help you, I'm sure about that.


\r


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


how do I update a package?

2009-12-14 Thread rosea grammostola

Hi

how do I update a package using git?


\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers