On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 20:35:55 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
When do you plan starting the transition? How about opening it with
Libav 10.1? ;-)
I think we are in a pretty good position for startin now.
I
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 20:35:55 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
When do you plan starting the transition? How about opening it with
Libav
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:25:49 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
for the rest, I'd think that there is a very good chance that the
respective maintainers are going to fix them before they turn out to
be actual blockers of the transition. If they do, let's remove them
temporarily from testing.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:25:49 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
for the rest, I'd think that there is a very good chance that the
respective maintainers are going to fix them before they turn out to
be actual blockers
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:05:55 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Would a timeline like this work for you:
- T: upload libav to unstable
- T+0: upgrade all FTBFS bugs to serious severity,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:05:55 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Would a timeline like this work for you:
- T:
On dom, mag 11, 2014 at 12:05:55 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
For reference last time took 2 months.
I'll be doing my best to make it happen faster this time.
If help is needed I can lend a hand.
Cheers
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org wrote:
On dom, mag 11, 2014 at 12:05:55 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
For reference last time took 2 months.
I'll be doing my best to make it
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
When do you plan starting the transition? How about opening it with
Libav 10.1? ;-)
I think we are in a pretty good position for startin now.
I agree. Let me upload 10.1 this weekend to unstable to finally start
this
Hi Reinhard,
2014-03-01 17:01 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
I made a rebuild and the transitions isn't ready to go at all.
IMO the API changes are far too agressive; if 2/3 of all packages in
the
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
I made a rebuild and the transitions isn't ready to go at all.
IMO the API changes are far too agressive; if 2/3 of all packages in
the archive FTBFS, the affected APIs are clearly not that deprecated.
I can understand
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We have a new libav transition pending. Libav 10 is prepared in
debian/experimental, and I've started to build packges against this new
version; in fact, more or more packages
12 matches
Mail list logo
