On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:12:06PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:25:24 (EDT), mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
+Files: ./DotEmacs
+Copyright: 2001 Fernando Lopez Lezcano
+License: no licence mentioned
uh, does no license mean "all rights reserved" and a
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> uh, does no license mean "all rights reserved" and are we actually
> allowed to redistribute it?
We used to consider those files released under the same terms of the
sources but, actually, I don't know if this is a right way.
> more seri
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:25:24 (EDT), mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
> +Files: ./DotEmacs
> +Copyright: 2001 Fernando Lopez Lezcano
> +License: no licence mentioned
uh, does no license mean "all rights reserved" and are we actually
allowed to redistribute it?
more seriously, are
