On 2014-05-12 17:27:24, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi
On 2014-04-23 10:06:37, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com
wrote:
Refresh patches, drop libav10.patch as it was adopted upstream.
I believe that there
Hi
On 2014-04-23 10:06:37, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
Refresh patches, drop libav10.patch as it was adopted upstream.
I believe that there is nothing left to do, right?
I forwarded the patch to
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
Refresh patches, drop libav10.patch as it was adopted upstream.
I believe that there is nothing left to do, right?
I forwarded the patch to Gabriel and it looks he's found a cleaner way
the achieve the
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
Hi there,
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:46 AM, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
diff --git a/debian/patches/libav10.patch b/debian/patches/libav10.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..0ccbd30
--- /dev/null
Hi there,
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:46 AM, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
diff --git a/debian/patches/libav10.patch b/debian/patches/libav10.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..0ccbd30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/libav10.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,1173 @@
+Description: Fix
