Hi all,
I have checked the rpmfusion package for avidemux and they have
patched it to use the system libraries for libass, liba52, llibmad and
libtwolame at least. Furthermore, the package has BuildRequires:
ffmpeg-devel but I could not found a patch to force it to use the
system ffmpeg
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have checked the rpmfusion package for avidemux and they have patched it
to use the system libraries for libass, liba52, llibmad and libtwolame at
least. Furthermore, the package has BuildRequires:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I took over mantainership around 2.5.3 so I'm not the original author
of the spec file. Now that I think about it I probably don't need to
BR:
Am 05.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I'm a bit confused now. Fabian noticed that Fedora's avidemux 2.5.3
package already did unbundle ffmpeg. Is this untrue? Or did I
misunderstand you two?
No, I just noticed that *some* libraries are unbundled and that the
package Build-Depends on
On Mo, Jan 02, 2012 at 16:37:57 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
owner 203211 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
severity 203211 wishlist
tags 203211 =
thanks
This ITP looks like a perfect candidate for the pkg-multimedia team
now.
Indeed, I've enjoyed using it in the past
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 16:53, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Does it nowadays work properly with the system libav, or does it still
require its internal copy? If the latter, then it's going to be a lot of
work to get it in shape.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 16:53, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Does it nowadays work properly with the system libav, or does it still
require its internal
Am 03.01.2012 00:14, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
avidemux specifically downloads an ffmpeg-0.9 tarball (we use libav in
debian), and
then applies a larger number of patches:
http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/avidemux/branches/avidemux_2.5_branch_gruntster/cmake/patches/
Wow, sounds like the worst
Am 03.01.2012 08:31, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I think I have a doable solution: Let's have the avidemux source
package build depend on libav-source, and have avidemux's build
system apply its patches on that source. This way we have the
code duplication only in the binary code, but no longer
