On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 18:08:04 -0300, Sergio Cipolla secipo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
They _are_ crappy. They have kept on breaking VLC, both upstream and
Debian's in my annoying and weird ways throughout the years. Fabian is
right.
Am 04.03.2012 22:08, schrieb Sergio Cipolla:
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
I can't tell the same of you.
I think I am contributing long enough to Debian to
Please Fabian give us an example of what is broken with d-m.o
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On 12-03-05 at 03:37pm, Debian NonFree wrote:
Please Fabian give us an example of what is broken with d-m.o
Please stop holding Debian responsible for however d-m.o works!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x]
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 05.03.2012 15:37, schrieb Debian NonFree:
Please Fabian give us an example of what is broken with d-m.o
As if users being unable to upgrade their VLC package isn't enough.
For a recent example see e.g. here:
Am 05.03.2012 15:37, schrieb Debian NonFree:
Please Fabian give us an example of what is broken with d-m.o
As if users being unable to upgrade their VLC package isn't enough.
For a recent example see e.g. here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652250
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
I can't tell the same of you.
You know very well why it uses an epoch in their versioning: exactly
so as people that want/need to
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:22:27PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
I'm not sure what you're referring to exactly.
Oh, you were referring to a comment in bug #660814 - sorry, I didn't notice
that.
Arnout
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:08:04PM -0300, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
I can't tell the same of you.
I'm not sure if you're a Debian Maintainer or not (or worse, Debian
Developer) but this kind of big
On 12-03-04 at 06:08pm, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
I can't tell the same of you.
You are correct, Sergio: Debian never was as
Hi Sergio.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Sergio Cipolla secipo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
While many d-m-o's packages are non
11 matches
Mail list logo
