retitle 732159 RM: mplayer - RoM - unmaintained, RC-buggy, alternatives exist
reassign 732159 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
- Last upload nearly two years
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 732159 RM: mplayer - RoM - unmaintained, RC-buggy, alternatives exist
Bug #732159 [mplayer] Should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: mplayer - RoM - unmaintained, RC-buggy, alternatives
exist' from 'Should this package be
TBH, I'm a bit confused about your reply.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger
reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger
reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
What would
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:24:01AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
TBH, I'm a bit confused about your reply.
I probably lost track of the point I was trying to make.
I so far assumed that this issue was, bluntly put, about
almost exclusively
1) MPlayer does not work against Libav
But what you
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger
reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
What would constitute a constructive comment?
Ideally I am interested in making mplayer work against the libavcodec
that we have in Debian,
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:07:36PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
- Last upload nearly two years ago
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:07:36PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:07:36PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger
reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
In lack of any *constructive* comments about this, I would say yes,
let's remove them.
What would constitute a constructive comment?
Ideally I
Hi ,
The option -demuxer lavf works ! Thanks a lot!
Please close the bug report #731937.
2014/1/8 Xiangyu Liu u122...@gmail.com
Hi ,
The option -demuxer lavf works ! Thanks a lot!
Please close the bug report #731937.
By the way, When I met problem in #731937, I have read the manual
On 29.12.2013 06:04, Xiangyu Liu wrote:
For some specific MKV files, mplayer2 has problem to sync A/V, but
mplayer works fine. I've filed a bug.
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731937 )
MPlayer and MPlayer2 use different Matroska demuxers by default. Try
passing both
Hi,
For some specific MKV files, mplayer2 has problem to sync A/V, but mplayer
works fine. I've filed a bug.
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731937 )
If possible, please keep the mplayer in Debian. Gentoo has new upstream
versions of Mplayer (1.1.1, and 1.2_pre20130729) that
On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If so, please
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Well, to be honest, I think the problem is actually libav, not mplayer.
Most users prefer the original ffmpeg over libav from my own experience.
Agreed
Furthermore, I still do not understand why
2013/12/15 Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de:
On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
- Last upload nearly two years ago
- FTBFS for a long time
- Incompatible with current libav
- Alternatives exist (mplayer2, mpv)
Cheers,
Moritz
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
- Last upload nearly two years ago
- FTBFS for a long time
- Incompatible with current libav
- Alternatives exist (mplayer2, mpv)
I definitely
I've added debian-devel for further input, as I believe the
consequences are a bit wider than expected.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
-
On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
- Last upload nearly two years ago
- FTBFS for a long time
19 matches
Mail list logo
