Re: Bug#781938: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
Hello, One month later, I still haven't forgotten that task, sorry for the delay ;) new upload here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vid.stab Le mardi 27 octobre 2015, 00:16:57 Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : [snip] > * d/control: > - 'Priority: optional' not extra > - packages should be 'Multi-Arch: same' > * d/copyright: misses copyright of 'Alexey Osipov' Done, thanks for guidance! > The tests could be run e.g. with: > cd tests; cmake .; make all; ./tests > However, the return code is wrong [2]. I included your patch, but I'm not sure how to add & run test target in debian/rules. This might go into future improvements, with the runtime loading of SSE on i386? (Felipe's suggestion) I don't know if this packaging activity is worth versioning on alioth, as upstream doesn't seem to evolve any/much more? If yes anyway, am I allowed to initialize a git repo? Many thanks again, Cheers, Vincent. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#781938: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
On 29 November 2015 at 18:17, Vincent Pinonwrote: > Hello, > > One month later, I still haven't forgotten that task, sorry for the delay ;) > new upload here: > http://mentors.debian.net/package/vid.stab > > Le mardi 27 octobre 2015, 00:16:57 Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : > [snip] >> * d/control: >> - 'Priority: optional' not extra >> - packages should be 'Multi-Arch: same' >> * d/copyright: misses copyright of 'Alexey Osipov' > Done, thanks for guidance! > >> The tests could be run e.g. with: >> cd tests; cmake .; make all; ./tests >> However, the return code is wrong [2]. > I included your patch, but I'm not sure how to add & run test target in > debian/rules. You can do: override_dh_auto_test: #test commands here > This might go into future improvements, with the runtime loading of SSE on > i386? (Felipe's suggestion) I'd add -DSSE2_FOUND=false to the cmake invocation when run on i386. This appears to be enough to disable the sse flags > > I don't know if this packaging activity is worth versioning on alioth, as > upstream doesn't seem to evolve any/much more? > If yes anyway, am I allowed to initialize a git repo? I think git history is always useful, although pre-first release history not so much (so we can create the repo with the uploaded package). Please apply to the pkg-multimedia project on alioth, and read the wiki https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-multimedia https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#781938: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
On 26.10.2015 23:00, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 26 October 2015 at 18:34, Andreas Cadhalpun >wrote: >> On 26.10.2015 13:15, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> I see that Andreas Cadhalpun (in CC) expressed interest in this >>> package and apparently already forwarded that patch upstream. Andreas, >>> did you ever get a response on that? >> >> No, unfortunately not. That's why I didn't pursue this any further, >> as I assumed that upstream is not active anymore. Am I wrong about that? > > The last commit in github[1] is from May. So not really active, no. > But that doesn't mean we shouldn't provide the package (as long as > there is a willing maintainer). Yes, it just means that one can't expect any help from upstream. Regarding Vincent's packaging: * d/control: - 'Priority: optional' not extra - packages should be 'Multi-Arch: same' * d/copyright: misses copyright of 'Alexey Osipov' The tests could be run e.g. with: cd tests; cmake .; make all; ./tests However, the return code is wrong [2]. Best regards, Andreas 2: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=2;filename=0002-tests-return-0-upon-success.patch;bug=781938;msg=20 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
Hi. On Oct 26 2015, Felipe Sateler wrote: > I'm adding the ITP (and all participants) back to CC to let them know > about your work. Please, go ahead. I'm way too busy right now to maintain this package at this moment. Thanks, -- Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC http://cynic.cc/blog/ : github.com/rbrito : profiles.google.com/rbrito DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
On 26 October 2015 at 02:00, Vincent Pinonwrote: >> - You might want to keep the epoch so that people installing those >> packages can upgrade to this version when it lands in debian. > I also think that we should start with a clear base in Debian, > so I reset the changelog (wiping the dmo & ubuntu-ppa mix, but keeping > copyright)... > >> - Please use the alioth list as the maintainer (check any other team >> package [eg, csound] for the name and address). In general please read >> the guidelines in the wiki[1] > Sorry, fixed, and read again the ref page :) > >> - Please drop the builddeb override, xz is the default. > done > >> - On i386, we need to disable sse, as it is not guaranteed to be >> available on all hosts. I think it can be loaded at runtime by using >> the hardware capabilities feature of glibc linker: >>- Compile the package twice, once with and once without sse. >>- Ship the non-sse version in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ >>- Ship the sse version in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2 >>- Then ld.so will choose the appropriate version at runtime (see >> the ld.so manpage for details). > Hum, a bit beyond my packaging knowledge... > Do you have an example? It is a bit convoluted. Maybe we could start by force-disabling SSE on i386 and then later add a second sse version? > >> - debian/copyright needs dates updated (2010-2014 for the upstream part). > Done > > All these changes in forced-upload again: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/vid.stab > >> - You might want to forward the patch upstream. > Right, I will do it I see that Andreas Cadhalpun (in CC) expressed interest in this package and apparently already forwarded that patch upstream. Andreas, did you ever get a response on that? I'm adding the ITP (and all participants) back to CC to let them know about your work. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
> - You might want to keep the epoch so that people installing those > packages can upgrade to this version when it lands in debian. I also think that we should start with a clear base in Debian, so I reset the changelog (wiping the dmo & ubuntu-ppa mix, but keeping copyright)... > - Please use the alioth list as the maintainer (check any other team > package [eg, csound] for the name and address). In general please read > the guidelines in the wiki[1] Sorry, fixed, and read again the ref page :) > - Please drop the builddeb override, xz is the default. done > - On i386, we need to disable sse, as it is not guaranteed to be > available on all hosts. I think it can be loaded at runtime by using > the hardware capabilities feature of glibc linker: >- Compile the package twice, once with and once without sse. >- Ship the non-sse version in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ >- Ship the sse version in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2 >- Then ld.so will choose the appropriate version at runtime (see > the ld.so manpage for details). Hum, a bit beyond my packaging knowledge... Do you have an example? > - debian/copyright needs dates updated (2010-2014 for the upstream part). Done All these changes in forced-upload again: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vid.stab > - You might want to forward the patch upstream. Right, I will do it > This library looks very cool :) I don't use it myself, but many Kdenlive users love it and miss it in debian/ubuntu Thanks a lot for your feedback! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
Le dimanche 25 octobre 2015 16:54:59, Felipe Sateler a écrit : > On 25 October 2015 at 16:14, Vincent Pinonwrote: > > Sorry for the late answer, I was on holiday trip with family... > > I just re-uploaded both vid.stab_0.98b-1_amd64.changes and added > > vid.stab_0.98b-1_source.changes > > (added symbols file and fixed last lintian warnings in the meantime). > > I need a link to the sources ;) I sent the files through "dput mentors vid.stab_0.98b-1_amd64.changes" > > And please keep the list in CC Hello list! ;) Cheers, Vincent signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
On 25 October 2015 at 17:21, Vincent Pinonwrote: > Le dimanche 25 octobre 2015 16:54:59, Felipe Sateler a écrit : >> On 25 October 2015 at 16:14, Vincent Pinon wrote: >> > Sorry for the late answer, I was on holiday trip with family... >> > I just re-uploaded both vid.stab_0.98b-1_amd64.changes and added >> > vid.stab_0.98b-1_source.changes >> > (added symbols file and fixed last lintian warnings in the meantime). >> >> I need a link to the sources ;) > I sent the files through "dput mentors vid.stab_0.98b-1_amd64.changes" OK, so this is the package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vid.stab But it seems it is not the new version, as it does not have the symbols file. Anyway, some more comments: - You might want to keep the epoch so that people installing those packages can upgrade to this version when it lands in debian. - Please use the alioth list as the maintainer (check any other team package [eg, csound] for the name and address). In general please read the guidelines in the wiki[1] - Please drop the builddeb override, xz is the default. - On i386, we need to disable sse, as it is not guaranteed to be available on all hosts. I think it can be loaded at runtime by using the hardware capabilities feature of glibc linker: - Compile the package twice, once with and once without sse. - Ship the non-sse version in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ - Ship the sse version in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2 - Then ld.so will choose the appropriate version at runtime (see the ld.so manpage for details). - debian/copyright needs dates updated (2010-2014 for the upstream part). - You might want to forward the patch upstream. This library looks very cool :) [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2015-10-25 22:10:15) > - You might want to keep the epoch so that people installing those > packages can upgrade to this version when it lands in debian. If I understand you correctly to recommend adding an epoch to a package to ease transistions of *non-Debian* prior installs, then I disagree. Please do not clutter Debian packages with info to fit unofficial packages or packages from derivatives. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
Hi Vincent, On 12 October 2015 at 01:08, Vincent Pinonwrote: > Hello, > > I posted my introduction message to the wrong list, just understanding 1 > month after... > Here it comes again ;-) Do you have a link to the source package? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Fwd: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1
Hello, I posted my introduction message to the wrong list, just understanding 1 month after... Here it comes again ;-) Vincent -- Message transmis -- Objet : RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1 Date : vendredi 11 septembre 2015, 22:26:35 De : Vincent Pinon <vpi...@april.org> À : debian-multime...@lists.debian.org Hello dear multimedia team, I am Vincent Pinon, Kdenlive developer and long time Debian user. I have been thinking of joining your team for years, and today I seized the opportunity of having Debian Devs around me (at KDE Sprint in Randa) to get guided in packaging process :-) So I began my packaging activity with a small one : the vid.stab (video deshaking filter) was missing for years in archive, despite of an old ITP (709193)... So here is the package, imported from a Ubuntu PPA, and cleaned a bit. Next steps would be to use it in mlt builds, and even ffmpeg & transcode. Hope this helps, please explain if anything is wrong. Cheers! Vincent. - signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers