Bug#802710: marked as done (musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace)
Your message dated Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:36:32 + with message-id <e1f3qni-000ase...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#802710: fixed in musescore 2.2.1+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #802710, regarding musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 802710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802710 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: musescore Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1 Severity: important Hi! While doing qt5's qtbase's private headers transition we noted that musescore got into the list of packages that needed a transition [lop] but without build depending on qtbase5-dev. [lop] <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-5-1.html> My teammate Dmitry Schanev found out that musescore ships a Qt5 private header: <http://sources.debian.net/src/musescore/2.0.2%2Bdfsg-1/thirdparty/xmlstream/xmlutils_p.h/> By building this header without a namespace the symbols that it generates matchs the symbols of qtbase's private stuff, so unnecesarily being part of transitions like this. This is easily solvable by putting the headers under a namespace (like musescore3rdparty, for example) and using them trough it. Another better solution is to avoid embedding private stuff at all, of course :) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: musescore Source-Version: 2.2.1+dfsg1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of musescore, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 802...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> (supplier of updated musescore package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:51:10 +0200 Source: musescore Binary: musescore musescore-common Architecture: source Version: 2.2.1+dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> Description: musescore - Free music composition and notation software musescore-common - Free music composition and notation software (common files) Closes: 802710 Changes: musescore (2.2.1+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (and update upstream release note links) * Upload to unstable * debian/watch: don’t pick up upstream RCs (as newer than the stable release), releases and (our) snapshots only * debian/repack: handle API errors better (visible for the packager) * debian/rules: pass Freetype include path to cmake explicitly (compatibility with older cmake versions, for backports) * debian/control: spell more dependencies explicitly, for backports . musescore (2.2~pre20180325+dfsg1-1) experimental; urgency=high . * Merge musescore (2.1.0+dfsg3-3) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream snapshot - Renamed MS_General soundfont to MuseScore_General :| * Bump dependency version for fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont accordingly * Remove now-unnecessary (or so…) patches . musescore (2.2~pre20180316+dfsg1-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Merge musescore (2.1.0+dfsg3-1) unstable; urgency=high * Merge musescore (2.1.0+dfsg3-2) unstable; urgency=low: + Fix copyright file for fonts, latest licences from upstream o (keep patches to fix note collisions) + Recommend libmp3lame0 (currently dlopen()ed for MP3 export) + Add debian/upstream/metadata as requested by lintian - (allow Qt 5.10 for 2.2) + Add non-standard field “CLA” to UMEGAYA metadata (boldly
Bug#802710: marked as done (musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2018 12:20:09 + with message-id <e1esp69-000ib5...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#802710: fixed in musescore 2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #802710, regarding musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 802710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802710 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: musescore Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1 Severity: important Hi! While doing qt5's qtbase's private headers transition we noted that musescore got into the list of packages that needed a transition [lop] but without build depending on qtbase5-dev. [lop] <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-5-1.html> My teammate Dmitry Schanev found out that musescore ships a Qt5 private header: <http://sources.debian.net/src/musescore/2.0.2%2Bdfsg-1/thirdparty/xmlstream/xmlutils_p.h/> By building this header without a namespace the symbols that it generates matchs the symbols of qtbase's private stuff, so unnecesarily being part of transitions like this. This is easily solvable by putting the headers under a namespace (like musescore3rdparty, for example) and using them trough it. Another better solution is to avoid embedding private stuff at all, of course :) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: musescore Source-Version: 2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of musescore, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 802...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> (supplier of updated musescore package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 03:38:42 +0100 Source: musescore Binary: musescore musescore-common Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> Description: musescore - Free music composition and notation software musescore-common - Free music composition and notation software (common files) Closes: 802710 Changes: musescore (2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1) experimental; urgency=high . * Bump Qt dependency to at least Qt 5.4 for QVector.removeOne() * New upstream snapshot of upcoming release (Closes: #802710) * Forward patches upstream, update DEP-3 patch headers * Fix PCH; build with PCH to speed up package build * Make all system-wide soundfonts available to MuseScore * Address new lintian concerns * Add patches to fix note collisions in playback and MIDI export * Allow separately-packaged version of fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont * Repack to exclude source-less soundfont from origtgz * Fix copyright file for fonts and icons Checksums-Sha1: 62764f0ef8e1162fcfd96eed14b95a036ddf104b 2591 musescore_2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1.dsc ba485f1637a9f1241a594d11d7fc186ffab55a37 23261648 musescore_2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1.orig.tar.xz fefe68807a57cb4eec9e1e789d64ce0acf7f3be6 40400 musescore_2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz affa48d8244a5337b771491536fce13848b3cb74 3077132 musescore-common_2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1_all.deb 8b587623c85c4a8cebd6bb4f875d8ebf5073bcaa 113097352 musescore-dbgsym_2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1_amd64.deb 3760a588d665e050a3f0100b55e8d9e8cfdf008f 12917 musescore_2.2~pre20180302+dfsg1-1_amd64.buildinfo fd7596f73017ad89023ad0ab4b284c724b48c365 8144808 musescore_2.2~pre2018030
Bug#802710: Fwd: [MuseScore] Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace
Things are getting fixed upstream.--- Begin Message --- Comment by ericfontainejazz: Please see https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/3498 [1] which removes that private header entirely. That might fix this bug as well. Cross-linking to that PR's issue: #269845: may crash before splash screen on 2.1, 2.2, or master with Qt 5.10 due to diverged copy-and-pasted QPaintEnginePrivate header file [2] — You are receiving this because you are subscribed on this thread. View it on MuseScore [3] or unsubscribe from this thread [4]. [1] https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/3498 [2] https://musescore.org/en/node/269845 [3] https://musescore.org/en/comment/822285#comment-822285 [4] https://musescore.org/settings/subscriptions --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Comment by lasconic: The PR above is merged. No more private headers. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed on this thread. View it on MuseScore [1] or unsubscribe from this thread [2]. [1] https://musescore.org/en/comment/822514#comment-822514 [2] https://musescore.org/settings/subscriptions --- End Message --- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#890103: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pd-iemtab | 1.20-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; included in pd-iemutils -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 890...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/890103 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#889742: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: openshot | 1.4.3-1.2 | source, all openshot-doc | 1.4.3-1.2 | all --- Reason --- ROM; Superseeded by openshot-qt -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 889...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/889742 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#881104: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libhdcd | 1.3-2 | source libhdcd-dev | 1.3-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libhdcd1 | 1.3-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; unused library -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 881...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/881104 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lamb (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#870936: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mediatomb | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1 | source, all mediatomb-common | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1+b2 | mips64el mediatomb-common | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1+b4 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 mediatomb-common | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1+b5 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x mediatomb-daemon | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1 | all mediatomb-dbg | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1+b2 | mips64el mediatomb-dbg | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1+b4 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 mediatomb-dbg | 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1+b5 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- RoM; dead upstream, obsoleted by gerbera -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 870...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/870936 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#877115: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: iannix | 0.9.17~dfsg0-3 | armel, armhf --- Reason --- RoQA; cannot build anymore due to Qt using OpenGL ES -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 877...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/877115 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#875655: suil should provide module toolkit package(s)
Source: suil Version: 0.8.4~dfsg0-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, suil should provide module toolkit package(s) and not have a single package that depends on multiple toolkits like QT and GTK etc. Reference - Mailing list thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/09/msg00143.html Regards Phil -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Instagram: kathenasorg signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#870436: Removed package(s) from experimental
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from experimental: morituri |0.2.3-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; obsolete, already removed from unstable -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 870...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/870436 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lamb (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#859808: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: composite | 0.006.2+dfsg0-7 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x composite-data | 0.006.2+dfsg0-7 | all --- Reason --- RoM; dead upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 859...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/859808 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lamb (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
S
Can we talk ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
S
Can we talk ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
S
Can we talk ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#849587: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: lv2core | 6.0+dfsg0-3 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; dead upstream; replaced by lv2-dev -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 849...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/849587 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#845419: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: zynaddsubfx |2.5.4-2 | armel zynaddsubfx-dbg |2.5.4-2 | armel zynaddsubfx-dssi |2.5.4-2 | armel --- Reason --- ROM; uses std::future -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 845...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/845419 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#844266: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: sineshaper |0.4.2-8 | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips64el sineshaper | 0.4.2-8+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el sineshaper | 0.4.2-8+b3 | s390x --- Reason --- ROM; package is abandoned upstream; RC buggy -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 844...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/844266 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#844266: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.4.2-8+rm Dear submitter, as the package sineshaper has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/844266 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#844265: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libslv2-9 | 0.6.6+dfsg1-3 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libslv2-dev | 0.6.6+dfsg1-3 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x slv2 | 0.6.6+dfsg1-3 | source slv2-doc | 0.6.6+dfsg1-3 | all slv2-jack | 0.6.6+dfsg1-3 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; dead upstream; replaced by lilv -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 844...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/844265 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#843850: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xbmc | 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 | source, all xbmc-addons-dev | 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 | all xbmc-eventclients-common | 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 | all xbmc-eventclients-dev | 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 | all xbmc-eventclients-j2me | 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 | all xbmc-eventclients-ps3 | 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 | all xbmc-eventclients-xbmc-send | 2:13.2+dfsg1-6 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; superseded by kodi -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 843...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/843850 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#802710: musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace
Package: musescore Version: 2.0.3+dfsg1-2 Followup-For: Bug #802710 Dear Maintainer, on my system musescore is blocking the update to the latest Qt5 packages in unstable as it depends on qtbase-abi-5-6-1. Is this bug the cause of it? Thanks, Antonio -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages musescore depends on: ii desktop-file-utils 0.23-1 ii libasound2 1.1.2-1 ii libc62.24-5 ii libfreetype6 2.6.3-3+b1 ii libgcc1 1:6.2.0-10 ii libportaudio219+svn20140130-1.1 ii libpulse09.0-4 ii libqt5core5a [qtbase-abi-5-6-1] 5.6.1+dfsg-3+b1 ii libqt5gui5 5.6.1+dfsg-3+b1 ii libqt5help5 5.6.1-4 ii libqt5network5 5.6.1+dfsg-3+b1 ii libqt5printsupport5 5.6.1+dfsg-3+b1 ii libqt5qml5 5.6.1-11 ii libqt5quick5 5.6.1-11 ii libqt5sql5-sqlite5.6.1+dfsg-3+b1 ii libqt5svg5 5.6.1-2 ii libqt5webkit55.6.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5widgets5 5.6.1+dfsg-3+b1 ii libqt5xml5 5.6.1+dfsg-3+b1 ii libqt5xmlpatterns5 5.6.1-2 ii libsndfile1 1.0.27-1 ii libstdc++6 6.2.0-10 ii libvorbisfile3 1.3.5-3 ii musescore-common 2.0.3+dfsg1-2 ii qml-module-qtquick-controls 5.6.1-3 ii qml-module-qtquick-dialogs 5.6.1-3 ii qml-module-qtquick-layouts 5.6.1-3 ii qml-module-qtquick2 5.6.1-11 ii shared-mime-info 1.7-1 ii xdg-utils1.1.1-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b3 Versions of packages musescore recommends: ii pulseaudio-utils 9.0-4 Versions of packages musescore suggests: ii fluid-soundfont-gm 3.1-5 pn timgm6mb-soundfont -- no debconf information -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Aplikacijom smo pokrenuli novi tehnološki trend u komunikaciji s građanima.
Pogledajte ovaj mail u browseru (http://us13.campaign-archive2.com/?u=cf0c41c295277060651abf139=f4f166bd6a=342c5f1d47) http://www.hdz.hr/ ** Preuzmi aplikaciju Vjerodostojno i poslušaj poruku Andreja Plenkovića! Aplikacija „Vjerodostojno“ na inovativan način želi korisnicima pametnih uređaja predstaviti poruku predsjednika Hrvatske demokratske zajednice Andreja Plenkovića upućenu mladima. Nakon pokretanja aplikacije i usmjeravanja kamere Vašeg pametnog uređaja prema bilo kojem formatu otisnutog materijala (billboard, citylight, novine, plakat, letak) na kojem se nalazi Andrej Plenković, pokrenut će se video poruka. U nekoliko jednostavnih koraka pokrenite aplikaciju i poslušajte poruku: 1. Otvorite Apple App Store (https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=1142941301=8) ili Google Play Store (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.HDZ.AugmentedReality2016=en) i preuzmite aplikaciju “Vjerodostojno” (http://vjerodostojno.hr/aplikacija) ** https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=1142941301=8 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.HDZ.AugmentedReality2016=en 2. Pokrenite aplikaciju na vašem pametnom uređaju 3. Usmjerite kameru vašeg pametnog uređaja prema bilo kojem formatu otisnutog materijala na kojem se nalazi Andrej Plenković (npr. plakat, letak i dr.) Više informacija na vjerodostojno.hr (http://www.vjerodostojno.hr) http://vjerodostojno.hr/aplikacija ** (http//www.hdz.hr/) ** 130x60 (http://www.hdz.hr) ** (https//www.facebook.com/hdz1989/) ** 32x32x3 (https://www.facebook.com/HDZ1989/) ** (https//twitter.com/hdz001) ** 32x32x4 (https://twitter.com/hdz001) ** (https//www.youtube.com/c/hdzhr#g/c/b2fdf8656310beed) ** 32x32x5 (https://www.youtube.com/c/hdzhr#g/c/B2FDF8656310BEED) ©2016, Sva prava - Hrvatska demokratska zajednica Ovu obavijest dobivate jer ste prijavljeni na newsletter Hrvatske demokratske zajednice ili vas je netko preporučio. Ako više ne želite primati obavijesti molimo vas da se odjavite ** ovdje (http://vjerodostojno.us13.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=cf0c41c295277060651abf139=4810754b59=342c5f1d47=f4f166bd6a) . Ako ste ovu poruku primili pogreškom molimo da nas o tome informirate u najkraćem roku na www.hdz.hr. Hrvatska demokratska zajednica informacije šalje u najboljoj namjeri te ne odgovara za moguće posljedice radnji koje iz njih proizlaze. S obzirom na to da e-mail komunikacije nije u potpunosti neporeciva i sigurna, HDZ ne preuzima odgovornost za eventualnu štetu uslijed zaraženosti e-mail poruke virusom ili drugim štetnim programom, neovlaštenih intervencija u sadržaj, pogrešne ili zakašnjele dostave poruke te prenošenje informacija koje originalni izvor koristi neovlašteno. Na zahtjev će takve informacije biti obrisane. HDZ zadržava pravo nadziranja i pohranjivanja e-mail poruka koje se šalju putem redovnog newslettera te onih koje pristižu kao odgovor."___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#834049: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: milkytracker | 0.90.85+dfsg-2.2 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; B-D librtmidi-dev no longer available on kfreebsd-any -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 834...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/834049 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#833873: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gpac | 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-2+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 gpac-modules-base | 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-2+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 libgpac-dev | 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-2+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 libgpac4 | 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-2+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 x264 | 2:0.148.2699+gita5e06b9-1 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; unsatisfiable B-D: libfreenect-dev and libgpac-dev -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 833...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/833873 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784457: marked as done ([clam-networkeditor] Qt4's WebKit removal)
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:39:19 + with message-id <e1buwof-0005hr...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#833073: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #784457, regarding [clam-networkeditor] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 784457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: clam-networkeditor Version: 1.4.0-3.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html> Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.4.0-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package clam-networkeditor has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/833073 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message --- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#833075: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: clam |1.4.0-7 | source libclam-dev |1.4.0-7 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libclam-doc |1.4.0-7 | all libclam1.4v5 |1.4.0-7 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; RC-buggy, unmaintained since 2011 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 833...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/833075 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#833075: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.4.0-7+rm Dear submitter, as the package clam has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/833075 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#833073: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: clam-networkeditor | 1.4.0-3.1 | source, mips64el clam-networkeditor | 1.4.0-3.1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x clam-networkeditor-examples | 1.4.0-3.1 | all libclam-qtmonitors-dev | 1.4.0-3.1 | mips64el libclam-qtmonitors-dev | 1.4.0-3.1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libclam-qtmonitors1.4 | 1.4.0-3.1 | mips64el libclam-qtmonitors1.4 | 1.4.0-3.1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; RC-buggy, unmaintained since 2011 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 833...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/833073 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#833073: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.4.0-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package clam-networkeditor has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/833073 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#826784: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: forked-daapd | 23.3-1+b1 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; new version requires support for (linux-only) inotify -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 826...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/826784 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#826237: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: supercollider-supernova | 1:3.6.6~repack-2-2 | armel, mips, s390x supercollider-supernova | 1:3.7.0~repack-1 | armhf, mipsel --- Reason --- ROM; ANAIS -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 826...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/826237 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784531: marked as done ([supercollider] Qt4's WebKit removal)
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 00:48:56 + with message-id <e1b3v68-0006ff...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#784531: fixed in supercollider 1:3.7.0~repack-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #784531, regarding [supercollider] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 784531: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784531 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: supercollider Version: 1:3.6.6~repack-2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Packages Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html> Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: supercollider Source-Version: 1:3.7.0~repack-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of supercollider, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 784...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> (supplier of updated supercollider package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 22:33:58 -0400 Source: supercollider Binary: supercollider supercollider-language supercollider-common supercollider-server supercollider-ide supercollider-supernova libscsynth1 supercollider-dev supercollider-emacs supercollider-vim supercollider-gedit Architecture: source Version: 1:3.7.0~repack-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Packages Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> Description: libscsynth1 - SuperCollider synthesis server library supercollider - real time audio synthesis programming language supercollider-common - common files for SuperCollider supercollider-dev - development files for SuperCollider supercollider-emacs - SuperCollider mode for Emacs supercollider-gedit - SuperCollider mode for Gedit supercollider-ide - integrated development environment for supercollider audio system supercollider-language - real time audio synthesis programming language supercollider-server - real time audio synthesis server supercollider-supernova - real time audio synthesis server (multiprocessor version) supercollider-vim - SuperCollider mode
Bug#823364: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: ffmpeg-dbg | 7:2.8.6-1+b1 | mips ffmpeg-dbg | 7:2.8.6-1+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- NBS; cruft -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 823...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/823364 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#821797: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: bijiben | 3.20.0-1 | hurd-i386 easytag-nautilus |2.4.2-1 | hurd-i386 gnome-applets | 3.18.2-1 | hurd-i386 gnome-applets-dbg | 3.18.2-1 | hurd-i386 gnome-documents |3.8.4-3 | hurd-i386 gnome-music | 3.18.2-1 | hurd-i386 gnome-online-miners | 3.20.0-2 | hurd-i386 gnome-photos | 3.20.1-1 | hurd-i386 gnome-sushi | 3.10.0-1+b2 | hurd-i386 grilo-plugins-0.2 | 0.2.17-1 | hurd-i386 grilo-plugins-0.3 | 0.3.0-1.1 | hurd-i386 nautilus | 3.18.5-1 | hurd-i386 nautilus-dbg | 3.18.5-1 | hurd-i386 nautilus-sendto |3.8.2-2 | hurd-i386 nautilus-share |0.7.3-2 | hurd-i386 rygel-tracker | 0.28.3-1 | hurd-i386 totem | 3.20.1-2 | hurd-i386 totem-plugins | 3.20.1-2 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; build dependency (tracker) not available on hurd-i386 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 821...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/821797 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#820394: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: blender | 2.74+dfsg0-3 | hurd-i386 blender-dbg | 2.74+dfsg0-3 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; new B-D libjemalloc-dev missing on hurd -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 820...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/820394 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#817838: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.2.3-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package morituri has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/817838 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#817199: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 3:1.1.7-9+rm Dear submitter, as the package transcode has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/817199 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#813151: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libwxsvg-dbg | 2:1.4~dfsg-3 | mips64el libwxsvg-dbg | 2:1.4~dfsg-3+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libwxsvg-dev | 2:1.4~dfsg-3 | mips64el libwxsvg-dev | 2:1.4~dfsg-3+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libwxsvg2v5 | 2:1.4~dfsg-3 | mips64el libwxsvg2v5 | 2:1.4~dfsg-3+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x wxsvg | 2:1.4~dfsg-3 | source --- Reason --- RoM; unmaintained, library without rev deps -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 813...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/813151 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#813151: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 2:1.4~dfsg-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package wxsvg has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/813151 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#816259: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: sonic-pi | 2.9.0~repack-3 | ppc64el --- Reason --- ROM; broken binary package built by mistake -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 816...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/816259 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815439: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: jacktrip | 1.0.5.patch2-2 | hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; unsatisfiable B-D librtaudio-dev which only exists on linux-any -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 815...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/815439 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815430: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gpac | 0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-2 | hurd-i386 gpac-dbg | 0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-2 | hurd-i386 gpac-modules-base | 0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-2 | hurd-i386 libgpac-dbg | 0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-2 | hurd-i386 libgpac-dev | 0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-2 | hurd-i386 libgpac2 | 0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-2 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; FTBFS, unsatisfiable B-D: libfreenect-dev -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 815...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/815430 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815301: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: browser-plugin-vlc |2.0.6-4 | hurd-i386 cytadela |1.1.0-2 | hurd-i386 cytadela-dbg |1.1.0-2 | hurd-i386 freetuxtv | 0.6.6~dfsg1-1 | hurd-i386 gemrb |0.8.3-1 | hurd-i386 gemrb-baldurs-gate |0.8.3-1 | hurd-i386 gemrb-baldurs-gate-2 |0.8.3-1 | hurd-i386 gemrb-icewind-dale |0.8.3-1 | hurd-i386 gemrb-icewind-dale-2 |0.8.3-1 | hurd-i386 gemrb-planescape-torment |0.8.3-1 | hurd-i386 libgemrb |0.8.3-1 | hurd-i386 libvlc-dev |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 libvlc5 |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 libvlccore-dev |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 libvlccore7 |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 phonon-backend-vlc |0.8.2-1 | hurd-i386 phonon-backend-vlc-dbg |0.8.2-1 | hurd-i386 phonon4qt5-backend-vlc |0.8.2-1 | hurd-i386 phonon4qt5-backend-vlc-dbg |0.8.2-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-dbg |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-nox |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-plugin-fluidsynth |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-plugin-jack |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-plugin-notify |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-plugin-sdl |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-plugin-svg |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 vlc-plugin-zvbi |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- No longer buildable on hurd -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 815...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/815301 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815301: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: vlc |2.1.5-1 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; FTBFS, wontfix -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 815...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/815301 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814504: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.2.3-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package azr3-jack has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/814504 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814504: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: azr3-jack |1.2.3-2 | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips64el azr3-jack | 1.2.3-2+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; RC buggy; unmaintained upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 814...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/814504 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814498: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.2.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dino has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/814498 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814498: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dino |0.2.8-3 | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips64el dino | 0.2.8-3+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x dino | 0.2.8-3+b3 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- ROM; RC buggy; unmaintained upstream; alternatives available -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 814...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/814498 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784456: marked as done ([cantata] Qt4's WebKit removal)
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:49:59 + with message-id <e1ascpr-0004fp...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#784456: fixed in cantata 2.0.0+ds1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #784456, regarding [cantata] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 784456: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784456 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: cantata Version: 1.5.2.ds2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html> Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: cantata Source-Version: 2.0.0+ds1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cantata, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 784...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stuart Prescott <stu...@debian.org> (supplier of updated cantata package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 01:32:45 +1100 Source: cantata Binary: cantata Architecture: source Version: 2.0.0+ds1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Stuart Prescott <stu...@debian.org> Closes: 747724 784456 804936 808937 Description: cantata- KDE client for the music player daemon (MPD) Changes: cantata (2.0.0+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release - change wikipedia links (Closes: #747724). * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.7 (no changes required). * Switch build to Qt5 (Closes: #804936). * Remove unneeded build-dependency on libqtwebkit-dev (Closes: #784456). * Add liburi-perl to Recommends (Closes: #808937). * Drop menu file as per #741573. Checksums-Sha1: 83e607540827d566c34ce50a9b5f9a53b29075aa 2356 cantata_2.0.0+ds1-1.dsc 9b653eb99bf50d782ad42d36621ceef05ace4cc9 2389895 cantata_2.0.0+ds1.orig.tar.gz 7bac92337753aa2ff78c1a5082bba3b7852fe33f 12708 cantata_2.0.0+ds1-1.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 8f398fe3aada27749b3b0346e92a0de0fb1f7d8fef030a3c9300f3aa8aef46ef 2356 cantata_2.0.0+ds1-1.dsc 0e621d52636dd693b28b4f8157c62d5321821d26b358fce1c501d505f48c58de 23
Bug#806666: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: advene | 1.1-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; low popcon; depends on legacy libs scheduled for removals (gstreamer 0.10) -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 806...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/80 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#810251: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.3.7~ds0-2.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package guayadeque has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/810251 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#810251: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: guayadeque | 0.3.7~ds0-2.1 | source, mips64el guayadeque | 0.3.7~ds0-2.1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x guayadeque-dbg | 0.3.7~ds0-2.1 | mips64el guayadeque-dbg | 0.3.7~ds0-2.1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream; depends on gstreamer 0.10 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 810...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/810251 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#806666: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.1-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package advene has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/80 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784496: marked as done ([mixxx] Qt4's WebKit removal)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:20:24 + with message-id <e1anrmu-0001dy...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#784496: fixed in mixxx 2.0.0~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #784496, regarding [mixxx] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 784496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784496 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: mixxx Version: 1.11.0~dfsg-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html> Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: mixxx Source-Version: 2.0.0~dfsg-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mixxx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 784...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> (supplier of updated mixxx package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:59:59 +0100 Source: mixxx Binary: mixxx mixxx-data Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.0~dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> Description: mixxx - Digital Disc Jockey Interface mixxx-data - Digital Disc Jockey Interface -- data files Closes: 766959 784496 Changes: mixxx (2.0.0~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. . [ Mateusz Łukasik ] * New upstream release: - Refresh patches. - Remove 0001-update_configure.patch - no longer needed. - Remove 9001-waveformsignalcolors_fix.patch - included upstream. * Update debian/repack.sh script to latest version. * Remove obsolete menu file. * Update debian/repack.local for new upstream version. * debian/control: - Add to B-D: libsqlite3-dev, librubberband-dev,libchromaprint-dev. - Use QT5. (Closes: #766959, #784496) * debian/rules: - Switch to QT5. . [ Sebastian Ramacher ] * debian/rules: - Build with --as-needed. - Disable use of __DATE__ and __TIME__. - Remove RPATH. * debian/control: - Bump libsoundtouch-dev B-D. - Add li
Bug#810758: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: ardour | 1:2.8.16+git20131003-4 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 ardour-dbg | 1:2.8.16+git20131003-4 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 --- Reason --- ROM; commercial restriction -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 810...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/810758 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#798828: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: videolan-doc | 20070626-1 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; severely outdated -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 798...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/798828 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#798828: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 20070626-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package videolan-doc has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/798828 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#803470: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: kodi | 15.2~rc1+dfsg1-1 | all kodi-addons-dev | 15.1+dfsg1-3 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; obsolete arch:all package -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 803...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/803470 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#802710: musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace
Hi On 2015-10-22 16:09:22, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Source: musescore > Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > > Hi! While doing qt5's qtbase's private headers transition we noted that > musescore > got into the list of packages that needed a transition [lop] but without > build depending on qtbase5-dev. > > [lop] <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-5-1.html> > > My teammate Dmitry Schanev found out that musescore ships a Qt5 private > header: > > <http://sources.debian.net/src/musescore/2.0.2%2Bdfsg-1/thirdparty/xmlstream/xmlutils_p.h/> > > By building this header without a namespace the symbols that it generates > matchs the symbols > of qtbase's private stuff, so unnecesarily being part of transitions like > this. The xmlstream stuff is not the problem. They are not unresolved symbols and do not cause a dependency on qtbase-abi-5-5-1. They probably clash with the symbols from Qt, but that's easy to fix with a namespace or renaming the copy of QXmlUtils. Looking at the output of dpkg-shlibdeps with -v -v shows the actual problem: | Looking up symbol _ZN12QPaintEngineC2ER19QPaintEnginePrivate6QFlagsINS_18PaintEngineFeatureEE@Base | Found in symbols file of libQt5Gui.so.5 (minver: 5.0.2, dep: libqt5gui5 #MINVER#, qtbase-abi-5-5-1) This might be caused by mscore/paintengine_p.h and mscore/svgenerator.* where the QPaintEngine and QPaintEnginePrivate are used. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#802710: musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace
On Friday 23 October 2015 15:53:37 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi [snip] > > By building this header without a namespace the symbols that it generates > > matchs the symbols of qtbase's private stuff, so unnecesarily being part > > of transitions like this. > The xmlstream stuff is not the problem. They are not unresolved symbols and > do not cause a dependency on qtbase-abi-5-5-1. They probably clash with the > symbols from Qt, but that's easy to fix with a namespace or renaming the > copy of QXmlUtils. > > Looking at the output of dpkg-shlibdeps with -v -v shows the actual problem: > | Looking up symbol > | _ZN12QPaintEngineC2ER19QPaintEnginePrivate6QFlagsINS_18PaintEngineFeatur > | eEE@Base Found in symbols file of libQt5Gui.so.5 (minver: 5.0.2, dep: > | libqt5gui5 #MINVER#, qtbase-abi-5-5-1) > This might be caused by mscore/paintengine_p.h and mscore/svgenerator.* > where the QPaintEngine and QPaintEnginePrivate are used. Thanks a lot for the head up Sebastian :) Indeed that seems to be the cause, and using a namespace or renaming the classes should fix it. Or avoiding using Qt's internal at all, of course. -- http://xkcd.com/150/ Personas como ésta no se encuentran todos los días. Y cuando uno las encuentra, suelen no estar disponibles. Si encontrás una, no la pierdas. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#802710: musescore: Embeds Qt5's private headers without putting them in a namespace
Source: musescore Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1 Severity: important Hi! While doing qt5's qtbase's private headers transition we noted that musescore got into the list of packages that needed a transition [lop] but without build depending on qtbase5-dev. [lop] <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-5-1.html> My teammate Dmitry Schanev found out that musescore ships a Qt5 private header: <http://sources.debian.net/src/musescore/2.0.2%2Bdfsg-1/thirdparty/xmlstream/xmlutils_p.h/> By building this header without a namespace the symbols that it generates matchs the symbols of qtbase's private stuff, so unnecesarily being part of transitions like this. This is easily solvable by putting the headers under a namespace (like musescore3rdparty, for example) and using them trough it. Another better solution is to avoid embedding private stuff at all, of course :) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#664871: marked as done (mplayer2's output has lots of debug messages from libav)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Oct 2015 23:46:06 +
with message-id <e1zogbw-yh...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#794817: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #664871,
regarding mplayer2's output has lots of debug messages from libav
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
664871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mplayer2
Version: 2.0-426-gc32b3ed-2
Severity: normal
Hi.
Whenever I listen to the radio station at
http://media.sgr.globo.com/CBN/cbnsp.stream/playlist.m3u8
I get bazillions of messages like the following in my output:
,
| Using network protocols without global network initialization. Please use
avformat_network_init(), this will become mandatory later.
| Using network protocols without global network initialization. Please use
avformat_network_init(), this will become mandatory later.
| Using network protocols without global network initialization. Please use
avformat_network_init(), this will become mandatory later.
| Using network protocols without global network initialization. Please use
avformat_network_init(), this will become mandatory later.
`
Perhaps a small patch is due here.
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-rc6-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages mplayer2 depends on:
ii libaa11.4p5-39
ii libasound21.0.25-2
ii libass4 0.10.0-3
ii libaudio2 1.9.3-4
ii libavcodec53 4:0.8.1-1
ii libavformat53 4:0.8.1-1
ii libavutil51 4:0.8.1-1
ii libbluray11:0.2.2-1
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libcaca0 0.99.beta17-2.1
ii libcdparanoia03.10.2+debian-10.1
ii libdca0 0.0.5-5
ii libdirectfb-1.2-9 1.2.10.0-4.3
ii libdvdnav44.2.0-1
ii libdvdread4 4.2.0-1
ii libenca0 1.13-4
ii libesd0 0.2.41-10+b1
ii libfaad2 2.7-8
ii libfontconfig12.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype6 2.4.8-1
ii libfribidi0 0.19.2-2
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.3-1
ii libgif4 4.1.6-9
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.11.2-1
ii libjack0 [libjack-0.116] 1:0.121.3+20120222git81e8f031-1
ii libjpeg8 8d-1
ii liblircclient00.9.0~pre1-1
ii libncurses5 5.9-4
ii libogg0 1.2.2~dfsg-1
ii libpng12-01.2.47-1
ii libpostproc52 4:0.8.1-1
ii libpulse0 1.1-3
ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.15-2
ii libsmbclient 2:3.6.3-2
ii libspeex1 1.2~rc1-3
ii libstdc++64.6.3-1
ii libswscale2 4:0.8.1-1
ii libtheora01.1.1+dfsg.1-3
ii libtinfo5 5.9-4
ii libvdpau1 0.4.1-5
ii libvorbis0a 1.3.2-1.1
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4
ii libxext6 2:1.3.0-3
ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.1-3
ii libxt61:1.1.1-2
ii libxv12:1.0.6-2
ii libxvidcore4 3:1.3.2-0.4
ii libxxf86dga1 2:1.1.2-1
ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.1-2
ii zlib1g1:1.2.6.dfsg-2
mplayer2 recommends no packages.
mplayer2 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC
http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog : Projects : https://github.com/rbrito/
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package mplayer2 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/794817
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the a
Bug#794817: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mplayer2 | 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4 | source, mips64el mplayer2 | 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4+b1 | arm64 mplayer2 | 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4+b2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x mplayer2-dbg | 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4 | mips64el mplayer2-dbg | 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4+b1 | arm64 mplayer2-dbg | 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4+b2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; dead upstream, replacement exists -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 794...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/794817 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#794817: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 2.0-728-g2c378c7-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package mplayer2 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/794817 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#799945: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1:3.5.403~dfsg-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package ardour3 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/799945 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#799945: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: ardour3 | 1:3.5.403~dfsg-4 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; package obsolete (replaced by newer version in different source package) -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 799...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/799945 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libav | 6:11.4-2 | source libav-dbg | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libav-doc | 6:11.4-2 | all libavcodec-extra | 6:11.4-2 | all libavcodec-extra-56 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavcodec56 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavdevice55 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavfilter5 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavformat56 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavresample2 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavutil54 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libswscale3 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; outdated, replaced by ffmpeg -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 796...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/796272 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#797193: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.0.9-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package gnome-mplayer has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/797193 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#797193: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gnome-mplayer |1.0.9-3 | source gnome-mplayer | 1.0.9-3+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x gnome-mplayer-dbg | 1.0.9-3+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; buggy, no active maintainer upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 797...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/797193 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#797195: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gmtk |1.0.9-2 | source libgmlib-dev |1.0.9-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libgmlib1 |1.0.9-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libgmlib1-dbg |1.0.9-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libgmtk-dev |1.0.9-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libgmtk1 |1.0.9-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libgmtk1-data |1.0.9-2 | all libgmtk1-dbg |1.0.9-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; Not maintained upstream, better alternatives available (e.g. VLC) -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 797...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/797195 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#797188: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gecko-mediaplayer |1.0.9-1 | source, hurd-i386 gecko-mediaplayer |1.0.9-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; buggy, needs new maintainer upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 797...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/797188 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#796269: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libpostproc | 6:0.git20120821-4 | source libpostproc52 | 6:0.git20120821-4 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; outdated, replaced by ffmpeg -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 796...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/796269 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#796269: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 6:0.git20120821-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package libpostproc has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796269 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784499: marked as done ([musescore] Qt4's WebKit removal)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:35:29 -0400 with message-id 20150708133529.ga25...@acaia.ca and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #784499, regarding [musescore] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 784499: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784499 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: musescore Version: 1.3+dfsg1-0.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Toby Smithe tsmi...@ubuntu.com, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Ana, the current musescore package which is in Sid no longer depends on any Qt4 library, so I'm closing this bug. Thanks, -- tiago---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 06/12/2015 03:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: Non-soundsynth packages like gem should of course not be in the soundsynth package, maybe we need a videosynth package? i would have put it into the video task, but now i see that this is full with video *players* (and the occasional vjing and converter tool). so actually i would split video in multiple packages (videoplayers, videosynth, vjing,...) and have the original video package Depends/Recommends these. Good idea. - ffmulticonverter Quite possibly you need to transcode your resulting audio for distribution? but that's not a recording task, it's postproduction (which comes after the *mixing* task). Indeed. Feel free to correct things. As I said when I almost dropped the tasks and Ross has said now again, the current categorizations are not really ok. I unfortunately am out of time to invest much effort into this. Generating new tasks is not something I have played with yet, and will probably involve some work to rebuild the web sentinel pages. I need to do some reading. I will try and put some suggested restructuring up on the wiki based on this thread and previous ones. It would be best to be sure before we make the step. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 13 June 2015 at 03:49, Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote: On 06/12/2015 03:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: Non-soundsynth packages like gem should of course not be in the soundsynth package, maybe we need a videosynth package? i would have put it into the video task, but now i see that this is full with video *players* (and the occasional vjing and converter tool). so actually i would split video in multiple packages (videoplayers, videosynth, vjing,...) and have the original video package Depends/Recommends these. Good idea. - ffmulticonverter Quite possibly you need to transcode your resulting audio for distribution? but that's not a recording task, it's postproduction (which comes after the *mixing* task). Indeed. Feel free to correct things. As I said when I almost dropped the tasks and Ross has said now again, the current categorizations are not really ok. I unfortunately am out of time to invest much effort into this. Generating new tasks is not something I have played with yet, and will probably involve some work to rebuild the web sentinel pages. I need to do some reading. I think those are generated automatically. At least I never did anything to have them generated. Andreas should know for sure. I will try and put some suggested restructuring up on the wiki based on this thread and previous ones. It would be best to be sure before we make the step. Cool! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 11 June 2015 at 21:53, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at wrote: On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: synthesis at all; darn - did i just here me volunteer to maintain a puredata task?) :) I don't think we need per-application-ecosystem metapackages. but right now the user does not have a possibility to install an entire ecosystem like Pd's. which i think is a flaw. if my use-case of meta-packages is a single pkg installation to get me running for a given task, then i find a package that pulls in an entire ecosystems of more relevance than a a broad selection of packages that could be useful in that task. but maybe Pd is a bit of an outlier here, with 70+ (binary) packages that all belong to the same ecosystem. Yes, I don't think we have another ecosystem with so many packages. and of course i'm biased here. i do believe that Debian should have a meta-package for the entire pd-universe; and so i thought that the multimedia-blends would fit the bill. In light of the above, it indeed might. Non-soundsynth packages like gem should of course not be in the soundsynth package, maybe we need a videosynth package? i would have put it into the video task, but now i see that this is full with video *players* (and the occasional vjing and converter tool). so actually i would split video in multiple packages (videoplayers, videosynth, vjing,...) and have the original video package Depends/Recommends these. Good idea. - ffmulticonverter Quite possibly you need to transcode your resulting audio for distribution? but that's not a recording task, it's postproduction (which comes after the *mixing* task). Indeed. Feel free to correct things. As I said when I almost dropped the tasks and Ross has said now again, the current categorizations are not really ok. I unfortunately am out of time to invest much effort into this. anyhow: can't a package be in multiple tasks? Yes, it can. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
hi, esp ross, i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain. should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require some discussion? furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends* relationship. now i'm not an expert with blends, but personally i think that 'Depends' should be avoided as much as possible (in general). this is even more important, as i think that most tasks in the multimedia blend are rather aggregative (or whatever the word): chances are high that a person that selects a given task will never ever need *most* of the packages in the task. in general i think there are too many packages in the various tasks (e.g. it might make sense to factor out the entire pd-clan from soundsynthesis, as most of those packages don't deal with sound synthesis at all; darn - did i just here me volunteer to maintain a puredata task?) anyhow: if i want to some record some audio, i would select the recording task, which will installs by (among other things): at least (at a first glance) 4 multitrack recorders (3 of them via Depends) - ardour - ardour3 - qtractor - ecasound (though for whatever reasons audicity is missing) and a few tools which i fail to see why they are in recording at all (only listing a few select Depends-packages): - jackd - qjackctl - ffmulticonverter if the blend is to give an overview of what is available (so the user can try a few, and then pick their favourite tool), wouldn't it make more sense to Recommend most packages, so that they can easily get rid of the tools they dislike (without having to uninstall the entire task, which potentially removes all the (other) automatically-installed dependencies) if most of the above can be explained away by my total ignorance of blends, please excuse (and enlighten) me. gfmsard IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 11 June 2015 at 15:41, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: hi, esp ross, i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain. should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require some discussion? I would say yes. After all, if we end up disagreeing, git revert-ing is easy. furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends* relationship. now i'm not an expert with blends, but personally i think that 'Depends' should be avoided as much as possible (in general). The blends machinery automatically demotes all Depends to Recommends. See the generated packages[1]. I'm not sure if Recommends are demoted to Suggests. [1] eg https://packages.debian.org/sid/multimedia-soundsynthesis in general i think there are too many packages in the various tasks (e.g. it might make sense to factor out the entire pd-clan from soundsynthesis, as most of those packages don't deal with sound synthesis at all; darn - did i just here me volunteer to maintain a puredata task?) :) I don't think we need per-application-ecosystem metapackages. Non-soundsynth packages like gem should of course not be in the soundsynth package, maybe we need a videosynth package? anyhow: if i want to some record some audio, i would select the recording task, which will installs by (among other things): at least (at a first glance) 4 multitrack recorders (3 of them via Depends) - ardour - ardour3 Wasn't ardour3 to be renamed ardour for v4? Then we would have just one. - qtractor - ecasound (though for whatever reasons audicity is missing) and a few tools which i fail to see why they are in recording at all (only listing a few select Depends-packages): - jackd This is a bit odd (it should probably be indirectly pulled in by the app that wants it). - qjackctl But this is not. If we know ardour needs jack (this is no longer the case apparently?), installing qjackctl makes a lot of sense. - ffmulticonverter Quite possibly you need to transcode your resulting audio for distribution? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
Hi IOhannes, On 06/11/2015 08:41 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: hi, esp ross, i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain. I was actually planning to send an update when I am finished sifting through the RFP's. But now is as good a time as any. should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require some discussion? Yes please! There are bound to be things wrongly categorised. And sometimes a package does so much stuff you have to choose between having it in lots of tasks, or just the one it majors in (very subjective). I will keep an eye on the log for any syntax errors etc. furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends* relationship. now i'm not an expert with blends, but personally i think that 'Depends' should be avoided as much as possible (in general). I think the web sentinel (task pages) do not distinguish between Depends and Recommends. But if you put Suggests it lists the package in the packages with lower relevance section toward the bottom. When building the metapackages, all Depends are demoted to Recommends. this is even more important, as i think that most tasks in the multimedia blend are rather aggregative (or whatever the word): chances are high that a person that selects a given task will never ever need *most* of the packages in the task. The web sentinel is to help people find relevant packages so they can choose which one to install. In this case, it is better to have all relevant packages listed somewhere. in general i think there are too many packages in the various tasks (e.g. it might make sense to factor out the entire pd-clan from soundsynthesis, as most of those packages don't deal with sound synthesis at all; darn - did i just here me volunteer to maintain a puredata task?) That is a good suggestion, and there is already a precedence with the ladi task. Whilst sifting through all the packages, I found I was missing tasks for things like broadcast, cinema, streaming, photography animation. We also have a lot of audio file post-processing tools (e.g volume pitch shifters) that I found it hard to categorise. I think I put them in timestretching. Maybe this task should be renamed (or the description of the task redefined)? anyhow: if i want to some record some audio, i would select the recording task, which will installs by (among other things): at least (at a first glance) 4 multitrack recorders (3 of them via Depends) - ardour - ardour3 - qtractor - ecasound (though for whatever reasons audicity is missing) Audacity for some strange reason is in the mixing task. and a few tools which i fail to see why they are in recording at all (only listing a few select Depends-packages): - jackd - qjackctl - ffmulticonverter if the blend is to give an overview of what is available (so the user can try a few, and then pick their favourite tool), wouldn't it make more sense to Recommend most packages, so that they can easily get rid of the tools they dislike (without having to uninstall the entire task, which potentially removes all the (other) automatically-installed dependencies) Yes, in my opinion the more packages there are in the task (good for the web sentinel), the less useful the meta-package becomes. I think it was Jonas who suggested we should create some tasks for different music studio setups. I was thinking of having a basic audio workstation (some simple tools), and a more pro workstation. These tasks could have a small number of essential tools tailored to the user's level of experience. There is also the possibility on providing tailored config settings (e.g. PulseAudio/jack, low latency kernels etc.) in the metapackages, but I would need some help here! I should try and find the archive of that thread. if most of the above can be explained away by my total ignorance of blends, please excuse (and enlighten) me. You are not alone! I have only picked up a bit of knowledge because my first sponsor was Andreas Tille, and it was one of his stipulated conditions for sponsorship :-) https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB Maybe we should try and sketch out some ideas for the blends tasks on the wiki? Thanks for the good question. Cheers, Ross signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 06/11/2015 09:44 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends* relationship. now i'm not an expert with blends, but personally i think that 'Depends' should be avoided as much as possible (in general). I think the web sentinel (task pages) do not distinguish between Depends and Recommends. But if you put Suggests it lists the package in the packages with lower relevance section toward the bottom. When building the metapackages, all Depends are demoted to Recommends. ah, that's good to know. before writing, i briefly had a look at various task-packages (e.g. task-ssh-server), and they do have hard dependencies. i know see that these are different beasts than blends tasks. (though for whatever reasons audicity is missing) Audacity for some strange reason is in the mixing task. and quite a lot of mixing packages are in the recording package (e.g. non-mixer). anyhow: can't a package be in multiple tasks? gfmdst IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: synthesis at all; darn - did i just here me volunteer to maintain a puredata task?) :) I don't think we need per-application-ecosystem metapackages. but right now the user does not have a possibility to install an entire ecosystem like Pd's. which i think is a flaw. if my use-case of meta-packages is a single pkg installation to get me running for a given task, then i find a package that pulls in an entire ecosystems of more relevance than a a broad selection of packages that could be useful in that task. but maybe Pd is a bit of an outlier here, with 70+ (binary) packages that all belong to the same ecosystem. and of course i'm biased here. i do believe that Debian should have a meta-package for the entire pd-universe; and so i thought that the multimedia-blends would fit the bill. Non-soundsynth packages like gem should of course not be in the soundsynth package, maybe we need a videosynth package? i would have put it into the video task, but now i see that this is full with video *players* (and the occasional vjing and converter tool). so actually i would split video in multiple packages (videoplayers, videosynth, vjing,...) and have the original video package Depends/Recommends these. gmsadr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: The blends machinery automatically demotes all Depends to Recommends. See the generated packages[1]. I'm not sure if Recommends are demoted to Suggests. looks like it does for non-existing packages (e.g. boodler in soundsynthesis). gfmrdsa IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)
On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 11 June 2015 at 15:41, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: anyhow: if i want to some record some audio, i would select the recording task, which will installs by (among other things): at least (at a first glance) 4 multitrack recorders (3 of them via Depends) - ardour - ardour3 Wasn't ardour3 to be renamed ardour for v4? Then we would have just one. since i know that Depends are only Recommends, all is good: we should have *all* recording packages in recording. - qtractor - ecasound (though for whatever reasons audicity is missing) and a few tools which i fail to see why they are in recording at all (only listing a few select Depends-packages): - jackd This is a bit odd (it should probably be indirectly pulled in by the app that wants it). yes. - qjackctl But this is not. If we know ardour needs jack (this is no longer the case apparently?), installing qjackctl makes a lot of sense. dunno. esp. in the case of ardour, it can handle jack connections quite well all alone (no need to manually fuddle around with qjackctl). but anyhow, my point is: if qjackctl is a good companion for ardour, shouldn't it be in the Recommends section of ardour? - ffmulticonverter Quite possibly you need to transcode your resulting audio for distribution? but that's not a recording task, it's postproduction (which comes after the *mixing* task). fmsdar IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#785935: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: flumotion | 0.10.0-3 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc --- Reason --- ROM; unmaintained upstream; depends on obsolete gstreamer0.10 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 785...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/785935 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#785935: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.10.0-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package flumotion has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/785935 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#608727: marked as done (vlc: audio pops periodically with S/PDIF passthrough)
Your message dated Sun, 10 May 2015 18:57:31 +0200 with message-id 20150510165731.ga12...@ramacher.at and subject line Re: Bug#608727: (no subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #608727, regarding vlc: audio pops periodically with S/PDIF passthrough to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 608727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608727 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: vlc Version: 1.1.3-1 Severity: normal Sometimes when playing DVDs in VLC, the audio will pop periodically at a regular interval. This doesn't happen with every DVD, nor does it always happen every time with the same DVD. I could sometimes fix it by relaunching VLC or ejecting and re-inserting the DVD, sometimes it doesn't make a difference. A few notable features of my configuration are I am using spdif passthrough with ALSA for the audio and I am forcing vsync with the radeon drivers. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages vlc depends on: ii libaa1 1.4p5-38 ascii art library ii libc6 2.11.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libfreetype62.4.2-2.1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libfribidi0 0.19.2-1 Free Implementation of the Unicode ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8GCC support library ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1 7.7.1-4 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libqtcore4 4:4.6.3-4Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.6.3-4Qt 4 GUI module ii libsdl-image1.2 1.2.10-2+b2 image loading library for Simple D ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.14-6.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 pn libtar none (no description available) pn libvlccore4 none (no description available) ii libx11-62:1.3.3-4X11 client-side library ii libx11-xcb1 2:1.3.3-4Xlib/XCB interface library pn libxcb-keysyms1 none (no description available) pn libxcb-randr0 none (no description available) ii libxcb-shm0 1.6-1X C Binding, shm extension ii libxcb-xv0 1.6-1X C Binding, xv extension ii libxcb1 1.6-1X C Binding ii libxext62:1.1.2-1X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii ttf-freefont20090104-7 Freefont Serif, Sans and Mono True pn vlc-nox none (no description available) ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime Versions of packages vlc recommends: pn vlc-plugin-notify none (no description available) pn vlc-plugin-pulse none (no description available) Versions of packages vlc suggests: pn mozilla-plugin-vlcnone (no description available) pn videolan-doc none (no description available) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2011-10-11 23:35:38, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: retitle 608727 vlc: audio pops periodically with S/PDIF passthrough tags 608727 = upstream wontfix thanks When using S/PDIF passthrough, there is no way to resample. Since VLC syncs on the CPU clock rather than the audio card buffer, slight drift may cause clicks. There is currently no solution, other than not to use passthrough. Closing as wontfix. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784457: [clam-networkeditor] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: clam-networkeditor Version: 1.4.0-3.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784496: [mixxx] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: mixxx Version: 1.11.0~dfsg-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784456: [cantata] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: cantata Version: 1.5.2.ds2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#784531: [supercollider] Qt4's WebKit removal
Source: supercollider Version: 1:3.6.6~repack-2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Packages Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg1.html Basically we are about to get the latest Qt4 point release and upstream is migrating from WebKit to Bing in the Qt5 series, so we won't have much upstream support for maintaining Qt4's WebKit. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the Qt4's WebKit library have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the Qt4 version = Porting = Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4. In order to ease the transition time we have provided Wheezy backports for Qt5. Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever you start porting your application. [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtstuff.html [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Ana, on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#780536: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: forked-daapd | 22.0-1 | mips --- Reason --- ROM; ICE; FTBFS -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 780...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/780536 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#766218: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libmkv | 0.6.5.1-1.1 | source libmkv-dev | 0.6.5.1-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc libmkv0 | 0.6.5.1-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc --- Reason --- ROM; obsolete, unused, dead upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 766...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/766218 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#766209: Removed package(s) from experimental
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from experimental: beast |0.7.6-1 | source, hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 beast |0.7.8-1 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc beast-doc |0.7.6-1 | all beast-doc |0.7.8-1 | all bse-alsa |0.7.6-1 | hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 bse-alsa |0.7.8-1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc libbse-0.7-4 |0.7.6-1 | hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 libbse-0.7-4 |0.7.8-1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc libbse-dev |0.7.6-1 | all libbse-dev |0.7.8-1 | all --- Reason --- ROM; also remove from experimental after unstable removal -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 766...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/766209 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#765515: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.7.4-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package beast has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765515 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#765515: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: beast |0.7.4-5 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc beast-doc |0.7.4-5 | all bse-alsa |0.7.4-5 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc libbse-0.7-4 |0.7.4-5 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc libbse-dev |0.7.4-5 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, blocks guile1.8 removal -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 765...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/765515 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#765515: Removed package(s) from unstable
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: Version: 0.7.4-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package beast has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765515 This isn't documented in the bitsfrom page... is this intended? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#765515: Removed package(s) from unstable
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: Version: 0.7.4-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package beast has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765515 This isn't documented in the bitsfrom page... is this intended? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#765515: Removed package(s) from unstable
Hi, and sorry for the empty mail. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: This isn't documented in the bitsfrom page... is this intended? Yes, it is. It should be mentioned in our Bits too. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
