Hi,
I've been going ahead in splitting the package different way, I was
intended to give users the chance to install both versions.
Anyway, since we are a team and I'm the only one who believes that
would be useful :) there is no problem to me to revert the changes
done and make things back.
Hi Alessio!
I'm seeing you continue to split the mhwaveedit package. As already
asked a few days ago: Why do you lower the flexibility of having one
package that works with every supported audio backend?
The way you do it right now is limiting, you either have pulse or JACK.
To me, having both
Am 30.06.2010 11:46, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
The way you do it right now is limiting, you either have pulse or JACK.
To me, having both in one package seems more reasonable than avoiding a
dependency on either pulse or jack with specialised packages.
Especially since the mhwaveedit package
