Re: Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Hanno Zulla] > sorry, I will fix those lintian warnings tomorrow. As discussed on IRC, I decided to fix the issue in the changelog and uploaded. I hope you can figure out how to fix the tag. -- Happy hacking PEtter Reinholdtsen ___ pkg-multimedia-ma

Re: Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-25 Thread Hanno Zulla
Hi, sorry, I will fix those lintian warnings tomorrow. > I also think that the actual uploader should push (and ideally sign) > the tag. Or at least push the tags after uploading. > > If I remember correctly, our pet instance marks packages that have a proper > distribution set without a tag as

Re: Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2016-02-25 20:23:01, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Hanno Zulla] > > Could you please have a look at it and if you agree, upload it? > > When I build it, I get these lintian warnings: > > W: supercollider-sc3-plugins source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.6 > (current is 3.9.7) > W: sc3

Re: Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Hanno Zulla] > Could you please have a look at it and if you agree, upload it? When I build it, I get these lintian warnings: W: supercollider-sc3-plugins source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.6 (current is 3.9.7) W: sc3-plugins-server-dbgsym: package-has-long-file-name 75 (84) > 80 W: sc3-

Re: Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-25 Thread Hanno Zulla
Hello Felipe, thanks for your pointer in the right direction at https://github.com/supercollider/sc3-plugins/pull/73 except for the stackrealign flag question (which I believe to be an artefact in the original cmake rule), I believe 3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-7 fixes the sc3-plugins b

Re: Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-24 Thread Hanno Zulla
Hi, > I see the problem is in the stk subdir. Maybe the endianness test can > be skipped if using a system stk? Thanks, but the STK Ugen plugin is already using the system STK. Upstream had been so nice to add a SYSTEM_STK=on configuration switch just for Debian to allow this: https://github.com

Re: Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi, On 22 February 2016 at 06:59, Hanno Zulla wrote: > Hi Petter, > Hi multimedia-maintainers, > > first of all, thanks for getting the packages up to speed and ready for > Debian. It took a while, but I learned a lot. :-) > > Thanks Petter, I have noticed the issues you mentioned already. > > >

Status of sonic-pi and supercollider-sc3-plugins (Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi, see #796550)

2016-02-22 Thread Hanno Zulla
Hi Petter, Hi multimedia-maintainers, first of all, thanks for getting the packages up to speed and ready for Debian. It took a while, but I learned a lot. :-) Thanks Petter, I have noticed the issues you mentioned already. supercollider-sc3-plugins fails to build due to a problem with the cmak